Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
Image source: https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/prints/how.html
When you think of a criminal investigation, you might picture detectives meticulously collecting and analyzing evidence found at the scene: weapons, biological fluids, footprints and fingerprints. However, this is just the beginning of an attempt to reconstruct the events and individuals involved in the crime.
At the heart of the process lies the "principle of exchange" formulated by the French criminologist Edmond Locard in the early 1900s, which states that "every contact leaves a trace." The transfer of materials between the parties involved in a crime (the victim, the perpetrator, objects, the environment) forms the basis for reconstructing the events.
In Locard's time, these traces were typically things you could see with a magnifying glass or microscope, such as pollen, sand and fibers. However, such evidence is limited because much of it is not directly associated with a specific individual.
In our latest research published in Genes, we have shown how the population of bacteria on a person's skin leaves traces on the clothes they wear—and how these traces last for months and can be used to uniquely identify the wearer.
Imagine a crime scene where an investigator finds a victim and a piece of clothing that doesn't belong to them. Pollen or grains of sand might help the investigator find out where it came from, but what about identifying the owner of the clothing?
Skin cells, hairs and biological fluids are good contenders. However, another thing very specific to an individual is the unique community of microorganisms on and within their body.
These microbes are specific to different parts of the body, can persist over long periods of time and can be transferred to other people and to the environment. This makes them useful to address a variety of questions in forensics.
"Forensic microbiology" got its start in the early 2000s, as scientists set out to find ways to defend against bioterrorism. Today forensic microbiology is used to identify individuals after death, understand what their health was like before they died, determine how and why people have died, how long it has been since they died, and where they came from.
In a nutshell, today's update on Locard's principle is that "every contact leaves a microbiological trace."
While this principle has been established, we still want to know more about how much of an individual's microbiome is transferred to their surroundings. We also need to know how long it persists, and whether certain microbes may be more useful than others for identification.
We also want to understand how microbial traces may be contaminated by other items or the environment, and how different receiving surfaces affect microbial populations.
In 2021, two of the authors (Procopio and Gino) and colleagues at the University of Central Lancashire in the UK and the University of Eastern Piedmont in Italy first described the "touch microbiome"—the unique bacterial populations on individuals' skin. This work also studied how these bacteria could be transferred and persist for up to a month on non-porous surfaces, such as a glass slide, in uncontrolled indoor surroundings.
This team also analyzed DNA from samples belonging to dead bodies from old cases, which had been frozen for up to 16 years. They were able to identify specific populations of microbes linked to the manner of death and the decomposition stage of the bodies. This showed the microbial signature can be used to improve our understanding of cold cases when DNA extracts are still available.
In our most recent work, the third author (Magni) joined the collaboration to improve the potential of individual identification from clothes, items often collected as evidence at the crime scene.
In our study, cotton T-shirts were worn by two individuals for 24 hours in Australia. The T-shirts were then placed in a controlled environment for up to six months, alongside unworn items used as controls. Samples from both worn and unworn T-shirts were taken at various points in time and frozen.
The samples were then shipped (still frozen) to Italy for microbial DNA extraction. Next, sequencing was conducted in the UK, with the goal of identifying the microbial species present in the samples.
Results showed the two volunteers transferred distinct and recognizable microbes onto the clothing, each unique to the respective individual. Additionally, we could distinguish between worn and unworn items even after an extended period of time. The microbiome remained stable on the worn garments for up to 180 days.
We also observed the transfer of specific bacteria from the worn items to the unworn ones stored closest to them, showing the possibility of microbe transfer between items.
Clothes at any crime scene can provide key evidence for the investigation process.
They can aid in profiling individuals by revealing indicators of gender, occupation, income, social status, political, religious or cultural affiliations, and even marital status.
Additionally, they can provide clues regarding the manner of death, the location of the crime, and in certain cases, even support the estimation of the time since death.
Clothes play a crucial role in reconstructing events associated with the crime and establishing the identity of individuals involved.
Our research shows clothing can provide even more evidence. The discovery of unique microbiomes capable of identifying individuals from clothing marks a significant stride forward.
Noemi Procopio et al, Transferability of Human and Environmental Microbiome on Clothes as a Tool for Forensic Investigations, Genes (2024). DOI: 10.3390/genes15030375
Authors: Paola A. Magni, Noemi Procopio and Sarah Gino
This article is republished from THE CONVERSATION under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Tags:
13
The sexome's forensic potential: After intercourse, both partners leave traces of their own unique genital microbiome
Criminal investigations of heterosexual sexual assault often include a DNA analysis of the woman's genitals with the aim of identifying the presence of the perpetrator's sperm for proof of intercourse. However, in cases where no sperm is detected, including in assaults where the perpetrator uses a condom, these exams are often ineffective.
In research published in iScience on February 12, 2025, researchers show that bacterial species are transferred between both individuals during sexual intercourse, and these species can be traced to a sexual partner's unique genital microbiome.
The authors say that analyses of these genital microorganisms—which they called the "sexome"—may be useful in identifying perpetrators of sexual assault.
This research is based on the forensic concept that every contact leaves a trace.
In this study, the researchers confirmed that both men and women have unique populations of bacteria in their genital areas. They then recruited 12 monogamous, heterosexual couples to investigate whether these sexomes are transferred during sexual intercourse, including when a condom is used.
At the beginning of the study, each participant collected samples of their genital microbiome using swabs. The investigators used RNA gene sequencing to determine which bacteria strains were present—down to the sub-species level—and identified microbial signatures for each participant.
Couples were then asked to abstain from sex for varying lengths of time (from two to 14 days) and then to participate in intercourse. Afterwards, samples were collected again from each individual's genital microbiome. Analysis showed that a participant's unique bacterial signature could be identified in their sexual partner's sample following intercourse.
Three of the couples reported using a condom. The analysis found that although this did have some impact on the transfer of microbial content, it did not inhibit it entirely.
When a condom was used, the majority of transfer occurred from the female to the male.
This shows promise for a means of testing a perpetrator post-assault and means there may be microbial markers that detect sexual contact even when a condom was used.
The investigators also looked at whether males were circumcised and whether the participants had pubic hair, but found that neither factor seemed to affect the transfer of bacterial species between partners. However, they did find that the makeup of the vaginal microbiome changed during menstruation, which they note could affect results.
You can escape from police and law but you cannot escape from science and scientists. Can you?
Bacterial transfer during sexual intercourse as a tool for forensic detection, iScience (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111861. www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext … 2589-0042(25)00121-X
© 2025 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by