It is difficult to manipulate and divert attention in science like they do in art to achieve success

There is another difference I want to point out between art and science.

Let me start with a real story. 

There is an actress. She is pretty, has a photogenic face, but can't act that well. 

So in the initial stages of her career, everybody criticized her and trolled her. She herself told this.  

So in order to survive in a highly competitive industry, she resorted to ''exposing" .  You know what I mean when I use this word in a glamorous field like cinema.

In this way she could successfully divert the attention of people  from her acting skills to her skin exposure. She became very glamorous. Youngsters loved this. Success followed. Meanwhile, she sharpened her acting skills too. Today she is a highly sought after actress. She said in one of her interviews that she did 'something right' to succeed in this way!

That is the art field for you! 

But you can't use such tactics in science to succeed!

You can't divert people's attention, because there is a strict method to follow and you can't circumvent this route to succeed. 

You deal with highly intelligent scientists who are 'hawk-eyed' all the time. 

You have to be honest. And if you don't know how to succeed using honesty, you have to go to 'class one' again to learn how to use intelligence, how to be honest, how to follow the scientific method, and how to be straightforward, how to connect things creatively and succeed.

I didn't find any other route to succeed here. 

Yes, there are people who go up in the ranks using alternative methods but they are not treated with respect and dignity in this field. 

Behind their backs these people are treated as back-stabbers.