Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication

In the ancient times when scientific knowledge was not so prolific, people used to come up with silly reasons and causes that arose in minds that are filled with fear of the unknown when they saw anything unusual happening around them.   Now too some people live in the same stage. 

But people with a scientific and rational minds will think and come up with facts that effect the things that happen around them. There lies the difference. The second set of people help the world get a relief from fear and agony the world faces because of 'unknown' factors effecting it.

A recent incident that has happened in a Manchester museum is one such thing that showed the difference between the first set of people ( ordinary ) and the second set (people of science).

An ancient Egyptian statue which sparked whispers of an ancient curse when it was found to be turning on its axis inside its display case at a museum wasn't cursed after all, a mystery solver told. An expert from a ITV show says his evidence of external vibrations turning the 10-inch tall statue is conclusive.

People at Manchester Museum were puzzled by the statuette which - a video showed - seemed to spin itself through 180 degrees without anyone touching it. The 10-inch tall statue of Neb-Sanu, which dates back nearly 4,000 years and was found in a mummy's tomb, has been at the Museum for 80 years. The time-lapse video showed it turning during the day, apparently of is own volition. During the night, however, it remained still.

An Egyptologist at the museum, Mr. Campbell  Price, then suggested the museum may have been struck by ancient curse. According to him, when he noticed that it had turned around, he thought it was strange because it is in a case and he was the only one who has the key to it. He put it back but again the next day it had moved again.  People at the museum set up a time-lapse video and, although the naked eye can't see it, one can clearly see it rotate on the film. The statuette is something that used to go in the tomb along with the mummy.  In ancient Egypt they believed that if the mummy is destroyed then the statuette can act as an alternative vessel for the spirit. "Maybe that is what is causing the movement" according to the people at the museum!


Not really!

Because  scientists entered the scene to check things and give an explanation based on facts. Professor Brian Cox, who teaches Physics at the Manchester University, came up with this theory: We think it is differential friction, where two surfaces - the serpentine stone of the statue and glass shelf  it is on - cause a subtle vibration which is making the statuette turn.

Then ITV's MysteryMap programme seems to have solved the conundrum, backing Professor Cox's explanation. Their expert Steve Gosling put three-axis vibration sensors under the cabinet, and found a peak vibration level - coinciding with movement from passers-by and traffic from the very busy Oxford Road nearby.

According to Mr. Gosling " The vibration is a combination of multiple sources so there are buses outside on the busy road, there is footfall activity. And it is all of those things combined. This statue has a convex base. There is a lump at the bottom which makes  it more susceptible to vibrations than others which have a flat base. This is conclusive!"

And  Neb-Sanu's spinning days have come to an end as a  conservation-grade membrane has now been affixed to the base of this statuette and other objects to prevent movement in future.

So who is correct? Who is fearless? And who is going forward? The answers to all these questions are obvious!

Trust science to make your lives free from fears and  make them fun and worth living!

Story source: The Independent with other inputs from Sci-Art Lab



Another ancient story debunked by science: The curses that weren't curses at all!

In 1922, British archaeologist Howard Carter found what he'd spent the last six years searching for: King Tutankhamun's tomb. It was nestled in the Valley of the Kings near Luxor, Egypt and its treasures are still considered one of archaeology's most legendary finds.

But Carter's glory and fame came at a price: On the day Carter opened the tomb, a snake killed his canary. Some of the Egyptian staff regarded it as a "warning from the spirit of the departed King against further intrusion on the privacy of his tomb," the New York Times reported.

Rumors continued to swirl of a mummy curse that Carter had unleashed, especially when people associated with the excavation started dying.

However, as decades passed and more members of Carter's team died, scientists began to wonder if there was a much more mundane reason for the deaths.

The tomb of Tutankhamun and the first death attributed to the curse

In April 1923, George Herbert, 5th Earl of Carnarvon, lay feverish and coughing in a Cairo hospital. When he died on April 5, the lights in the city went out, LiveScience reported.

Back at his home in Hampshire, England, Lord Carnarvon's dog, Susie, died within a few hours of when he succumbed.

The NYT listed cause of death as pneumonia, triggered by an infected insect bite he had cut while shaving. But because he'd been present at the opening of Tutankhamun's tomb a few months prior, rumors of a curse started to swirl.

Lord Carnarvon's NYT obituary noted that even before he was ill, "there had been talk of curses laid by the ancient Egyptians, with mystic incantations, on any who dared disturb the sleep of a Pharaoh."

A day after Carnarvon's death, the paper quoted spiritualist and Sherlock Holmes creator Sir Arthur Conan Doyle as saying "a malevolent spirit may have caused Lord Carnarvon's fatal illness."

Around the same time, however, Sir Ernest A. Wallis Budge of the British Museum described the curse theories as "bunkum" to the NYT.

The many deaths connected to Tutankhamun's curse

Whispers of the curse continued when American financier George Jay Gould died in May 1923 of pneumonia, a few months after visiting the tomb, per JSTOR.

And Philip Livingston Poe, a relative of Edgar Allen Poe, also caught pneumonia a few months after visiting the tomb in 1923. His illness made the papers and was connected to the "Mummies' Curse," though he lived another 47 years.

When Richard Bethell, Howard Carter's secretary, died in 1929, various reports said he was either the ninth, tenth, or thirteenth person associated with the excavation to die.

In total, the number of deaths that newspapers attributed to the curse ranged from nine to over 20, depending on whether you include visitors to the tomb and excavators' relatives.

The wide range of deaths attributed to the curse included those killed in car accidents, shootings, a house fire, and those who took their own lives. Some had never visited the tomb and were merely related to someone who had.

Despite the Western media's voracious appetite for this mummy curse notion, it was very rare for Western newspapers to include Egyptians' deaths in their curse coverage. One of the few was Ali Kamel Fahmy Bey, who reportedly visited the tomb. In 1923, his wife shot and killed him at the Savoy Hotel in London, and a sensational trial followed.

But dozens of Egyptian laborers contributed physical and skilled labor to excavate Tutankhamun's tomb. Because Carter never named most of them in his notes, and they were rarely mentioned in the press, it's difficult to know how clearing millennials-old dust and debris affected their health.

The curse of the fungi?

As the decades passed, some scientists wondered if there was something deadly lurking in Tutankhamun's tomb: fungi.

Two physicians published a letter in The Lancet in 2003 stating that Aspergillus, a common mould, could have sickened Lord Carnarvon.

Aspergillosis can cause coughing, shortness of breath, but it's more serious for those who have weakened immune systems. Lord Carnarvon originally began visiting Egypt after a serious car accident in 1903 damaged his lungs, which would have made him especially susceptible to the mould.

For a 2013 study, Harvard University researchers looked at brown spots found on the walls of Tutankhamun's tomb, which were present when Carter first unsealed the tomb. The microbiologists wanted to determine if fungi or other microbes were responsible for the spots and posed a health risk to visitors.

While the analysis found evidence of fungal communities and bacteria, they were no longer active and posed no threat to visitors or the paintings.

It's impossible to say if Aspergillus or any other fungi contributed to Lord Carnarvon's or Gould's deaths. Today, archaeologists wear gloves, masks, and sometimes a disposable clothing barrier to protect themselves from mould and fungi, according to "Dangerous Places: Health, Safety, and Archaeology."

Perhaps the most mundane explanation of the curse comes from Frank McClanahan, a physician who treated Lord Carnarvon during his illness in Luxor. The deaths are a small number of the many who visited the tomb.

"[T]here were archaeologists coming and going all the time from all parts of the world," he said in a 1972 interview. "If you took any large crowd of people and checked back later, you would find a certain percentage of deaths among them."

Yes, and if people try to connect unconnected things and attribute all these deaths to 'curses'? What about those who visited the tombs and didn't die immediately or suffered any loss? People don't talk about them at all! But spread stories only about those who die. Strange!

Sources: Science Alert and Business Insider

Views: 691

Replies to This Discussion


© 2024   Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service