Differences between art and science

Comment

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on March 7, 2012 at 8:46am

Reference1 Abstract to: Lewis Wolpert, The Unnatural Nature of Science, a talk at Art and Science: Two or Three Cultures? Interalia conference, University of Bristol, 27-28 February 1993.
Ref 2 Speaking about the Art/Sci initiative of the Wellcome Trust on Front Row, an arts magazine programme on BBC Radio 4, 7.20 pm, 21 July 1998.

Comment by Milivoj Šegan on February 29, 2012 at 4:17am

Yes, necessity is nevertheless a fact that must be Recognized that the so-called all .. Just an illusion, so maybe just a so-called imagination, and it is changing, constantly? As and  Nature Biosphere  also, and this is your domain, very creative,,as art!

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on February 28, 2012 at 8:58am

I read this somewhere and I feel this is interesting:

Creativity and innovation are useful. After they are tested. Before you know which one is going to be the “winner” idea, there are hundreds, even thousands of ideas that are terrible, bad, impractical, but “creative”. From the standpoint of resources, all the people that used their time/money following those ideas lost.

Comment by Milivoj Šegan on February 26, 2012 at 4:00pm

Essentially no difference, and if it has just learned from the category, namely the belief that there? This is usually called the axiomatic dogma. Kanon emerging there since the Renaissance, and especially the 17th century, Kant. Thus, the new canon culminated in 19/20 century. The so-called art, philosophy and science in the classical Greek conception of philosophy, experience catharsis in the so-called Rasselovom Paradox. arising from the second law of thermodynamics. Philosophy, Art and Science and God in him dead? Or we will disappear into infinity, or there will be a great collapse. Matter is expanding, inflationary categories in which we believe so because the apparatus gives results, Doppler effect therefore, the belief is the basis of all three forces and teističkog scientific approach, and art is always through all civilizations find a third way, post modern, so to say the concept of linear time never stops., as in previous encyclicals, neither in science nor in art. It's all in the same Basics!