Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
Asteroids are rocky-metallic objects which range in size from about the size of pebbles to around 600 miles (~1,000 km) across.
Visitors from space
Art work by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa
(http://www.kkartfromscience.com )
The solar system is full of millions of bits and pieces, remnants of its heyday of activity 4.5 billion years ago. Planets are the most noticeable fossil leftovers. There’s also a vast assortment of far smaller bodies, from asteroids to cometary nuclei, all swirling around the Sun in a variety of orbits. The best known are the diminutive members of the Asteroid Belt, a zone between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter where millions of objects reside. The ‘belt’ of asteroids is thick, not confined to a thin band, orbits are strongly tilted, bodies belong to groups and families – the signs of earlier events, collisions, and gravitational hijinks.
Sometimes these asteroids get disturbed and are let loose from their orbits by the gravitational impacts of heavenly objects. Various dynamical groups of asteroids have been discovered orbiting in the inner Solar System. Their orbits are perturbed by the gravity of other bodies in the Solar System and by the Yarkovsky effect {a force acting on a rotating body in space caused by the anisotropic emission of thermal photons, which carry momentum. It is usually considered in relation to meteoroids or small asteroids (about 10 cm to 10 km in diameter), as its influence is most significant for these bodies}.
Now and then we keep hearing that asteroids as big as X number of soccer fields giving Earth big scares. People get worried and ask questions like can't science do anything about them? I myself faced these questions. And my replies to all the worried people is, "science is trying its best". Then again people want to know how scientists can do this.
Here is how:
By passing the intelligent life test...
The biggest key to deflecting dangerous asteroids, researchers say, is detecting them with plenty of lead time to take appropriate action.
We need to make sure we can rise to the challenge when a big, threatening asteroid shows up on our radar, according to space scientists. Civilization's very survival depends on it.
"If there is a community of intelligent life out in the universe ... those intelligent beings will have already conquered this challenge. Our entrance exam to that community of intelligent life is to pass this test."
This is what we mean by the 'passing the intelligent life test!
Asteroid impact avoidance comprises a number of methods by which near Earth objects (NEO) could be diverted, preventing potentially catastrophic impacts. A sufficiently large impact by an asteroid or other NEOs would cause massive tsunamis , fire-stroms , and (by placing large quantities of dust into the stratosphere, blocking sunlight) impact weather and even a combination of several apocalyptic events. A collision between the Earth and an approximately 10-kilometre-wide object 65 million years ago is believed to have produced the Chicxulub Crator and the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event , widely held responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs.
While the chances of such an event are no greater now than at any other time in history, there is a very high chance that one will happen eventually. Recent astronomical events—such as the Shoemaker - Levy impacts on Jupiterand the 2013 RussianChelyabinsk meteor along with the growing number of objects in space around the Earth —have drawn renewed attention to such threats, and advances in technology have opened up new possible options to deflect them from impact with the Earth.
When a meteor exploded over Chelyabinsk, Russia sometime back, the world’s space agencies found out along with the rest of us, on Twitter and YouTube. That is completely unacceptable in this advanced age of science and tech.
The Earth’s nations must work together to combat this extraterrestrial threat.
If a big asteroid with Earth’s name on it were to reach us unimpeded, well, we could go the way of the dinosaurs. So a group of astronauts is advising the U.N. on a plan to protect the planet.
“This is taking responsibility for the survival of life on planet Earth.”
Recently, the General Assembly approved a preliminary set of asteroid defense measures
First step: Defending against dangerous asteroids is to find them. There are 100 times more asteroids out there than we have found. There are about 1 million asteroids large enough to destroy larger cities on the earth . Our challenge is to find these asteroids first before they find us. So Early warning is important because it increases the chance of being able to deflect a threatening asteroid once it is found. If a spacecraft struck an asteroid 5 or 10 years before the rock was due to hit Earth, a slight orbital alternation should be enough to make it pass Earth by; if the asteroid wasn’t detected soon enough, evacuating the impact zone may be the only option available.
The strategy adopted could depend on the size and path of the asteroid
Next : The U.N. plans to set up an “International Asteroid Warning Group” for member nations to share information about potentially hazardous space rocks. If astronomers detect an asteroid that poses a threat to Earth, the U.N.’s Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space will help coordinate a mission to launch a spacecraft to slam into the object and deflect it from its collision course.
Collision avoidance strategies Various collision avoidance techniques have different trade-offs with respect to metrics such as overall performance, cost, operations, and technology readiness. There are various methods for changing the course of an asteroid/comet. These can be differentiated by various types of attributes such as the type of mitigation (deflection or fragmentation), energy source (kinetic, electromagnetic, gravitational, solar/thermal, or nuclear), and approach strategy (interception, rendezvous, or remote station). Strategies fall into two basic sets: destruction and delay.
The first step is to find them first. That is not easy. Because most of them are very small and dark. The best way to find these asteroids is to have many telescopes scanning the sky at once, and, fortunately, NASA does have such a program. Run through the agency's Planetary Defense Coordination Office, the program uses a large network of telescopes to scan the skies. These instruments, however, are optimized to search for much larger asteroids, which would have a catastrophic impact across huge regions of Earth. NASA's focus right now for near-Earth objects is on cataloging 90 percent of asteroids that are larger than 460 feet (140 m) wide and that will come to within about 4.65 million miles (7.48 million km) of Earth, or about 20 times the distance from Earth to the moon, according to the agency. The largest estimate for 2018 GE3 would make it only about three-fourths that size.
Destruction concentrates on rendering the impactor harmless by fragmenting it and scattering the fragments so that they miss the Earth or burn up in the atmosphere.
Collision avoidance strategies can also be seen as either direct, or indirect. The direct methods, such as nuclear bombs or kinetic impactors, violently intercept the bolide's path. Direct methods are preferred because they are generally less costly in time and money. Their effects may be immediate, thus saving precious time. These methods might work for short-notice, or even long-notice threats, from solid objects that can be directly pushed, but probably not effective against loosely aggregated rubble piles. The indirect methods, such as gravity tractors, attaching rockets or mass drivers, laser cannon, etc., will travel to the object then take more time to change course up to 180 degrees to fly alongside, and then will also take much more time to change the asteroid's path just enough so it will miss Earth.
Many NEOs are "flying rubble piles" only loosely held together by gravity, and a deflection attempt might just break up the object without sufficiently adjusting its course. If an asteroid breaks into fragments, any fragment larger than 35 m across would not burn up in the atmosphere and itself could impact Earth. Tracking the thousands of fragments that could result from such an explosion would be a very daunting task.
Delay exploits the fact that both the Earth and the impactor are in orbit. An impact occurs when both reach the same point in space at the same time, or more correctly when some point on Earth's surface intersects the impactor's orbit when the impactor arrives. Since the Earth is approximately 12,750 km in diameter and moves at approx. 30 km per second in its orbit, it travels a distance of one planetary diameter in about 425 seconds, or slightly over seven minutes. Delaying, or advancing the impactor's arrival by times of this magnitude can, depending on the exact geometry of the impact, cause it to miss the Earth.
Nuclear explosive device
We have several different techniques at our disposal to move killer asteroids away from Earth. Here's a brief rundown of the possible arrows in our planetary defense quiver.
To deflect them or smash them into smaller pieces so that they don't pose a threat: given a certain size of asteroid and a certain size nuclear bomb, if the bomb blew the asteroid to smithereens, the smithereens would burn up in the atmosphere. Or using a spacecraft depending on how big the asteroid is or the size of Spacecraft . Wouldn't it shatter the asteroid and create more little pieces and also lead into more asteroids coming into earth.
Depending on how much notice we get, a small ionic thruster could deflect an asteroid likely to have a probability of hitting the earth. Remember, we aren't trying to push it sideways, but rather to either speed it up or slow it down so that the intersection time and place changes.
A while back Japan successfully tested a giant space-gun in Gifu Prefecture. They`re going to attach this extremely powerful laser to a satellites in the name of, "drilling asteroids for minerals and energy wealth." Any laser capable of drilling into the face of a fast moving, and extremely distant flying foreign object, surely is powerful enough to pin-point earth targets at ease.
Using the the gravity tractor:
If researchers detect a potentially dangerous space rock in plenty of time, the best option may be to send a robotic probe out to rendezvous and ride along with it.
The spacecraft's modest gravity would exert a tug on the asteroid as the two cruise through space together. Over months or years, this "gravity tractor" method would pull the asteroid into a different, more benign orbit.
Mirror bees' and foil wrap:
While we're pretty sure that gravity tractors and kinetic impactor probes would work, researchers are also looking into several other ideas.
There's the "mirror bee" concept, for example, which would launch a swarm of small, mirror-bearing spacecraft to a dangerous asteroid. These mini-probes would aim reflected sunlight at one spot on the space rock, heating it up so much that rock is vaporized, creating propulsive jets. "The reaction of that gas or material being ejected from the asteroid would nudge it off-course."
Using Lasers:
Powerful laser blasts could vaporize portions of a hazardous comet's surface from afar, causing the eruption of gaseous jets that would push the icy wanderer off its original trajectory.
So scientists are trying their best to save our planet. Avoiding asteroid impact is definitely on their minds. They have several options right now and I am sure they will do appropriate things when the time comes to act. So, folks, don't lose your sleep because of asteroid impact fear.
Tags:
518
The B612 Foundation – an organization devoted to the monitoring and mitigation of harmful asteroid impacts on Earth
https://b612foundation.org/list-of-impacts-from-impact-video/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/11283886/Mountain-siz...
--
https://www.rt.com/news/329211-russia-europe-space-defense/
Russian scientists believe that, at the present time, a nuclear explosion set off close to a dangerous asteroid remains the most effective means to change its trajectory, and thus escape the impact, TASS news agency reported on Saturday.
Although international space treaties in force prohibit nuclear weapons in space at present, if an asteroid posed a real threat to life on our planet, “such bans are naturally going to be dropped,” Russia’s International Scientific Community Central Engineering Research Institute (TsNIIMash) told the agency.
Researchers stressed that the safest way to influence an asteroid’s orbit is in outer space, a good deal prior to the space wanderer’s expected collision with Earth.
“In this case a nuclear blast is conducted in such a way that the asteroid does not disintegrate into smaller pieces,” explain Russian space experts. The explosion would force the ejection of material from the space body’s surface, creating sufficient thrust to affect the its trajectory and sidetrack it to a safe orbit.
NEOShield is an international consortium that addresses the threat of impacts to Earth, hoping to avert the fate of the dinosaurs. Largely funded by the European Commission, it has gathered researchers from Germany, France, Britain, Spain, Russia, and the US.
The project’s primary aim is to investigate in detail the three most promising asteroid threat-reduction techniques: kinetic impactors, gravity tractors, and the explosive blast-deflection method.
TsNIIMash has been participating in NEOShield’s project. The institute is a part of Russia’s Roskosmos space agency specializing in the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles, air defense missiles, and their propulsion units.
Russia’s 2016-2025 federal space program includes a measure establishing a national space center dedicated to detecting potential threats from asteroids and comets.
Four Nebosvod-S (Welkin) satellites will be commissioned to monitor near-Earth space threats. Two of them will be planetary sentries on a circumterrestrial orbit and two others will be delivered to Earth’s circumsolar orbit.
The satellites will be capable of spotting space objects measuring several meters across.
NASA has been running the Near Earth Objects (NEO) program, which identifies and monitors asteroids, comets, and large space rock fragments that could be potentially dangerous to Earth, since 1998. As of September 2014, it had identified more than 11,000 objects bigger than 140 meters across, which only amounts to about 10 percent of NASA’s stated goal: to catalogue 90 percent of all near-Earth objects by 2020.
In December of 2015, Russia’s Emergency Ministry reported that there will be 11 occasions when large asteroids come in hazardous proximity to Earth within the next 35 years.
The earliest one is expected on October 12, 2017, when asteroid 2012 TC4, estimated to be 17 meters in diameter, will shoot past Earth within the Moon’s orbit, missing our planet by a mere 115,000 kilometers – which is less than a third of the distance from Earth to the Moon (385,000 kilometers).
Asteroid 1950 DA is heading towards Earth at a very fast rate and the collision might end the life on the planet, it has been reported.
Asteroid which has 1,000 metres in diameter could 'smash' into the planet at nearly 40,000 miles per hour, which could cause an explosion of unprecedented proportions, triggering huge tsunamis capable of covering entire cities, the Daily Star reported.
NASA classes any asteroid with a diameter of over 50 metres as a potential "city-killer". The rock has been hurtling through space so fast that it has experienced "negative gravity".
Alarmingly the rock has a 300/1 chance of striking Earth with the current predicted impact placed at March 16, 2880. Around 66m years ago a giant asteroid crashed down in Mexico, wiping out the last of the dinosaurs as well as most of the planet's plant life.
-NASA
----
We can all sleep more soundly tonight - NASA has opened a new office to track asteroids and comets that come too close to Earth.
The Planetary Defense Coordination Office (PDCO) formalizes the agency’s existing program for detecting and tracking near-Earth Objects (NEOs). The office is located within NASA’s Planetary Science Division, which is in the agency's Science Mission Directorate in Washington.
ADVERTISEMENT
Related: NASA nixes asteroid threat rumor
“The office will be responsible for supervision of all NASA-funded projects to find and characterize asteroids and comets that pass near Earth's orbit around the sun,” said NASA, in a statement. “It will also take a leading role in coordinating interagency and intergovernmental efforts in response to any potential impact threats.”
The space agency explained that more than 13,500 near-Earth objects have been discovered to date – more than 95 percent of them since NASA-funded surveys began in 1998. About 1,500 NEOs are now detected each year, according to NASA.
"Asteroid detection, tracking and defense of our planet is something that NASA, its interagency partners, and the global community take very seriously," said John Grunsfeld, associate administrator for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, in the statement. "While there are no known impact threats at this time, the 2013 Chelyabinsk super-fireball and the recent 'Halloween Asteroid' close approach remind us of why we need to remain vigilant and keep our eyes to the sky."
NASA has been working on planetary defense for some time – its Near-Earth Object Observations Program already works with astronomers and scientists around the world to look for asteroids that could harm Earth. The office will build on the agency’s existing efforts, working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other federal agencies and departments.
“In addition to detecting and tracking potentially hazardous objects, the office will issue notices of close passes and warnings of any detected potential impacts, based on credible science data,” explained NASA, in its statement. “The office also will continue to assist with coordination across the U.S. government, participating in the planning for response to an actual impact threat, working in conjunction with FEMA, the Department of Defense, other U.S. agencies and international counterparts.”
Given their cataclysmic potential it’s hardly surprising that asteroids remain a source of fascination for many people. Last August NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory nixed rumors swirling around the Internet of an asteroid impact between sometime between Sept. 15 and 28, 2015.
NASA also has an ambitious plan to capture and redirect an asteroid.
New York: NASA has started a new programme called the Planetary Defence Coordination Office (PDCO) which will coordinate the space agency's efforts to detect and track near-Earth objects (NEOs), a media report said.
Most asteroids and comets in our solar system are small and stay safely in orbit within the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.
Others, however, are large enough to do damage and are in orbits that bring them close enough to our planet, Techcrunch.com reported.
In order to protect the Earth from these potential hazards, the PDCO has two main roles. First, it is responsible for finding and characterising these NEOs. Second, the PDCO is in charge of coordinating emergency efforts with other agencies and governments if a large NEO was predicted to impact the Earth.
In preparation of an impact of considerable size, NASA has long-term planetary defence goals that include the development of asteroid deflection technologies. So far, effective asteroid deflection strategies have not been decided upon, let alone developed.
NASA, however, said that it has an asteroid impact and deflection mission concept in the works with the European Space Agency. This mission, "if pursued" (funded), would "demonstrate an impact deflection method," the space agency said.
In the event of an unavoidable asteroid impact, PDCO would work in partnership with FEMA, the Department of Defence, and other US agencies and international counterparts to coordinate emergency efforts.
NEO encounters by themselves are not rare events, but usually they are small enough to burn up in our atmosphere. Between 1994 and 2013, NASA measured 556 bolide (bright explosion caused by an asteroid impact) events.
But the notable exception was the 2013 Chelyabinsk event (the large yellow dot in Russia on the map) which was the largest asteroid to hit the Earth during this time period.
The scary part was that NASA wasn't aware of the Chelyabinsk asteroid because it was relatively small (about 19 metres, in diametre) and in the weeks before it hit us it was too close to the Sun, making it difficult to detect.
http://www.ibnlive.com/news/tech/nasa-launches-new-programme-to-def...
One of the most infamous near-Earth asteroids is held together by forces other than just gravity and friction. Researchers have found that asteroid (29075) 1950 DA is a loose blob of particles that clot together much as Moon dust collects on astronauts’ spacesuits.
Any mission to divert an asteroid on a collision course with Earth would need to take these newfound cohesive forces into account, suggest the findings, published in Nature on August 14. This means that gently nudging an asteroid onto a new trajectory is potentially a safer option than blasting it to smithereens.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/near-earth-asteroid-held-...
----
London :The discovery of hundreds of giant comets in the outer planetary system over the last two decades means that these objects pose a much greater hazard to life on Earth than asteroids, scientists say.
The giant comets, termed centaurs, move on unstable orbits crossing the paths of the massive outer planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.
The planetary gravitational fields can occasionally deflect these objects in towards Earth, according to a team of astronomers from Armagh Observatory and the University of Buckingham in UK.
Centaurs are typically 50 to 100 kilometres across, or larger, and a single such body contains more mass than the entire population of Earth-crossing asteroids found to date.
Calculations of the rate at which centaurs enter the inner solar system indicate that one will be deflected onto a path crossing Earth’s orbit about once every 40,000 to 100,000 years, researchers said.
Whilst in near-Earth space they are expected to disintegrate into dust and larger fragments, flooding the inner solar system with cometary debris and making impacts on our planet inevitable.
Known severe upsets of the terrestrial environment and interruptions in the progress of ancient civilisations, together with our growing knowledge of interplanetary matter in near-Earth space, indicate the arrival of a centaur around 30,000 years ago.
This giant comet would have strewn the inner planetary system with debris ranging in size from dust all the way up to lumps several kilometres across.
Specific episodes of environmental upheaval around 10,800 BC and 2,300 BC identified by geologists and palaeontologists are also consistent with this new understanding of cometary populations, researchers said.
Some of the greatest mass extinctions in the distant past, for example the death of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, may similarly be associated with this giant comet hypothesis, they said.
“In the last three decades we have invested a lot of effort in tracking and analysing the risk of a collision between Earth and an asteroid,” said Professor Bill Napier from the University of Buckingham.
“Our work suggests we need to look beyond our immediate neighbourhood too, and look out beyond the orbit of Jupiter to find centaurs. If we are right, then these distant comets could be a serious hazard, and it’s time to understand them better,” said Napier.
The researchers have also uncovered evidence from disparate fields of science in support of their model.
For example, the ages of the sub-millimetre craters identified in lunar rocks returned in the Apollo programme are almost all younger than 30,000 years, indicating a vast enhancement in the amount of dust in the inner Solar system since then.
The research was published in the journal Astronomy and Geophysics.
--
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-stop-an-incoming-...
What would we do if we spotted a hazardous asteroid on a collision course with Earth? Could we deflect it safely to prevent the impact?
Last year, NASA's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission tried to find out whether a "kinetic impactor" could do the job: smashing a 600kg spacecraft the size of a fridge into an asteroid the size of an Aussie Rules football field.
Early results from this first real-world test of our potential planetary defense systems looked promising. However, it's only now that the first scientific results are being published: five papers in Nature have recreated the impact, and analyzed how it changed the asteroid's momentum and orbit, while two studies investigate the debris knocked off by the impact.
The conclusion: "kinetic impactor technology is a viable technique to potentially defend Earth if necessary".
Our solar system is full of debris, left over from the early days of planet formation. Today, some 31,360 asteroids are known to loiter around Earth's neighborhood.
Although we have tabs on most of the big, kilometer-sized ones that could wipe out humanity if they hit Earth, most of the smaller ones go undetected.
Just over ten years ago, an 18-meter asteroid exploded in our atmosphere over Chelyabinsk, Russia. The shockwave smashed thousands of windows, wreaking havoc and injuring some 1,500 people.
A 150-meter asteroid like Dimorphos wouldn't wipe out civilization, but it could cause mass casualties and regional devastation. However, these smaller space rocks are harder to find: we think we have only spotted around 40% of them so far.
Suppose we did spy an asteroid of this scale on a collision course with Earth. Could we nudge it in a different direction, steering it away from disaster?
Hitting an asteroid with enough force to change its orbit is theoretically possible, but can it actually be done? That's what the DART mission set out to determine.
Specifically, it tested the "kinetic impactor" technique, which is a fancy way of saying "hitting the asteroid with a fast-moving object".
The asteroid Dimorphos was a perfect target. It was in orbit around its larger cousin, Didymos, in a loop that took just under 12 hours to complete.
The impact from the DART spacecraft was designed to slightly change this orbit, slowing it down just a little so that the loop would shrink, shaving an estimated seven minutes off its round trip.
For DART to show the kinetic impactor technique is a possible tool for planetary defense, it needed to demonstrate two things:
that its navigation system could autonomously maneuver and target an asteroid during a high-speed encounter
that such an impact could change the asteroid's orbit.
In the words of Cristina Thomas of Northern Arizona University and colleagues, who analyzed the changes to Dimorphos' orbit as a result of the impact, "DART has successfully done both".
The DART spacecraft steered itself into the path of Dimorphos with a new system called Small-body Maneuvering Autonomous Real Time Navigation (SMART Nav), which used the onboard camera to get into a position for maximum impact.
More advanced versions of this system could enable future missions to choose their own landing sites on distant asteroids where we can't image the rubble-pile terrain well from Earth. This would save the trouble of a scouting trip first!
Dimorphos itself was one such asteroid before DART. A team led by Terik Daly of Johns Hopkins University has used high-resolution images from the mission to make a detailed shape model. This gives a better estimate of its mass, improving our understanding of how these types of asteroids will react to impacts.
The impact itself produced an incredible plume of material. Jian-Yang Li of the Planetary Science Institute and colleagues have described in detail how the ejected material was kicked up by the impact and streamed out into a 1,500km tail of debris that could be seen for almost a month.
Streams of material from comets are well known and documented. They are mainly dust and ice, and are seen as harmless meteor showers if they cross paths with Earth.
Asteroids are made of rockier, stronger stuff, so their streams could pose a greater hazard if we encounter them. Recording a real example of the creation and evolution of debris trails in the wake of an asteroid is very exciting. Identifying and monitoring such asteroid streams is a key objective of planetary defense efforts such as the Desert Fireball Network we operate from Curtin University.
So how much did the impact change Dimorphous' orbit? By much more than the expected amount. Rather than changing by seven minutes, it had become 33 minutes shorter!
This larger-than-expected result shows the change in Dimorphos' orbit was not just from the impact of the DART spacecraft. The larger part of the change was due to a recoil effect from all the ejected material flying off into space, which Ariel Graykowski of the SETI Institute and colleagues estimated as between 0.3% and 0.5% of the asteroid's total mass.
The success of NASA's DART mission is the first demonstration of our ability to protect Earth from the threat of hazardous asteroids.
At this stage, we still need quite a bit of warning to use this kinetic impactor technique. The earlier we intervene in an asteroid's orbit, the smaller the change we need to make to push it away from hitting Earth. (To see how it all works, you can have a play with NASA's NEO Deflection app.)
But should we? This is a question that will need answering if we ever do have to redirect a hazardous asteroid. In changing the orbit, we'd have to be sure we weren't going to push it in a direction that would hit us in future too.
However, we are getting better at detecting asteroids before they reach us. We have seen two in the past few months alone: 2022WJ1, which impacted over Canada in November, and Sar2667, which came in over France in February.
We can expect to detect a lot more in future, with the opening of the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile at the end of this year.
More information: R. Terik Daly et al, Successful Kinetic Impact into an Asteroid for Planetary Defense, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05810-5
Andrew F. Cheng et al, Momentum Transfer from the DART Mission Kinetic Impact on Asteroid Dimorphos, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05878-z
Cristina A. Thomas et al, Orbital Period Change of Dimorphos Due to the DART Kinetic Impact, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05805-2
Jian-Yang Li et al, Ejecta from the DART-produced active asteroid Dimorphos, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05811-4 Ariel
Graykowski et al, Light Curves and Colors of the Ejecta from Dimorphos after the DART Impact, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05852-9
by Eleanor K. Sansom
Humanity could use a nuclear bomb to deflect a massive, life-threatening asteroid hurtling towards Earth in the future, according to scientists who tested the theory in the laboratory by blasting X-rays at a marble-sized "mock asteroid".
The biggest real-life test of our planetary defenses was carried out in 2022, when NASA's fridge-sized DART spacecraft smashed into a 160-metre (525-feet) wide asteroid, successfully knocking it well off course.
But for bigger asteroids, merely crashing spaceships into them will probably not do the trick.
When the roughly 10-kilometer wide Chicxulub asteroid struck the Yucatan peninsula around 66 million years ago, it is believed to have plunged Earth into darkness, sent kilometers-high tsunamis rippling around the globe and killed three quarters of all life—including wiping out the dinosaurs.
We humans are hoping to avoid a similar fate.
There is no current threat looming, but scientists have been working on how to stave off any big asteroids that could come our way in the future.
A leading theory has been to be blow them up with a nuclear bomb—a last-ditch plan famously depicted in the 1998 sci-fi action movie "Armageddon".
For a proof-of-concept study published in the journal Nature Physics this week, a team of US scientists worked on a much smaller scale, taking aim at a mock asteroid just 12 millimeters (half an inch) wide.
To test whether the theory would work, they used what was billed as the world's largest X-ray machine at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
The machine is capable of generating "the brightest flash of X-rays in the world using 80 trillion watts of electricity".
Much of the energy created by a nuclear explosion is in the form of X-rays. Since there is no air in space, there would be no shockwave or fireball.
But the X-rays still pack a powerful punch.
For the lab experiment, the X-rays easily vaporized the surface of the mock asteroid.
The vaporizing material then propelled the mock asteroid in the opposite direction, so that it effectively "turned into a rocket engine".
It reached speeds of 250 kilometers an hour, "about as fast as a high-speed train".
The test marked the first time that predictions about how X-rays would affect an asteroid had been confirmed.
It really proves this concept could work.
The scientists used modeling to scale up their experiment, estimating that X-rays from a nuclear blast could deflect an asteroid up to four kilometers wide—if given enough advanced notice.
The biggest asteroids are the easiest to detect ahead of time, so "this approach could be quite viable" even for asteroids the size of the dinosaur-killing Chicxulub.
However, in order for it to work, there must be enough time after a mission for the extra push of velocity to move the asteroid's trajectory off Earth, say the scientists.
Nathan Moore, Simulation of asteroid deflection with a megajoule-class X-ray pulse, Nature Physics (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02633-7. www.nature.com/articles/s41567-024-02633-7
© 2024 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Powered by