Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication

Conceptual Art and the dominant feeling

I am of the opinion and agree with those who wrote that

every artist or lover of fine art feel maximum aesthetic pleasure, in generally,

from his own compositions the intellectual level of each ever made.

As I wrote during the creation of art lovers living moments of spiritual purity.

There are times when abandoned theories of art, when not taken into account

about mannerism and eclecticism and each creates fascinated by its artistic potential.

Certainly there and desire to communicate emotional states that they have lived it.

Success of communication action is dependent on many factors.

I am sitting in a class where art lovers experiencing the improvement of visual communication,

applying my knowledge in the field of optics.

But even in my case the success is limited by subjective factors

I think the compositions for both eyes (Dioptical-bioptical art)

can lead to substantial improvements in visual communication

Such compositions are part of the class which produces

disinterested aesthetic pleasure without practical utility or

produce disinterested aesthetic pleasure but also useful.

I propose a set of techniques (most are published on ART LAB)

which of course are not exhaustive

I hope that people trained and talented to develop this area.

One of the advantages of the techniques that we propose consists of

application in art criticism of the modality "variations on a theme"

used in music.

See link:

About interpretations or exegeses by means of bioptics

Extract

We know about "variations on a theme" in music. Variations are introduced in a certain theme in point of melody (to a certain extent), rhythm, relative values of the notes, harmony. Some composers are known to revive the works of other musicians, as a homage. It is also known that composers use to introduce cadences of their own in the concertos created by others.

...........................

Similarly I propose to apply the fine art interpretations for abstract compositions,

using techniques for both eyes (Dioptical-bioptical art)

So besides art criticism expressed by words, it introduces and interprets

through artistic means.

Fine art belongs to dominant affectivity, containing famous masterpieces

developed in terms of diversified and controversial art critics.

So without the unanimous recognition of their value.

While the rigor of science requires unanimous recognition.

This situation can be illustrated by believe if I believe

Conceptual art versus Formalism (see definitions in Wikipedia)

Thus are my closest criteria presented, the Conceptual art movement

which in essence can be expressed in a few sentences that we extracted from Wikipedia:

This method was fundamental to American artist Sol LeWitt's definition of

Conceptual art, one of the first to appear in print:

In conceptual art the idea or concept is the most important aspect of the work. When an artist uses a conceptual form of art, it means that all of the planning and decisions are made beforehand and the execution is a perfunctory affair. The idea becomes a machine that makes the art.^[2]

So I support the idea that the compositions of fine art must be brought

stimuli to emphasize the dominant sensation from perception

See blog:

Compositions of fine art in which it would be possible to observe t...

I present below a study in which I tried to introduce stimuli

for the dominant sensation.