Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication

About possible methods of promotion of fine art developments.

ART LAB allows me to communicate with greater ease

descriptions of assumptions and achievements on the sensitive topic of arts

descriptions, which could reach the attention of art critics.

However it is unlikely that my descriptions may be soon the attention

art critics, who in general handle the artistic directions with at least

some public recognition.

But there is hope, in terms of these descriptions, that may interest

spontaneously some groups of persons with the news that I present.

It seems that this event can not occur, the illusion of being dismantled

by existentialist philosopher Martin Heidegger:

…a character the way of all is to be ambiguous, nothing new is created does not appear to be find new sources" was already done by others. "Lack of authenticity: each first looks to others-that will tell others what they do others ... "

News in fine art appear to developments in rapid succession,

but those causes are few artistic movements.

Perhaps there are some researchers who are looking for value, similar

archaeologists passion that removes dust

with brush on the art objects made in

distant past, but they come out with great difficulty from the crowd.

First, I wanted me to know if and to what extent, assumptions and

conclusions of my studies, enroll in the context of current research.

We know that those over 300 scientific criteria developed

and applied by Google for ranking their sites, offering a huge fast

bibliographic fund, which far exceeds the possibilities of classic files

libraries.

I give an example of the effective application of these criteria:

Repeat one of my assumptions about Dioptical-bioptical perception where

I emphasize the dominant stage sensation relative to perception.

Posting area:

fine art dominant perception

is obtained:

Comments

I have accessed this page on 03/10/2013

Of about 33,000,000 results, Googel lie on the first

first page on the site which accesses the article entitled:

How a Fine Artist's Brain Dominance Allows Them to

Think and Perceive the World Creatively

Williams, Yahoo Contributor Network
MORE:

Right Brain

FlagPost a comment

(extras)

In order to understand how fine artists think and perceive the world, we must first try to define what a fine artist is and the cognitive processes in which they think. A fine artist is considered "someone who shows exceptional creativity or skill through aesthetic or conceptual means" (The Free Dictionary 2011). Given this basic definition, we must then consider what creativity is and why Artists are able to access and use it more than others. Creativity has been described as "a novel combination of two ideas, that seem improbable or unusual - the ability to create a being or form out of nothing (M.A.Boden 2004).

The Mini Brains

The Human Brain functions as two mini Brains that are made up of the right hemisphere and the left hemisphere. The right hemisphere is the less verbal side that controls the left side of the body, proven to control creative thinking, perception, spotting patterns, imagination and visualize

……………………………………

Place 2 (in second position) automatically sat Googel my website (Liviu Iliescu)

which accesses the article entitled:

Some considerations on the Dioptical-bioptical percepttion and art...

Most importantly appearing in my newspaper highlighted one stage

primary (before perception) awareness of sensationas opposed

the first article, where descriptions refer dominant perception.

This double selection seemingly contradictory relative to dominance

is evidence of effectiveness, application criteria stiincifice Googel,

in selecting and ordering a huge bibliography.

This result does not mean approval of the content of the two articles.

It can do, ultimately, art criticism.