Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
I found the text below is an introduction that makes Clark University
to present topics that provide University education
This topic is Professor Thomas Henry Huxley's vision of
the Connection Between Science and Art and Literature which he described in 1887
I think it is interesting for those it is a prophecy to developments in culture, which is
also in the topic proposed by ART LAB Dr. Krishna
Nature (May 1887)
 In his speech at the Royal banquet, Prof. Huxley offered some suggestive and interesting remarks on the relations between science on the one hand and art and literature on the other. "I imagine," he said, "that it is the business of the artist and of the man of letters to reproduce and fix forms of imagination to which the mind will afterwards recur with pleasure; so, based upon the same great principle by the same instinct, if I may so call it, it is the business of the man of science to symbolize, and fix, and represent to our mind in some easily recallable shape, the order, and the symmetry, and the beauty that prevail throughout Nature. I am not sure that any of us can go much further from the one to the other. We speak in symbols. The artist places his colours upon the wall; the colours have no relation to the actual objects, but they serve their purpose in recalling the emotions which were present when the scenes which they depict were acted. I am not at all sure that the conceptions of science have much more correspondence with reality than the colours of the artist have; but they are the symbols by which we are constantly recalling the order and beauty of Nature, and by which we by degrees force our way further and further into her penetralia, acquiring a greater insight into the mystery and wonder which are around us, and at the same time, by a happy chance, contributing to the happiness and prosperity of mankind. Referring to the fact that in these days scientific men are in danger of becoming specialists, occupied with a comparatively small field, Prof. Huxley maintained that the remedy lies in the recognition of "the great truth that art and literature and science are one, and that the foundation of every sound education and preparation for active life in which a special education is necessary should be some efficient training in all three." He concluded as follows:–ˆI sincerely trust, Sir, that, pondering upon these matters, understanding that which you so freely recognise here, that the three branches of art and science and literature are essential to the making of a man, to the development of something better than the mere specialist in any one of these departments–I sincerely trust that that spirit may in course of time permeate the mass of the people, that we may at length have for our young people an education which will train them in all three branches, which will enable them to understand the beauties of art, to comprehend the literature at any rate of their own country, and to take such interest not in the mere acquisition of science, but in the methods of inductive logic and scientific inquiry as will make them equally fit, whatever specialised pursuit they may afterwards take up. I see great changes; I see science acquiring a position which it was almost hopeless to think she could acquire. I am perfectly easy as to the future fate of scientific knowledge and scientific training; what I do fear is, that it may be possible that we should neglect those other sides of the human mind, and that the tendency to inroads which is already marked may become increased by the lack of the general training of early youth to which I have referred."
We live in an age where physicists and mystics often use many of the same words to describe an underlying reality that is often not obvious to the sense. Any "field" that represents things symbolically is ultimately dealing on some level or in some way with that which our perceived world springs from.
In my own life, I can relate to a fusion of science, literature, and art because my life has been divided into three segments where each of these was my focus. In my teens, I looked forward to being a theoretical physicist because of intense curiosity about physical reality and a gift for mathematics. In my 20's my focus shifted to writing, specifically complex metaphysical novels I thought consciousness was more at the root of reality than material energy, and literature is, in a sense, bits of consciousness captured on paper. Now I do 3D computer art, and because I am still driven by an urge to represent "reality" in the broadest way possible, or at least hint at it, I am working on a massive web art project representing states of consciousness through images. So, at various points in my life, I have looked to science, literature, and art to capture "reality" in so far as such a thing is possible.
Mr. David Camp
I thank you for attention to my discussion.
The Connection Between Science and Art and Literature is said
a thematic overview of the basis for education in Clark University
which I think are not mystics.
Good luck in your promise to represent "reality" as you write:
I am working on a massive web art project representing states of
consciousness through images.