SCI-ART LAB

Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication

Q: How can we control elephants that are  destroying our crops?

Krishna: We ourselves are responsible for this behaviour of elephants. We are destroying their home i.e., forests. We are occupying and building things in their pathways. They have no other go but to take over our lands now.

Protecting their habitats is the most important way to keep elephants away from us. 

However, in some countries people are following certain things to keep elephants away from their crops.

Elephants are afraid of bees. Yes, you heard it right. Such big elephants are afraid of small bees. 

Elephants are so terrified of this tiny insect that it will flap its ears, stir up dust and make noises when it hears the buzz of a beehive. Of course, a bee’s stinger can’t penetrate the thick hide of an elephant. But when bees swarm – and bees swarm aggressively – hundreds of bees might sting an elephant in its most sensitive areas, the trunk, mouth and eyes. And they hurt. The threat of bees is so intensely felt by elephants that conservationists are using it to help prevent the kinds of conflict between them and us.

In recent years, researchers and advocates have persuaded farmers to use the elephant’s fear of bees as a potential fence line to protect crops. By stringing beehives every 20 meters – alternating with fake hives – a team of researchers in Africa has shown that they can keep 80 percent of elephants away from farmland.

Asian elephants are also afraid of bees, though perhaps less so. It’s the first step towards showing that the control strategy can also work in countries such as SriLanka, India, Nepal and Thailand, where Asian elephants are 10 times more endangered than their African cousins.

In Africa, Save the Elephants, a nonprofit conservationist group, builds wire and beehive fences at roughly one-fifth the cost of an electrified fence. The farm gets protection against elephants and a modest new source of income from a twice-a-year honey harvest. 

The fences also serve as a psychological barrier for the farmers, making them think twice before slashing and burning more forest for farmland. The beehive fences are being used or tested in some countries in Africa and Asia.

Beehive fence ( Picture source: Google images)

Q: Are there some extreme living things on Earth? 

Krishna: We have extremophiles.  They are organisms that live in "extreme environments," under high pressure and temperature. Bacteria often form on the rocks near the hydrothermal vents. 

Researchers found bacteria in Yellowstone National Park's hot springs too. Bacteria living in the area were thriving at extraordinarily high temperatures. The newly named Thermus aquaticus lived in water that was nearly 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100 degrees Celsius) -- practically boiling!

Since they live in “extreme environments” (under high pressure and temperature), they can tell us under which range of conditions life is possible.

The unique enzymes used by these organisms, called "extremozymes," enable these organisms to function in such forbidding environments. These creatures hold great promise for genetically based medications and industrial chemicals and processes.

It's important to note that these organisms are 'extreme' only from a human perspective. While oxygen, for example, is a necessity for life as we know it, some organisms flourish in environments with no oxygen at all.

­Extremophiles aren't just bacteria. They come from all three branches of the three domain classification system: Archaea, Eubacteria and Eukaroyta (1). 

The microorganism Ferroplasma aci­diphilum ­needs a large amount of iron to survive, quantities that would kill most other life forms.

Then there are Radiotrophic fungi which appear to perform radiosynthesis, that is, to use the pigment melanin to convert gamma radiation into chemical energy for growth. This proposed mechanism may be similar to anabolic pathways for the synthesis of reduced organic carbon (e.g., carbohydrates) in phototrophic organisms, which convert photons from visible light with pigments such as chlorophyll whose energy is then used in photolysis of water to generate usable chemical energy (as ATP) in photophosphorylation or photosynthesis. 

Radiotrophic fungi were discovered in 1991 growing inside and around the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine showed that three melanin-containing fungi—Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Wangiella dermatitidis, and Cryptococcus neoformans—increased in biomass and accumulated acetate faster in an environment in which the radiation level was 500 times higher than in the normal environment. Exposure of C. neoformans cells to these radiation levels rapidly (within 20–40 minutes of exposure) altered the chemical properties of its melanin, and increased melanin-mediated rates of electron transfer (measured as reduction of ferricyanide by NADH) three- to four-fold compared with unexposed cells. Similar effects on melanin electron-transport capability were observed by the authors after exposure to non-ionizing radiation, suggesting that melanotic fungi might also be able to use light or heat radiation for growth.

Radiotrophic fungi (Image source: Wikipedia) 

Different names given to extremophiles based on their preferred living conditions ...

  • Acidophile: likes acidic environments (low pH)
  • Alkaliphile: likes alkaline environments (high pH)
  • Anaerobic extremophile: thrives in areas without oxygen; some cannot grow where there is oxygen.
  • Cryophile: loves extremely cold temperatures
  • Piezophile/barophile: likes high pressures
  • Psychrophile: flourishes in low temperatures
  • Thermophile: does well in temperatures of 104 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees Celsius) or higher
  • Hyperthermophile: blooms at temperatures of 176 degrees Fahrenheit (80 degrees Celsius) or higher
  • Xerophile: likes environments with little water

NASA found  an extremophile, Deinococcus radiodurans, which is extremely resistant to radiation. This microbe can withstand doses of radiation 500 percent higher than would be lethal to humans (2). Interestingly, the radiation actually does break the microbe's DNA into pieces. But in many cases, the DNA can reassemble and work normally again. It accomplishes this by shedding broken parts of DNA, using a special enzyme to attach good DNA to other still-healthy pieces of DNA, and then creating complementary pieces to­ bond to these newly formed long DNA strands. Understanding how D. radiodurans does this could allow scientists to bring dead cells back to life. For NASA, harnessing this DNA-resistance could offer clues for building better spacesuits or spacecraft.

Q: How can we control weeds using natural techniques?

Krishna: Heard about allelopathy? 

Some plants are very successful in the competition for space, nutrients, and water. They inhibit the growth of their competitors by chemical signals that cause cells of the neighboring plant to die. Scientists are studying this effect for potential use in environmentally compatible bioherbicides.

The phenomenon that no other plants grow near a walnut tree and that wild garlic and mint displace their neighbours. This chemical warfare is referred to as allelopathy by experts.

In most cases, this effect in the target plant is caused by chemical signals rather than poisons. While wild garlic and mint are immune to the effect of their chemcial signals, biological communication triggers self-controlled cell death in the neighbouring plant. Scientists think that this mechanism of plant communication may lead to the development of novel, environmentally compatible bioherbicides that specifically affect a certain type of weed without damaging the useful crop (3).

Q: Why is corona virus spreading so easily by people despite some precautions?

Krishna: There are various reasons. The most important ones are the nature of symptoms. 

Some people are asymptomatic carriers. They don't show any symptoms but spread the disease. 

Recent studies suggest as many as 80% or more of those infected are “silent carriers”, showing no or very mild symptoms.

It seems children and young, healthy people are more likely to be asymptomatic.

And this disease is spread even two days before the symptoms develop (because of high viral load) in people with symptomatic carriers.

Because of this this is being spread very rapidly. That is why WHO says test, test, test, test. 

Testing and isolation are best to control these types of diseases.

Q: Can herd immunity protect us from COVID 19? On person is suggesting that as Indian population is young , we can use herd immunity. What do you think?

Krishna: May be at later stages, not now. 

Just opinions don't count in science. 

I disagree with this person's opinions because even younger people are dying. Age is not the only criteria for death with regard to this pandemic..  There are several  other reasons to consider and I wrote on this. Even young people are prone to heart conditions and BP because of their lifestyles. Genetic factors are another reason. The route by which a virus enters the body also influences infection outcome.    The virulence of the virus.  Which infections the immune system has fought in the past.  
 Taken together, these variables create a complex picture. The amount of virus, our genes, the route of infection, the variety of the virus and our immunological history combine to produce outcomes ranging from asymptomatic infection to death. And because these parameters can vary so much from infected person to infected person, it’s impossible to predict who will live and who will die. 

Herd immunity should always come from vaccines for deadly infections like COVID19, not from the disease itself. 

 Some Epidemiologists argue that in order to get heard immunity for any new disease , in most  cases, 80 to 95 percent of the population must be immune to the disease to stop its spread. So if we don’t have a vaccine – as we don’t for COVID-19 – achieving herd immunity would require a significant proportion of the population to be infected and recover from COVID-19. The percentage of the population that needs to be immune to enable herd immunity depends on how transmissible a disease is. This is measured by the term R0, which is how many new infections each case will generate. For COVID-19, the R0 is estimated to be 3.28, though studies are still ongoing and this number will probably change. This means that for herd immunity, about 70% of the  population would need to be immune to COVID-19. If atleast 70% of the population is allowed to get the disease ( that figure will be in millions for India) and   current estimates are that COVID-19 has a 2.3% case-fatality rate and a 19% rate of severe disease. This means that achieving herd immunity to COVID-19 in any country for that matter  could result in the deaths of  millions of people with a further several million severe infections requiring critical care overwhelming the health care system. 

With atleast  70% of the population getting the infection and millions dying from it, will there be any meaning to herd immunity afterwards? What would you be doing with it? Even if you get immunity, you won't be able to tell now how long it would last. What about reinfections? 
What if the virus gets  mutated after we achieve herd immunity? (Although we know that this virus is a bit stable one and doesn't mutate frequently)
Is the risk worth taking?
(The page with the above link also deals with this question)
If this person took only age as consideration to express his opinion, that is what some experts call 'partial picture paralysis' (PPP). 
Q: From the same person who asked the above Q ... Regarding vaccination, in a country of 1.34 billion people, even if we vaccinate half a million a day, it will take more than 5 years to vaccinate 70% of the present population. This is not considering the cost and time taken to produce vaccine. We do need some solution in the meanwhile.
Krishna: We need not cover so many people (1.3 billion). Some would have acquired immunity by getting the (natural) infection. We have to cover only those who didn't get it. By the time we get the vaccine, many people would have already acquired immunity by getting the disease. So don't worry.
Billions of people around the world  are getting vaccine shots for various diseases. It is achievable.

References:

1. https://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/extreme/index.html

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinococcus_radiodurans

3. https://phys.org/news/2020-04-mint-scent-inhibits-growth-weeds.html...

Views: 77

Replies to This Discussion

RSS

Badge

Loading…

© 2024   Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service