Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
JAI VIGNAN
All about Science - to remove misconceptions and encourage scientific temper
Communicating science to the common people
'To make them see the world differently through the beautiful lense of science'
Members: 22
Latest Activity: 7 hours ago
WE LOVE SCIENCE HERE BECAUSE IT IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING
THIS IS A WAR ZONE WHERE SCIENCE FIGHTS WITH NONSENSE AND WINS
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
"Being a scientist is a state of mind, not a profession!"
"Science, when it's done right, can yield amazing things".
The Reach of Scientific Research From Labs to Laymen
The aim of science is not only to open a door to infinite knowledge and wisdom but to set a limit to infinite error.
"Knowledge is a Superpower but the irony is you cannot get enough of it with ever increasing data base unless you try to keep up with it constantly and in the right way!" The best education comes from learning from people who know what they are exactly talking about.
Science is this glorious adventure into the unknown, the opportunity to discover things that nobody knew before. And that’s just an experience that’s not to be missed. But it’s also a motivated effort to try to help humankind. And maybe that’s just by increasing human knowledge—because that’s a way to make us a nobler species.
If you are scientifically literate the world looks very different to you.
We do science and science communication not because they are easy but because they are difficult!
“Science is not a subject you studied in school. It’s life. We 're brought into existence by it!"
“A society that loses science loses the future.”
Links to some important articles :
1. Interactive science series...
a. how-to-do-research-and-write-research-papers-part 13
b. Some Qs people asked me on science and my replies to them...
Part 6, part-10, part-11, part-12, part 14 , part- 8,
part- 1, part-2, part-4, part-5, part-16, part-17, part-18 , part-19 , part-20
part-21 , part-22, part-23, part-24, part-25, part-26, part-27 , part-28
part-29, part-30, part-31, part-32, part-33, part-34, part-35, part-36, part-37,
part-38, part-40, part-41, part-42, part-43, part-44, part-45, part-46, part-47
Part 48, part49, Critical thinking -part 50 , part -51, part-52, part-53
part-54, part-55, part-57, part-58, part-59, part-60, part-61, part-62, part-63
part 64, part-65, part-66, part-67, part-68, part 69, part-70 part-71, part-73 ...
.......306
BP variations during pregnancy part-72
who is responsible for the gender of their children - a man or a woman -part-56
c. some-questions-people-asked-me-on-science-based-on-my-art-and-poems -part-7
d. science-s-rules-are-unyielding-they-will-not-be-bent-for-anybody-part-3-
e. debate-between-scientists-and-people-who-practice-and-propagate-pseudo-science - part -9
f. pseudoscience
g. How Science is demolishing patriarchal ideas - part-39
2. in-defence-of-mangalyaan-why-even-developing-countries-like-india need space research programmes
3. Science communication series:
a. science-communication - part 1
b. how-scientists-should-communicate-with-laymen - part 2
c. main-challenges-of-science-communication-and-how-to-overcome-them - part 3
d. the-importance-of-science-communication-through-art- part 4
e. why-science-communication-is-getting worse - part 5
f. why-science-journalism-is-not-taken-seriously-in-this-part-of-the-world - part 6
g. blogs-the-best-bet-to-communicate-science-by-scientists- part 7
h. why-it-is-difficult-for-scientists-to-debate-controversial-issues - part 8
i. science-writers-and-communicators-where-are-you - part 9
j. shooting-the-messengers-for-a-different-reason-for-conveying-the- part 10
k. why-is-science-journalism-different-from-other-forms-of-journalism - part 11
l. golden-rules-of-science-communication- Part 12
m. science-writers-should-develop-a-broader-view-to-put-things-in-th - part 13
n. an-informed-patient-is-the-most-cooperative-one -part 14
o. the-risks-scientists-will-have-to-face-while-communicating-science - part 15
p. the-most-difficult-part-of-science-communication - part 16
q. clarity-on-who-you-are-writing-for-is-important-before-sitting-to write a science story - part 17
r. science-communicators-get-thick-skinned-to-communicate-science-without-any-bias - part 18
s. is-post-truth-another-name-for-science-communication-failure?
t. why-is-it-difficult-for-scientists-to-have-high-eqs
u. art-and-literature-as-effective-aids-in-science-communication-and teaching
v.* some-qs-people-asked-me-on-science communication-and-my-replies-to-them
** qs-people-asked-me-on-science-and-my-replies-to-them-part-173
w. why-motivated-perception-influences-your-understanding-of-science
x. science-communication-in-uncertain-times
y. sci-com: why-keep-a-dog-and-bark-yourself
z. How to deal with sci com dilemmas?
A+. sci-com-what-makes-a-story-news-worthy-in-science
B+. is-a-perfect-language-important-in-writing-science-stories
C+. sci-com-how-much-entertainment-is-too-much-while-communicating-sc
D+. sci-com-why-can-t-everybody-understand-science-in-the-same-way
E+. how-to-successfully-negotiate-the-science-communication-maze
F+ no-emotions-are-not-the-only-answer-for-sci-com-success
4. Health related topics:
a. why-antibiotic-resistance-is-increasing-and-how-scientists-are-tr
b. what-might-happen-when-you-take-lots-of-medicines
c. know-your-cesarean-facts-ladies
d. right-facts-about-menstruation
e. answer-to-the-question-why-on-big-c
f. how-scientists-are-identifying-new-preventive-measures-and-cures-
g. what-if-little-creatures-high-jack-your-brain-and-try-to-control-
h. who-knows-better?
k. can-rust-from-old-drinking-water-pipes-cause-health-problems
l. pvc-and-cpvc-pipes-should-not-be-used-for-drinking-water-supply
m. melioidosis
o. desensitization-and-transplant-success-story
p. do-you-think-the-medicines-you-are-taking-are-perfectly-alright-then revisit your position!
q. swine-flu-the-difficlulties-we-still-face-while-tackling-the-outb
r. dump-this-useless-information-into-a-garbage-bin-if-you-really-care about evidence based medicine
s. don-t-ignore-these-head-injuries
u. allergic- agony-caused-by-caterpillars-and-moths
General science:
a.why-do-water-bodies-suddenly-change-colour
b. don-t-knock-down-your-own-life-line
c. the-most-menacing-animal-in-the-world
d. how-exo-planets-are-detected
e. the-importance-of-earth-s-magnetic-field
f. saving-tigers-from-extinction-is-still-a-travail
g. the-importance-of-snakes-in-our-eco-systems
h. understanding-reverse-osmosis
i. the-importance-of-microbiomes
j. crispr-cas9-gene-editing-technique-a-boon-to-fixing-defective-gen
k. biomimicry-a-solution-to-some-of-our-problems
5. the-dilemmas-scientists-face
6. why-we-get-contradictory-reports-in-science
7. be-alert-pseudo-science-and-anti-science-are-on-prowl
8. science-will-answer-your-questions-and-solve-your-problems
9. how-science-debunks-baseless-beliefs
10. climate-science-and-its-relevance
11. the-road-to-a-healthy-life
12. relative-truth-about-gm-crops-and-foods
13. intuition-based-work-is-bad-science
14. how-science-explains-near-death-experiences
15. just-studies-are-different-from-thorough-scientific-research
16. lab-scientists-versus-internet-scientists
17. can-you-challenge-science?
18. the-myth-of-ritual-working
19.science-and-superstitions-how-rational-thinking-can-make-you-work-better
20. comets-are-not-harmful-or-bad-omens-so-enjoy-the-clestial-shows
21. explanation-of-mysterious-lights-during-earthquakes
22. science-can-tell-what-constitutes-the-beauty-of-a-rose
23. what-lessons-can-science-learn-from-tragedies-like-these
24. the-specific-traits-of-a-scientific-mind
25. science-and-the-paranormal
26. are-these-inventions-and-discoveries-really-accidental-and-intuitive like the journalists say?
27. how-the-brain-of-a-polymath-copes-with-all-the-things-it-does
28. how-to-make-scientific-research-in-india-a-success-story
29. getting-rid-of-plastic-the-natural-way
30. why-some-interesting-things-happen-in-nature
31. real-life-stories-that-proves-how-science-helps-you
32. Science and trust series:
a. how-to-trust-science-stories-a-guide-for-common-man
b. trust-in-science-what-makes-people-waver
c. standing-up-for-science-showing-reasons-why-science-should-be-trusted
You will find the entire list of discussions here: http://kkartlab.in/group/some-science/forum
( Please go through the comments section below to find scientific research reports posted on a daily basis and watch videos based on science)
Get interactive...
Please contact us if you want us to add any information or scientific explanation on any topic that interests you. We will try our level best to give you the right information.
Our mail ID: kkartlabin@gmail.com
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Sunday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: How are scientists using menstruation blood for osteoarthritis treatment?Krishna: Millions suffer from osteoarthritis—a progressive, degenerative joint disorder resulting in cartilage damage, loss of joint function, and chronic pain.Treatments…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Sunday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: Can illness affect blood sugar levels?Krishna: Yes!Before getting into specific details, first let us understand what makes the blood sugar rise and fall What makes it rise?(1)Too much food, such as a meal or snack with more carbohydrates than…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Sunday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: How does regular physical activity support a normal immune function?Q: What is the relationship between exercise and immunity? Krishna:…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Friday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Among 38 viral TikTok videos on Korean skincare and “glass skin,” nearly 95% contained potentially misleading claims, and safety guidance was largely absent. All were rated unreliable or less reliable. Among 94 patients with skin problems after…Continue
Comment
A New Cause of High Blood Pressure?
A study has found evidence that a specific brain region could be contributing to some cases of high blood pressure.
And importantly, there may also be a way to reverse it.
According to the 2025 study, carried out by a team from the University of São Paulo in Brazil and the University of Auckland in New Zealand, the lateral parafacial (pFL) brain region can trigger biological changes that raise blood pressure.
The pFL is linked to breathing control – specifically those forceful and deliberate exhalations that happen during exercise or when we cough or laugh.
In tests carried out on rats, the researchers found it can also do something else: tighten up blood vessels.
That combination of breath control and blood vessel signaling could be driving hypertension in some cases, the researchers say.
It might explain why so many people (around 40 percent by some estimates) still have uncontrolled blood pressure despite taking anti-hypertensive medications.
The study suggests that pFL neurons may link changes in breathing rhythms – which wouldn't necessarily be noticeable – to increased activity in the sympathetic nervous system (our 'fight-or-flight' response) that helps control blood pressure, fitting with previous research that has linked hypertension to the brain and nervous system.
"Given that around 50 percent of patients with hypertension have a neurogenic component, the challenge is to understand mechanisms generating sympatho-excitation in hypertension," write the researchers in their published paper.
"Such a revelation would provide much-needed clinical orientation for new therapeutic strategies."
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.125.326674
Heat-trapping gas once frozen in Arctic ground is slowly leaking and warming the planet
Arctic permafrost thaw releases methane and carbon dioxide from decomposing organic matter, amplifying global warming. These emissions are projected to add about 0.25°C of warming by 2100, beyond fossil-fuel-driven warming. Thaw also destabilizes ground, threatening buildings, roads and pipelines.
----
How can the same El Niño cause drought in one part of the world and floods in another?
El Niño weakens trade winds, shifting warm water and rainfall eastward and favouring wetter conditions in the eastern Pacific and drought in the western Pacific. Changes in atmospheric heating, winds and other oceans extend these effects globally. El Niño shifts weather probabilities, but local systems can still produce opposing extremes.
High blood pressure can accelerate osteoarthritis joint damage via a newly identified hormone pathway
For millions of people, osteoarthritis slowly breaks down the joints, bringing pain, swelling and stiffness that make free movement harder with time. It is largely a condition of age, with 73% of those living with it older than 55. For years, the wear and tear that comes with aging and physical trauma was considered a major driver of the disease. A recent study published in Science, however, points to a metabolic disease that is also highly common among this demographic as a contributing factor in osteoarthritis progression.
A look at national health data from 36,820 Korean adults ages 45 and older revealed that high blood pressure was linked to osteoarthritis, with stronger associations in more severely damaged knees.
In mouse models, the researchers saw that hypertension actively drives joint breakdown in aging or injured joints. The damaging mechanism was coordinated by a brain hormone and a hormone receptor found in joints. These two components created conditions that ramped up destructive enzymes that break down cartilage. At the same time, they suppressed the production of cartilage components, such as collagen and aggrecan, that joints need to repair themselves.
To test cause and effect in living organisms, the team performed surgery on male mice to simulate mechanical joint wear and tear. They cut microscopic knee sections and stained them with a dye to measure changes in knee and bone structures.
Gene profiling experiments showed that high blood pressure increases blood levels of a brain hormone called arginine vasopressin (AVP), which travels through the bloodstream and leaks into the joint fluid. Healthy joint cartilage has little to no place for this hormone to bind, but mechanical injury or aging changes that.
Damaged cartilage starts producing a receptor called AVPR1A, which binds the hormone AVP and switches on a gene regulator called NR4A3. This sets off a damaging chain reaction. Cells begin producing excessive amounts of enzymes that break down cartilage while simultaneously reducing the proteins needed to build and maintain it.
The researchers also compared damaged and healthy knee cartilage and joint fluid collected during human total knee replacement surgeries. The damaged human cartilage had higher levels of AVPR1A receptors and a biomarker of the hormone vasopressin, which is responsible for increased blood pressure.
They also found that removing the AVPR1A gene or injecting a vasopressin receptor antagonist called relcovaptan directly into the knee joint prevented high blood pressure from accelerating cartilage loss. However, treating mice with standard blood pressure medication did not improve the condition of the cartilage.
This study uncovers the biological mechanisms linking hypertension to accelerated osteoarthritis progression.
Su-Jin Kim et al, Hypertension fuels osteoarthritis through neuroendocrine signaling, Science (2026). DOI: 10.1126/science.aed8207
Chunyi Wen et al, Osteoarthritis as a vascular disease, Science (2026). DOI: 10.1126/science.ael3784
When unsure of the rule, people remembered the 'irrelevant' feature better. The value of the ignored feature pushed choices in a consistent direction.
Cheng Xue et al, Feature interference underlies a neuronal basis for the behavioral cost of task uncertainty, Nature Neuroscience (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41593-026-02430-w.
Part 2
Irrelevant visual details interfere with decisions under uncertainty, brain research shows
Cognitive flexibility, the ability to adjust one's way of thinking or behavior as a situation changes, is known to gradually decline with age or due to some conditions, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia and substance use disorders. One aspect of cognitive flexibility is being able to switch between different tasks without becoming distracted and losing focus.
Researchers recently carried out a study involving both people and monkeys to understand how suddenly changing the rules of a task influences how the brain processes available information. Their findings, presented in a paper published in Nature Neuroscience, suggest that uncertainty increases the likelihood that irrelevant visual features will interfere with decision-making.
Even healthy young people feel stretched when they juggle several tasks, and psychology research shows that we become slower and more error-prone right after a switch.
So researchers wanted to find a possible neuronal explanation for why switching between different tasks can reduce performance. Specifically, they wished to understand what brain changes are associated with mistakes during basic perceptual judgments when people and nonhuman primates are unsure about what task they should be performing.
To shed light on these neural changes, the researchers conducted experiments involving humans and monkeys. Both species were shown images as they performed one of two visual tasks.
The tasks required participants to focus on one feature of an image while ignoring another. The rule governing which visual feature mattered changed during the experiment, requiring participants to determine what task to perform at different times.
Their performance on the task they chose to do indeed became worse.
To find out why the brain makes such mistakes, they first taught a model to err in the same way. Instead of training an artificial neural network to perform the task well, they trained it to reproduce the animals' actual choices, mistakes included. The network then became a specimen they could take apart to generate precise hypotheses.
After training a machine learning model to reproduce the choices made by monkeys during the experiment, the researchers trained a second model to make correct choices on the same tasks. This allowed them to compare the performance of the two.
Analyzing the model showed that mistakes during task switching are likely driven by the interference of the task-irrelevant information with task-relevant information.
Then they tested the model's predictions with new behavioral experiments in humans, analyses of the neuronal recordings while the animals performed the task, and small artificial perturbations of the neuronal activities in the animals' visual cortex.
The team's findings suggest that the additional mistakes made by both humans and monkeys under uncertainty are not random. Instead, the mistakes appeared to follow a specific pattern, which the team dubbed "feature interference".
When we are unsure which rule applies, the brain holds on to information it should be ignoring.
The brain's representations of different features are not perfectly separate; they sit at an angle to one another. The lingering irrelevant information therefore leaks into the relevant information and biases decisions in a predictable direction.
The results gathered indicate that, under uncertainty, mistakes may not come from a shortage of mental resources. Instead, mistakes could arise, at least in part, when mental representations of different visual features interfere with one another.
Part 1
The 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to scientists Karl Deisseroth, Georg Nagel and Peter Hegemann for their discoveries underpinning the field of optogenetics, the ability to control genetically modified cells with light.
Optogenetics makes it possible to switch on, or off, the activity of individual nerve cells in a living brain. This method is now being used in laboratories around the world to reveal the brain’s mysteries.
This shows that extraordinary creativity and ability to bridge disciplines have given scientists powerful new tools to unravel the complexities of the human brain, bringing answers to questions once beyond reach and hope to patients and families worldwide.
The hope that the knowledge generated by using optogenetics will lead to new medical treatments has begun to come to fruition. The method has provided greater understanding of the distinguishing features of psychiatric and neurological disorders such as depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.
Researchers have also taken the first steps towards using optogenetics as a medical treatment. In ongoing clinical trials they attempt to restore vision in people who have become blind due to retinitis pigmentosa, a disease that destroys the eye’s rods and cones. When they inserted a channelrhodopsin-like protein in the retina of a blind person, the person regained some vision. Using special glasses emitting light, the person was able to discern and grasp objects on a table.
There are also hopes that optogenetics could improve cochlea implants. Currently, these implants stimulate the auditory nerve using electricity. If it were instead possible to use optogenetics, the implant may be able to activate the auditory nerve with greater precision.
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2026/popular-information/
Nine Patients Received a Personalized Kidney Cancer Vaccine. None Had a Recurrence.
How do you teach the immune system to recognize a cancer cell?
Researchers are taking clues from the tumor itself, selecting unusual protein fragments and putting them into a vaccine. The aim is to help the body recognize that particular patient's cancer.
In a small kidney cancer trial, this approach produced encouraging results. Nine people received an experimental vaccine tailored to their own tumors.
None experienced a recurrence during a median follow-up of roughly three years and four months after surgery.
All nine developed immune responses to the vaccine. In seven, vaccine-reactive T cells could also recognize the patient's own tumour. T cells are immune cells that help identify threats and coordinate or carry out an attack.
But these findings do not yet prove that vaccination prevented the cancer from returning.
With the limited number of patients, we must be cautious with further interpretation.
Virus nabbed gene from ancient people
The poxvirus molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV) contains two copies of an ancient human gene, which could be helping it to infect people. The gene, BC200, was originally a ‘jumping gene’ — a sequence that could move around in the genome — but has since lost its ability to relocate. Researchers found that the virus acquired BC200 around 150,000 years ago, which suggests that the gene was still mobile relatively recently in human evolutionary history. MCV might use BC200 to keep a host cell’s protein factories active so it can replicate, the team says.
No single approach works for everyone, but several options have evidence behind them.
During perimenopause and after menopause, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends considering vaginal estrogen for recurrent UTIs. NICE produces health and care guidance for England and recommends this approach when behavioral and personal hygiene measures have not been effective or are unsuitable. It has some of the strongest evidence among nonantibiotic approaches.
Drinking more water can help people who do not normally drink much. In a trial of 140 premenopausal women who drank less than 1.5 liters (51 fluid ounces) of fluid a day, those asked to add another 1.5 liters (51 fluid ounces) of water averaged 1.7 bladder infections over a year, compared with 3.2 among those who continued their usual intake.
Cranberry products may reduce recurrence for some women, although the evidence varies between studies and formulations. Current guidance from the European Association of Urology advises patients that the evidence remains contradictory and generally low quality.
D-mannose, a type of sugar sold as a dietary supplement, is thought to help prevent UTIs by making it harder for some E. coli bacteria to stick to the bladder lining. It looked promising in smaller studies but failed to prevent infections in a much larger U.K. randomized trial involving 598 women.
For people with recurrent infections, NICE says doctors can consider preventive treatment after any current infection has been treated. Options can include methenamine hippurate, a nonantibiotic urinary antiseptic, or preventive antibiotics. The choice depends on factors including how frequent and severe the infections are, previous urine test results, previous antibiotic use and whether measures such as vaginal estrogen or a single antibiotic dose after an identifiable trigger have helped.
Long-term antibiotic use also needs to be weighed against side effects and antimicrobial resistance, which the World Health Organization describes as a growing threat to global health.
The mini-bladder findings recast a UTI as a disease shaped by interactions between bacteria, bladder tissue, the immune system and the chemical and physical conditions inside the bladder.
Bladder-model study also investigated whether bacteria-killing viruses called bacteriophages, or phages, could help target bacteria persisting in bladder tissue. Phages reduced clusters of bacteria inside bladder cells, but adding them to nitrofurantoin did not consistently clear more bacteria from the bladder tissue than the antibiotic alone.
For someone whose infection keeps coming back, one possible explanation is that a small population of bacteria survived the original treatment and was able to start growing again.
Part 2
**
Lab‑grown 'mini‑bladder' helps explain why urinary tract infections keep coming back
UTIs affect more than 400 million people worldwide each year, according to a global analysis of UTI incidence. More than half of adult women will have at least one in their lifetime, and studies suggest around a quarter experience another within six months.
Antibiotics aren't simply failing. New research using a lab-grown human "mini-bladder" suggests part of the answer may lie inside the bladder wall itself.
Most UTIs are caused by a type of Escherichia coli that normally lives harmlessly in the gut. Problems start when bacteria travel up the urethra into the bladder.
A repeat infection can happen in two ways. New bacteria from the gut can make the same journey again, and many recurrences are reinfections. But sometimes bacteria from the original infection appear to survive treatment and later reemerge.
In 3D human bladder models, E. coli survived fosfomycin in deeper tissue in a cell-wall-deficient form and regrew after treatment ended. Concentrated urine weakened tissue barriers, while nitrofurantoin failed to eradicate tissue-associated bacteria in a separate model. These laboratory findings support a possible mechanism of UTI recurrence but do not establish its clinical frequency.
Why women are hit hardest
Anatomy is a major reason women tend to suffer more than men from UTIs. A woman's urethra is much shorter than a man's, so bacteria have a shorter distance to travel before reaching the bladder. The urethral opening is also close to the anus, where gut bacteria live.
Sexual activity and the use of spermicides are also established risk factors for recurrent infection in premenopausal women.
Risk rises again around and after menopause. Falling estrogen changes the tissues of the vagina and urinary tract and is associated with a reduction in protective Lactobacillus bacteria, creating conditions in which UTI-causing bacteria can become more established.
Part 1
© 2026 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Science Simplified! to add comments!