Science and Art - Bioptical Art

Comment

Comment by Liviu Iliescu on May 6, 2012 at 3:05pm

Dear Marcel
If you follow the instructions you'll find that Bioptical Art allows people,a mixture of psycho-physical color: with an eye one sees a color
and the other another color.
  I apply color fusion Helmholtz

Comment by Marcel Charest on May 6, 2012 at 2:21pm

I accept that a scientific understanding of Bioptical Art is very "direct to the point", meaningful, useful. But I tempted more by  an artistic approach. When I began to use colors, they tried to make us learn by heart the art of mixing colors. By my years of experience, I am still learning the art of mixing colors, not solely by heart. 

Comment by Marcel Charest on May 5, 2012 at 6:35pm

Dear Milivoj,about art and science and philosophy,

   I am curious to read what you can write about the difference between truth and reality.

Comment by Milivoj Šegan on May 5, 2012 at 12:28pm

6. RIEMANN'S SQUARE, from the cycle Break Euclidean window, 2008., Lumuno mobile digital picture, here is denying the Pythagorean theorem

Comment by Milivoj Šegan on May 5, 2012 at 12:10pm

Dear friend Liviu ,all is ok. I love argue about the so-called art, most notably by the formulas of the so-called science that tries to create the illusion of knowledge about art. This road leads to some kind of sect, as Pythagorean . (-_-) Here's my digital shot, work, which is a recording Ilusion that disproves the Pythagorean theorem . This my shot of the light beam, and showing evident going from black square (the so-called concept of individual areas of nuclear Sat, nothing , zero, the quantum theory of space forces) All is games and imagination, known about a reality , there is very questionable.?? Every man with his five senses is a scientist, he said, brave Hubbel. And so the artist's every man (Original) I think!Every man is true to himself and not single formula(so-called knowledge ) what is the Truth ?!And as a professional senior conservator, in the maintenance of decay that is analytical material carriers and their variability, unstoppable, a lot of sensationalism in the so-called evaluation, and knowledge about art.
The essence of each and not just a work of art. And so are very valuable your work. Lots thanks to you,and conversation the controversy the arts and sciences. To You and All in Art lab, Best Regards!

Comment by Liviu Iliescu on May 5, 2012 at 8:44am

Dear friends Milivoj and Marcel

I thank you for your messages.
I am not prepared to comment on the foundations of philosophy
Aesthetics is an important area in philosophy and the names,

disinterested interest, art as sensorial experience, art dependent knowledge
are chapters devoted, which states the assumptions philosophers.

Comment by Milivoj Šegan on May 5, 2012 at 3:07am

Dear SirLivi uIliescu,my Art Lab Friend,

What is art?! aesthetics and ethics are not, so what do you think that science, knowledge of art, so-called .. or what you said Leonardo
De Vinci (Vinci is the before notion of Moses culture, as oday's Serbia .. Vinca)? Art can speak only one who I practiced mimesis. practices, (Treatise) nature is and than our 5 senses and nothing more,every man. so called living man and inanimate bein ??!!

Comment by Marcel Charest on May 5, 2012 at 1:51am

The science of History searches what was closest to reality, not necessarily the truth as in a moral code.  Philosophy is also a science; I think it is the science of sciences; it is more about reality than the truth; there is a small difference. It does not mean that philosophy does not tell the truth. Philosophy is the spirit that thinks about itself; it is very easy to fall in a vicious circle because in order to fully understand your spirit, you must get out of it, like a problem you can't solve because your in it. I don't know anybody that can do that.

Comment by Liviu Iliescu on May 4, 2012 at 8:42pm

 Dear Milivoj Segan

It is difficult for me to following you. Yours considerations belong to a topics that I do not know.     Philosophy is  an area where the   magma of       intelligence, boils emitting assumptions  underlying  the many ways  in finding the truth.

  A title of what I do, would be following:

 

The modalities that I propose may be valorised by arousing a wider interest, if the fine art artists, by using traditional techniques and their talent, will create complex compositions with bioptical stimuli. On one hand, Bioptical Art will bring developments in research of psychology, neurology and psychiatry, and, on the other hand, it will give possibilities to the field of aesthetics to supplement chapters such as: disinterested interest, art as sensorial experience, art dependent knowledge and others.

  Please help me in terms of possible additions to the chapters the aesthetic, which I repeat:

 

, …..on the other hand, it will give possibilities to the field of aesthetics to supplement chapters such as: disinterested interest, art as sensorial experience, art dependent knowledge and others.

Comment by Milivoj Šegan on May 4, 2012 at 9:28am

FOR THOSE who first heard ORIGINS OF PHILOSOPHY
Philosophy of origins, because all the matrix based on the complementary polar rnosti fourfold, which is the main paradigm of Philosophy origin. So our brain works! My sketch drawings of the segments of the complementary pair, black ~ white squared, Upgrading of the theory of black squares, Malevich's Suprematism starting point for me is not round, all so-called universe emerged from a similar perception of the squares, space, as we interpret it in mind .that tends to see a circle, but there is a problem not solvable chirality, mirror?? Lower right shows a sketch of the asymmetry term real ~ Lens, in contrast to this, which is symmetrical in all directions and the diagonal, and the problem lies in the irrational, diagonal squares of the mind, the number Pi, Archimedes' constant or Ludolfov number π ≈ 3.14159   http://www.ishodiste.com/index.php option=com_content&task=view...

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• Next ›
• Page