SCI-ART LAB

Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication

Q: Why don't people accept their faults? Even if they made any mistakes, why can't they just accept it?
Q: Ma'am why don't people accept their mistakes even if they are very obvious?
Q: How should we deal with people who don't accept their mistakes?
Krishna: Incorrigible is the word: incapable of being corrected or amended.

In context, the word usually implies that the person doesn't respond well to criticism or admit fault.

Psychological rigidity is not a sign of strength.

But still, no one enjoys being wrong or told that they are at fault. It’s an unpleasant emotional experience for  them.
The first step for solving a problem is to accept that there is one.
However, some people are never to blame for anything - at least according to them. Their attitude is rather like that of young children who, when they’re caught doing something they shouldn’t, point the finger at someone else.
According to psychologists, those adults who can't assume responsibility for their mistakes have an immature personality. Their go-to strategy for coping with life is “probably based on fear of having to assume the consequences of their own actions".
While some people know deep down they are at fault, many who act in this way genuinely believe that it is everyone else who is the problem. Such people “tend to see themselves as neutral spectators of life, or as victims of everything and everyone, without any personal influence on events.
Other people don't own their mistakes because they are under some delusion that they can't make mistakes because they are very good.
 
Most others want to escape the consequences of accepting their faults.  
Some people refuse to admit they’re wrong, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, due to a fragile ego. 
Some, on the other hand, don't accept accusations because others can't fully understand their view and therefore misunderstand them. This is a minority community and even if you think these people make mistakes, it is your understanding that is at fault, not them!
Good people themselves realize and understand when they make mistakes. They accept them with humility, analyse thoroughly the situations that led to these errors and try to correct themselves.  They know what is right and what is wrong. Even if they miss some points, if you just point them out to them, they immediately accept them and get corrected.
People who are under illusions and delusions  cannot analyse the inputs and  situations properly, come under the influence of biases,  and try to put the blame on others. They also  vehemently deny that they made any mistake.
If one cannot psychologically handle being wrong, they may deny facts to defend their actions or beliefs.
 
Nonchalant
: having an air of easy unconcern or indifference about teh societal norms.
Arrogant
: showing an offensive attitude of superiority and thinking that a superior person can never be at fault!
Unrepentant (not exhibiting shame or remorse) human beings never accept  their mistakes even if they are grave ones like committing murders.
What about when a person does push back against the facts, when they simply cannot admit they were wrong in any circumstance? What is it in their psychological makeup that makes it impossible for them to admit they were wrong, even when it is obvious they were? And why does this happen so repetitively—why do they never admit they were wrong?

The answer is related to their ego; their very sense of self.

There is no use telling such people that they are at fault. You won't find any positive results from doing that.
Try to make distance with them. They are toxic in a way .. people think they can change this kind of person but no you can't. Maintaining distance is the greatest thing. Whatever they say just don't give importance or you can try to record proves but I'm pretty sure they will manipulate the truth again by saying something unreasonable.
Some even try to gaslight you!
I will give an example  and this is my own experience. A few days back some of the people who live upstairs to our flat, were doing some work on their balcony. They were installing grills on the parapet wall. The iron smith was soldering the grills on the parapet wall. The solder splatter was falling down in my balcony ( I used 'in ' because it is covered with iron grills and looked like a room, not exactly an open space).  Not one or two sparks but a whole lot of them, it was like fire spitting from a pipeline. I hung clothes in the balcony, a plastic sheet is covering the room of the grill, there are several plants in pots - anything could have caught  fire. I went up to complain. Then a lady came and when I told her what was happening, she vehemently denied that those sparks were falling down! "We are working inside, not outside", she blatantly lied, "you must have seen the light and thought they 're splatters"!
"Am I blind?" I asked her. "Your workers are working on the grill of the parapet wall, soldering it, and the hot spotters  are falling down. But still you are saying that it is just light, not splatters. Who are you trying to hoodwink?" 
But she continued to gaslight me. Meanwhile the workers came and told me not to worry as the work was over.
Ufff!
Some people have such a fragile ego, such brittle self-esteem, such a weak "psychological constitution," that admitting they made a mistake or that they were wrong is fundamentally too threatening for their egos to tolerate. Accepting they were wrong, absorbing that reality, would be so psychologically shattering that their defense mecahnisms do something remarkable to avoid doing so—they literally distort their perception of reality to make it (reality) less threatening. Their defense mechanisms protect their fragile ego by changing the very facts in their mind, so they are no longer wrong or culpable.
People who repeatedly exhibit this kind of behavior are, by definition, psychologically fragile. However, that assessment is often difficult for people to accept, because to the outside world, they look as if they’re confidently standing their ground and not backing down, things we associate with strength. But psychological rigidity is not a sign of strength, it is an indication of weakness. These people are not choosing to stand their ground; they’re compelled to do so in order to protect their fragile egos. Admitting we are wrong is unpleasant, it is bruising for any ego. It takes a certain amount of emotional strength and courage to deal with that reality and own up to our mistakes.
But when people are constitutionally unable to admit they’re wrong, when they cannot tolerate the very notion that they are capable of mistakes, it is because they suffer from an ego so fragile that they cannot sulk and get over it—they need to warp their very perception of reality and challenge obvious facts in order to defend their not being wrong in the first place.
Now how do you deal with such people? Experts give these options:
How to deal with people who go defensive ...
When you feel attacked, even the most humble person can be automatically locked into defense mode. It’s only natural.

But people who won't admit their mistakes tend to get defensive no matter how gently or positively you show them they could do something differently or better.

They just launch into counter-arguments or deflect the issue entirely. You can tell they didn’t put any thought or consideration into your feedback, because their responses often contradict each other. 

This is because they’re not speaking from their truth, they’re just digging for anything at all to fight back against what you said.  

People who are defensive usually have deep seated fear of judgement or rejection. They equate mistakes with personal inadequacy, so they try their hardest to maintain their self-image.

Understanding that defensiveness often masks insecurity can help us approach these people with more empathy. 

While it doesn’t make the conversation any less challenging, it can help you navigate it with a bit more understanding, knowing that you’re dealing with someone who’s likely fighting their own internal battles.

How to deal with stubborn people
We’ve all encountered that person who is as unyielding as a rock embedded in the earth. No matter what evidence you present or how rational your argument, they simply won’t budge. I’ve been stuck in these conversational loops myself, feeling more like I’m in a never-ending tug-of-war rather than a meaningful dialogue.
The underlying trait here is stubbornness. For people who exhibit this characteristic, admitting a mistake feels like yielding precious ground, undermining their sense of authority or self-assurance. The psychology behind stubbornness often revolves around issues of self-esteem and control. People who are stubborn may equate being right with being valuable.
The idea of being wrong shakes the very foundation of how they see themselves, leading them to hold onto their opinions with a vice-like grip.
When dealing with such individuals, it can be beneficial to focus less on “winning” the argument and more on opening a door for self-reflection. Using open-ended questions can sometimes coax them into examining their views without feeling cornered. For instance, instead of saying, “You’re wrong about this,” you might ask, “What leads you to see it that way?” This creates a safe space for discussion, and it may encourage them to eventually re-evaluate their stance.

Perfectionism: Ever met someone who seemed so focused on getting everything just right, it became almost paralyzing? 

This is what I struggled with a lot myself — and I’ll admit, it made me very reluctant to admit to my mistakes.

The thing is, perfectionism isn’t just about striving for excellence; it’s an obsessive need to avoid mistakes at all costs. For people trapped in this mindset, admitting a mistake feels like admitting they are deeply flawed. 

They believe their worth is tied to their performance, so any error, no matter how small, becomes a devastating blow to their self-esteem.

The irony is that perfectionism often leads to procrastination, indecision, and sometimes, complete inaction — because they fear making a mistake that will tarnish their record. 

In a way, the quest for perfection becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure, as their reluctance to act or decide can result in more significant errors.

If you’re dealing with  a perfectionist who won’t admit they’re wrong, understanding this internal struggle can help you approach the situation more empathetically. 

The key is to help them see that mistakes are not only inevitable but also valuable learning opportunities. 

Framing errors as stepping stones to mastery can sometimes help them lower their guard, making them more receptive to constructive feedback. 

And who knows? It might be the first step in breaking the shackles of their own impossible standards.

How to deal with control freaks

Ever find yourself in a situation where someone just can’t let go of the reins? I’ve felt that frustrating, stifling air around me, and honestly, it makes collaboration feel impossible.

People who have an insatiable need for control are often the ones who struggle the most with admitting mistakes. For them, control is a safety net, a way to manage the unpredictability of life. 

To admit a mistake would mean acknowledging that they’ve lost control, even if only for a moment, and that’s a terrifying prospect for them.

The need for control can manifest in various ways — from micromanaging tasks at work to dictating the flow of a casual conversation. 

These individuals have a specific idea of how things should go, and deviating from that script feels like setting the stage for chaos.

If you’re entangled with someone who can’t relinquish control, it’s tempting to push back, to wrestle the wheel away from them. But often, that only leads to more resistance. 

Instead, the goal should be to make them feel secure enough to loosen their grip voluntarily. 

This might mean assuring them that it’s okay to not have all the answers, or demonstrating that others are capable and can be trusted.

Remember, the need for control often stems from deeper insecurities and fears. Offering a safe space for vulnerability can sometimes crack open the door to admitting mistakes. 

It allows them to see that control is not the only way to find safety; sometimes, it comes through collaboration, learning, and yes—admitting when you’re wrong.

How to deal with people who lack empathy

You’ve probably crossed paths with someone who seems to live in their own bubble, utterly unaware of how their actions affect others. 

When it comes to mistakes and inconvenience, it’s as if these people are looking through a one-way mirror — they see out, but they don’t let anything in.

This trait is particularly looked down upon, because it directly impacts us. But when you get down to its root, it deserves our compassion just as much as all the others.

It often stems from not receiving enough love growing up, or being mistreated in a way that requires the person to “harden their shell” in order to protect themselves.

At the same time though, when people can’t or won’t put themselves in another’s shoes, they fail to see the full picture. 

So they may not grasp why they should apologize or make amends because they can’t emotionally connect with the harm they’ve caused.

Here’s the difficult part in dealing with them: You can’t force someone to be empathetic. Empathy often comes from a deep and emotional understanding of other peoples'  experiences, something that can be difficult to teach. 

However, you can set boundaries and communicate the impact of their actions clearly. Sometimes, making it about the ’cause and effect’ — rather than blame — can be an eye-opener.

Also, don’t underestimate the power of leading by example. People who lack empathy often haven’t had it modeled for them. 

By consistently demonstrating empathetic behaviour, you offer them a template for healthier, more compassionate interactions.

People who are manipulative: 

People who won’t admit to their mistakes are often experts at steering conversations and situations to their advantage. 

Their toolkit often includes techniques such as gaslighting, altering the narrative, or implicating others, all to dodge personal responsibility. 

It’s not about honesty or growth for them; it’s about keeping the upper hand.

We often brand these people as “toxic”, and the truth is, this behavior is indeed very hurtful. But it is also often learned as an unhealthy coping mechanism. 

To these people, mistakes feel so horrible that they need to find any way out of them — often not even realizing what they’re doing as a means to that end.

At the same time, obviously, this behavior is not okay, and by not indulging them, you help them stop and find a better way to cope.

If you’re dealing with someone showing these tendencies, it’s crucial to stick to the facts, remain unemotional, and set firm boundaries.  Manipulators struggle when there’s less room to twist the truth and when their emotional tricks fail to land. It can be tiring to handling manipulative individuals, but remember: your integrity is your best defense. 

When you’re confident in your version of events, their tactics lose power, and you maintain control of the situation.

I know this is very difficult to do.

I can understand. It is a strange world and you have to deal with all sorts of shit.  Keep away from that rubbish as far as possible. You cannot drain all your energies on toxic people all the time and waste your time too on them. So if possible move away from them. If this is not possible, try the techniques experts mentioned above and hope for the best.

Views: 12

Replies to This Discussion

11

RSS

Badge

Loading…

© 2024   Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service