Comments - How science is associated with aesthetics especially in relation to art - SCI-ART LAB2024-03-29T12:08:47Zhttps://kkartlab.in/profiles/comment/feed?attachedTo=2816864%3ABlogPost%3A84154&xn_auth=noEquations Are Art inside a Ma…tag:kkartlab.in,2014-03-06:2816864:Comment:1146532014-03-06T05:12:09.744ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p>Equations Are Art inside a Mathematician’s Brain<br></br> A brain area associated with emotional reactions to beauty activates when mathematicians view especially pleasing formulas<br></br> <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/equations-are-art-inside-a-mathematicians-brain/?&WT.mc_id=SA_MB_20140305" target="_blank">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/equations-are-art-inside-a-mathematicians-brain/?&WT.mc_id=SA_MB_20140305</a><br></br>
The experience of mathematical beauty…</p>
<p>Equations Are Art inside a Mathematician’s Brain<br/> A brain area associated with emotional reactions to beauty activates when mathematicians view especially pleasing formulas<br/>
<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/equations-are-art-inside-a-mathematicians-brain/?&WT.mc_id=SA_MB_20140305" target="_blank">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/equations-are-art-inside-a-mathematicians-brain/?&WT.mc_id=SA_MB_20140305</a><br/>
The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates - See more at: <a href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068/full#sthash.6VDmnhud.dpuf" target="_blank">http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068/full#sthash.6VDmnhud.dpuf</a></p> Science, of course, is not de…tag:kkartlab.in,2013-12-13:2816864:Comment:1125042013-12-13T03:51:41.113ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p>Science, of course, is not devoid of aesthetics. Buckminster Fuller, architect and designer, may have said that “if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong”, but that observation has been echoed by many scientists, including Nurse and Kroto (although Nurse has argued that ultimately data trumps all).…<br></br></p>
<p>Science, of course, is not devoid of aesthetics. Buckminster Fuller, architect and designer, may have said that “if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong”, but that observation has been echoed by many scientists, including Nurse and Kroto (although Nurse has argued that ultimately data trumps all).<br/> <a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/columnists/art-and-science-two-cultures-with-shared-values/2009746.article" target="_blank">http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/columnists/art-and-science-two-cultures-with-shared-values/2009746.article</a></p> http://motherboard.vice.com/b…tag:kkartlab.in,2013-05-31:2816864:Comment:1017192013-05-31T01:55:51.800ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p><a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/can-science-be-used-to-critique-art?goback=.gde_1636727_member_239969198" target="_blank">http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/can-science-be-used-to-critique-art?goback=.gde_1636727_member_239969198</a><br></br> My reply:<br></br> I have faced the situation of getting attracted to a particular art work in an art gallery. There are various reasons scientists give for this attractions. If you watch Dr. Ramachandran's videos on neuro-aesthetics, Dr Zeiki's ( I…</p>
<p><a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/can-science-be-used-to-critique-art?goback=.gde_1636727_member_239969198" target="_blank">http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/can-science-be-used-to-critique-art?goback=.gde_1636727_member_239969198</a><br/> My reply:<br/>
I have faced the situation of getting attracted to a particular art work in an art gallery. There are various reasons scientists give for this attractions. If you watch Dr. Ramachandran's videos on neuro-aesthetics, Dr Zeiki's ( I hope I got the spelling right) explanations you will get an idea why this happens. I use some scientific visually drawing methods to attract people to some of my works and I have succeeded and people tell me they get attracted to very unattractive themes I use like "Disease in a dish"! This is a challenge and science can make you overcome this challenge. So when people say scientific methods can also be used to critique art, they think they can do it. <br/>
--<br/>
Neurology as the basis for critique.<br/>
----<br/>
My reply: Anyway you can see all my work on my website <a href="http://www.kkartfromscience.com" target="_blank">http://www.kkartfromscience.com</a> and the specific work I mentioned here: <a href="http://www.kkartfromscience.com/pop-fromsce-25.9.11/as55.html" target="_blank">http://www.kkartfromscience.com/pop-fromsce-25.9.11/as55.html</a><br/>
You can watch Dr. Ramachandran's videos here: <a href="http://kkartlab.in/video/40-40-vision-lecture-neurology-and-the-passion-for-art" target="_blank">http://kkartlab.in/video/40-40-vision-lecture-neurology-and-the-passion-for-art</a><br/>
<a href="http://kkartlab.in/video/aesthetic-universals-and-the-neurology-of-hindu-art-vilayanur-s" target="_blank">http://kkartlab.in/video/aesthetic-universals-and-the-neurology-of-hindu-art-vilayanur-s</a><br/>
and read about Prof. Zeiki's work here: <a href="http://kkartlab.in/group/Research" target="_blank">http://kkartlab.in/group/Research</a><br/>
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=239969198&gid=1636727&trk=eml-anet_dig-b_nd-pst_ttle-cn&ut=3UqiNRrPZKpBM1" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=239969198&gid=1636727&trk=eml-anet_dig-b_nd-pst_ttle-cn&ut=3UqiNRrPZKpBM1</a></p> One part of our DNAofCreativi…tag:kkartlab.in,2013-05-28:2816864:Comment:1019522013-05-28T02:16:37.165ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p>One part of our DNAofCreativity.org project is called PolyAesthetics: Mapping the Muses or PAMM for short. <a href="http://dnaofc.weebly.com/pamm---polyaesthetic-mapping-the-muses.html" target="_blank">http://dnaofc.weebly.com/pamm---polyaesthetic-mapping-the-muses.html</a> . Please check out this approach taken by Kaz Maslanka. The premise of this team is to illuminate the idea that art and science do not live in a particular aesthetic category; instead art and science are composed of many…</p>
<p>One part of our DNAofCreativity.org project is called PolyAesthetics: Mapping the Muses or PAMM for short. <a href="http://dnaofc.weebly.com/pamm---polyaesthetic-mapping-the-muses.html" target="_blank">http://dnaofc.weebly.com/pamm---polyaesthetic-mapping-the-muses.html</a> . Please check out this approach taken by Kaz Maslanka. The premise of this team is to illuminate the idea that art and science do not live in a particular aesthetic category; instead art and science are composed of many aesthetic categories. The team explores what manifests from this premise as well as what other categories of aesthetics that we might discover. The PAMM system also explores the relationship of these other categories to art and science. Team PAMM has created a mathematical model that defines multiple aesthetic categories and helps to visualize those aesthetics differences within this mapping system. An added benefit is that this mapping system separates the aesthetics of science from the aesthetics of art to see the power of combining the two.</p>
<p>There is a video included with an explanation by Kaz and we have encouraged them to have their own website as well: <a href="http://polyamm.weebly.com/" target="_blank">http://polyamm.weebly.com/</a></p>
<p>A software application is being designed as a survey tool to map a variety of aesthetic expressions. The results will be displayed within a computer generated three dimensional Cartesian coordinate model. The viewer will be able to see the difference between how they judge the aesthetic category of a certain expression and compare that to the group demographics for the same expression. By challenging the definitions of aesthetics and how we normally look at it, this mapping will help assist artists and scientists as well as non‐artists and scientists to understand the nature of their personal aesthetic and how it relates to science, art and other aesthetic expressions.</p> Science isn't something that…tag:kkartlab.in,2013-05-28:2816864:Comment:1019512013-05-28T02:16:01.601ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p>Science isn't something that comes from somewhere to spoil the aesthetics of art. Science is the art of understanding why we feel the way we do when we see something wonderful and beautiful. It enhances the beauty of art by trying to understand it fully. The 'measurements' of science can also be used to 'criticize' art.</p>
<p>Science isn't something that comes from somewhere to spoil the aesthetics of art. Science is the art of understanding why we feel the way we do when we see something wonderful and beautiful. It enhances the beauty of art by trying to understand it fully. The 'measurements' of science can also be used to 'criticize' art.</p> PAMM INFORMATION VIDEO from…tag:kkartlab.in,2013-05-28:2816864:Comment:1018612013-05-28T01:59:17.300ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p><iframe frameborder="0" height="281" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/52993891?title=0&byline=0&portrait=0&color=700017" width="500"></iframe>
</p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/52993891">PAMM INFORMATION VIDEO</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user4310389">Kaz Maslanka</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.…</p>
<p></p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/52993891?title=0&byline=0&portrait=0&color=700017" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/52993891">PAMM INFORMATION VIDEO</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user4310389">Kaz Maslanka</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://dnaofc.weebly.com/pamm---polyaesthetic-mapping-the-muses.html" target="_blank">http://dnaofc.weebly.com/pamm---polyaesthetic-mapping-the-muses.html</a></p>
<p><a title=""></a><font size="5"><a title="" href="http://polyamm.weebly.com/" target="_blank">PAMM- PolyAesthetic Mapping: The Muses</a> Understanding the mechanics of aesthetics and its interplay within Art, Culture & Science</font></p> http://motherboard.vice.com/b…tag:kkartlab.in,2013-05-11:2816864:Comment:1011912013-05-11T03:04:13.095ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p><a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/can-science-be-used-to-critique-art" target="_blank">http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/can-science-be-used-to-critique-art</a><br></br> Can Science Be Used to Critique Art?<br></br> It's an old opposition: art and science. Not opposition in the sense of conflict, necessarily, but rather in the sense of one appearing without the other. On the face of it, art should transcend the inherent boundaries of scientific validity and truth-seeking. There are rules for…</p>
<p><a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/can-science-be-used-to-critique-art" target="_blank">http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/can-science-be-used-to-critique-art</a><br/> Can Science Be Used to Critique Art?<br/> It's an old opposition: art and science. Not opposition in the sense of conflict, necessarily, but rather in the sense of one appearing without the other. On the face of it, art should transcend the inherent boundaries of scientific validity and truth-seeking. There are rules for being a certain sort of art, but not so much for just being art itself, or for being objectively better art or carrying real meaning better or worse than other art.</p>
<p>So much cultural criticism is even designed to make fun of (or pick apart) the very idea that art (literature, music, etc.) can hold lasting truth. Whereas, science is only interested in things that are true, and it has designed highly rigorous ways of identifying truth in the world.</p>
<p>There's a very deep philosophical rabbit hole that comes along with this line of thinking, but let's just summarize the question as, Is aesthetic taste beyond the scope of science? In other words, can it be said with objectivity that the aesthetic of Celine Dion is worse than the aesthetic of, say, Beck?</p>
<p>Is there a fixed truth, a scientific truth, to that claim? Is that possible? In this snip of a recent Closer to Truth episode, physicist David Deutsch explains why the answer is actually yes. Philosophy, morals, art, and science are only separated from each other pragmatically. We simply haven't found the proper methods of bringing them together.</p>
<p>By <span class="author"><a href="http://motherboard.vice.com/author/MichaelByrne">Michael Byrne</a></span></p> tag:kkartlab.in,2013-05-11:2816864:Comment:1011202013-05-11T03:02:51.722ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YD-capWJMyc?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YD-capWJMyc?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</p> Great beauty and poetry resid…tag:kkartlab.in,2012-09-23:2816864:Comment:919782012-09-23T02:09:37.967ZDr. Krishna Kumari Challahttps://kkartlab.in/profile/DrKrishnaKumariChalla
<p>Great beauty and poetry reside within the theories woven by scientists. And that it is through the unification of art and science that these treasures can be fully explored and made accessible to the world at large.</p>
<p>Zachary Copfer</p>
<p>Great beauty and poetry reside within the theories woven by scientists. And that it is through the unification of art and science that these treasures can be fully explored and made accessible to the world at large.</p>
<p>Zachary Copfer</p> Constellation Orion, the nebu…tag:kkartlab.in,2012-09-21:2816864:Comment:918782012-09-21T20:49:08.354ZMilivoj Šeganhttps://kkartlab.in/profile/MilivojSegan
<p>Constellation Orion, the nebula's great horse, changed its terms, to which the pane imagination, Reality is something else, who knows what kind of time now (present) That probably no more and as far away in the linear perception of time in the unit rate light, So not a fact than fiction, scientists and sophisticated devices, so-called? :) My pic,The first three minutes..of reality,light!</p>
<p>That this gentleman just thought simply because it believes that Technosphere thoughts and is…</p>
<p>Constellation Orion, the nebula's great horse, changed its terms, to which the pane imagination, Reality is something else, who knows what kind of time now (present) That probably no more and as far away in the linear perception of time in the unit rate light, So not a fact than fiction, scientists and sophisticated devices, so-called? :) My pic,The first three minutes..of reality,light!</p>
<p>That this gentleman just thought simply because it believes that Technosphere thoughts and is programmed so that it works for him, he not watching Universe , but he obviously looking the so-called highly sophisticated technology solutions and its illusion of reality, as opposed to the artist and his imagination, observation without technologies perceive that all and not just the universe, or nucleus, DNA and the like? (-_o) But., and the an artist is the kind of people that when they do not think, or is totally devoid of mind, it can create brilliant work of art. Awareness of what is art not and unlearned mental categories. The so-called foolish man that even in such a literal concept, it can be ingenious artist, and does not harm anyone or say is deprived of liberty. Unlike the foolish person, if a scientist can inflict great harm and accidental and intentional, not yourself but to others as a rule so doing, before you cut off the ear (V Gogh) or kill (Mayakovsky :))? So I think, and so I feel my whole life as an artist supposed to be an artist and art can not be compared with anything as science say axiomatic illusion mathematical abstract geometric concepts that interpret the so-called Real physical world. She is completely different in itself, as work of art. kind, called a natural science :))!. Unable to handle the axiomatic dogma nor measured by any measurement units, as a science.? For example, just say the CGS system can not be applied to a work of art. For him, art is simply not nor will it ever be, a real measurement unit does not have the so-called good and bad art.? :)) From bad medicine or some other lodges scientific poetic work as I said, a lot of people could get hurt, and the art is not bad, because there simply was never proven or heard that somewhere someone is sick for example, because of kitsch which has from the beginning civilization, certainly throughout history yet nobody died? As an example of the invention and use, leverage, control fire, say a particular invention TNT, from whose legacy awarded the Nobel Prize, is not this just an indicator of paradox in parallel with the original concept, art? :) What is science, it can be easy to define, but it what is art, not never? :) Art is in comparing theory and non-swimmers about swimming. You can write not know any theory about swimming. Mark Spitz, about his phenomenon, and the writer or someone swimmer to read this book, if you do not know livati, when county prefects or nabijalu jump into deep water, it will immediately drown :) Well, no matter what kind of books written about the theoretical polvanju or read, if the swimmer is not very unlikely to stay alive, you experience no knowledge of maintenance of water or fear overcome?. So it is with the term supposedly practicing art? Already much of the first civilizations theorists who do not even know how to define art except that philosophers like Socrates art man considered lower human kind of spirit, and never deal with that? So I think, as he said, and Leonardo in his treatises: Those who do not practice a pragmatic art, mimesis you should not speak about it at all, let alone a theory? It's more philosophical territory, speculative category of the human psyche and the mind, it is not the only fixative concept, and paradigms, and the meaning of art, science is even easier to define the notion of truth? Contrast theistic dogma, all the science and art of finding a third times to be everything, and itself in the notion as of Descartes coordinate Interstate and ego, and the starting point of the universe and the quantum? He combined number stack geometry, both abstract concept in relation to the reality of itself, and nothing else, a sort of scientific illusion, as well as art?! Art is imagination,and a pragmatic IQ,and al ect.ect!!:))</p>
<p>Sazvježđe oriona,u maglici velikog konja,,mjenja svoje nazivlje,kako kome pane mašta,a stvarnot je nešto drugo,tko zna kakva u vremenu sad, (prezent) Toga vjerovatno više i nema, koliko je udaljeno u linearnom poimanju vremena u jedinici brzine svjetla,Dakle nije činjenica nego mašta,znanstvenika i sofisticiranih uređaja,takozvanih ? :))<br/>prve tri minute realnosti</p>
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2961180709?profile=original" target="_self"><img src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2961180709?profile=original" width="302" class="align-left"/></a></p>