Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
JAI VIGNAN
All about Science - to remove misconceptions and encourage scientific temper
Communicating science to the common people
'To make them see the world differently through the beautiful lense of science'
Members: 22
Latest Activity: 1 hour ago
WE LOVE SCIENCE HERE BECAUSE IT IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING
THIS IS A WAR ZONE WHERE SCIENCE FIGHTS WITH NONSENSE AND WINS
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
"Being a scientist is a state of mind, not a profession!"
"Science, when it's done right, can yield amazing things".
The Reach of Scientific Research From Labs to Laymen
The aim of science is not only to open a door to infinite knowledge and wisdom but to set a limit to infinite error.
"Knowledge is a Superpower but the irony is you cannot get enough of it with ever increasing data base unless you try to keep up with it constantly and in the right way!" The best education comes from learning from people who know what they are exactly talking about.
Science is this glorious adventure into the unknown, the opportunity to discover things that nobody knew before. And that’s just an experience that’s not to be missed. But it’s also a motivated effort to try to help humankind. And maybe that’s just by increasing human knowledge—because that’s a way to make us a nobler species.
If you are scientifically literate the world looks very different to you.
We do science and science communication not because they are easy but because they are difficult!
“Science is not a subject you studied in school. It’s life. We 're brought into existence by it!"
“A society that loses science loses the future.”
Links to some important articles :
1. Interactive science series...
a. how-to-do-research-and-write-research-papers-part 13
b. Some Qs people asked me on science and my replies to them...
Part 6, part-10, part-11, part-12, part 14 , part- 8,
part- 1, part-2, part-4, part-5, part-16, part-17, part-18 , part-19 , part-20
part-21 , part-22, part-23, part-24, part-25, part-26, part-27 , part-28
part-29, part-30, part-31, part-32, part-33, part-34, part-35, part-36, part-37,
part-38, part-40, part-41, part-42, part-43, part-44, part-45, part-46, part-47
Part 48, part49, Critical thinking -part 50 , part -51, part-52, part-53
part-54, part-55, part-57, part-58, part-59, part-60, part-61, part-62, part-63
part 64, part-65, part-66, part-67, part-68, part 69, part-70 part-71, part-73 ...
.......306
BP variations during pregnancy part-72
who is responsible for the gender of their children - a man or a woman -part-56
c. some-questions-people-asked-me-on-science-based-on-my-art-and-poems -part-7
d. science-s-rules-are-unyielding-they-will-not-be-bent-for-anybody-part-3-
e. debate-between-scientists-and-people-who-practice-and-propagate-pseudo-science - part -9
f. pseudoscience
g. How Science is demolishing patriarchal ideas - part-39
2. in-defence-of-mangalyaan-why-even-developing-countries-like-india need space research programmes
3. Science communication series:
a. science-communication - part 1
b. how-scientists-should-communicate-with-laymen - part 2
c. main-challenges-of-science-communication-and-how-to-overcome-them - part 3
d. the-importance-of-science-communication-through-art- part 4
e. why-science-communication-is-getting worse - part 5
f. why-science-journalism-is-not-taken-seriously-in-this-part-of-the-world - part 6
g. blogs-the-best-bet-to-communicate-science-by-scientists- part 7
h. why-it-is-difficult-for-scientists-to-debate-controversial-issues - part 8
i. science-writers-and-communicators-where-are-you - part 9
j. shooting-the-messengers-for-a-different-reason-for-conveying-the- part 10
k. why-is-science-journalism-different-from-other-forms-of-journalism - part 11
l. golden-rules-of-science-communication- Part 12
m. science-writers-should-develop-a-broader-view-to-put-things-in-th - part 13
n. an-informed-patient-is-the-most-cooperative-one -part 14
o. the-risks-scientists-will-have-to-face-while-communicating-science - part 15
p. the-most-difficult-part-of-science-communication - part 16
q. clarity-on-who-you-are-writing-for-is-important-before-sitting-to write a science story - part 17
r. science-communicators-get-thick-skinned-to-communicate-science-without-any-bias - part 18
s. is-post-truth-another-name-for-science-communication-failure?
t. why-is-it-difficult-for-scientists-to-have-high-eqs
u. art-and-literature-as-effective-aids-in-science-communication-and teaching
v.* some-qs-people-asked-me-on-science communication-and-my-replies-to-them
** qs-people-asked-me-on-science-and-my-replies-to-them-part-173
w. why-motivated-perception-influences-your-understanding-of-science
x. science-communication-in-uncertain-times
y. sci-com: why-keep-a-dog-and-bark-yourself
z. How to deal with sci com dilemmas?
A+. sci-com-what-makes-a-story-news-worthy-in-science
B+. is-a-perfect-language-important-in-writing-science-stories
C+. sci-com-how-much-entertainment-is-too-much-while-communicating-sc
D+. sci-com-why-can-t-everybody-understand-science-in-the-same-way
E+. how-to-successfully-negotiate-the-science-communication-maze
4. Health related topics:
a. why-antibiotic-resistance-is-increasing-and-how-scientists-are-tr
b. what-might-happen-when-you-take-lots-of-medicines
c. know-your-cesarean-facts-ladies
d. right-facts-about-menstruation
e. answer-to-the-question-why-on-big-c
f. how-scientists-are-identifying-new-preventive-measures-and-cures-
g. what-if-little-creatures-high-jack-your-brain-and-try-to-control-
h. who-knows-better?
k. can-rust-from-old-drinking-water-pipes-cause-health-problems
l. pvc-and-cpvc-pipes-should-not-be-used-for-drinking-water-supply
m. melioidosis
o. desensitization-and-transplant-success-story
p. do-you-think-the-medicines-you-are-taking-are-perfectly-alright-then revisit your position!
q. swine-flu-the-difficlulties-we-still-face-while-tackling-the-outb
r. dump-this-useless-information-into-a-garbage-bin-if-you-really-care about evidence based medicine
s. don-t-ignore-these-head-injuries
u. allergic- agony-caused-by-caterpillars-and-moths
General science:
a.why-do-water-bodies-suddenly-change-colour
b. don-t-knock-down-your-own-life-line
c. the-most-menacing-animal-in-the-world
d. how-exo-planets-are-detected
e. the-importance-of-earth-s-magnetic-field
f. saving-tigers-from-extinction-is-still-a-travail
g. the-importance-of-snakes-in-our-eco-systems
h. understanding-reverse-osmosis
i. the-importance-of-microbiomes
j. crispr-cas9-gene-editing-technique-a-boon-to-fixing-defective-gen
k. biomimicry-a-solution-to-some-of-our-problems
5. the-dilemmas-scientists-face
6. why-we-get-contradictory-reports-in-science
7. be-alert-pseudo-science-and-anti-science-are-on-prowl
8. science-will-answer-your-questions-and-solve-your-problems
9. how-science-debunks-baseless-beliefs
10. climate-science-and-its-relevance
11. the-road-to-a-healthy-life
12. relative-truth-about-gm-crops-and-foods
13. intuition-based-work-is-bad-science
14. how-science-explains-near-death-experiences
15. just-studies-are-different-from-thorough-scientific-research
16. lab-scientists-versus-internet-scientists
17. can-you-challenge-science?
18. the-myth-of-ritual-working
19.science-and-superstitions-how-rational-thinking-can-make-you-work-better
20. comets-are-not-harmful-or-bad-omens-so-enjoy-the-clestial-shows
21. explanation-of-mysterious-lights-during-earthquakes
22. science-can-tell-what-constitutes-the-beauty-of-a-rose
23. what-lessons-can-science-learn-from-tragedies-like-these
24. the-specific-traits-of-a-scientific-mind
25. science-and-the-paranormal
26. are-these-inventions-and-discoveries-really-accidental-and-intuitive like the journalists say?
27. how-the-brain-of-a-polymath-copes-with-all-the-things-it-does
28. how-to-make-scientific-research-in-india-a-success-story
29. getting-rid-of-plastic-the-natural-way
30. why-some-interesting-things-happen-in-nature
31. real-life-stories-that-proves-how-science-helps-you
32. Science and trust series:
a. how-to-trust-science-stories-a-guide-for-common-man
b. trust-in-science-what-makes-people-waver
c. standing-up-for-science-showing-reasons-why-science-should-be-trusted
You will find the entire list of discussions here: http://kkartlab.in/group/some-science/forum
( Please go through the comments section below to find scientific research reports posted on a daily basis and watch videos based on science)
Get interactive...
Please contact us if you want us to add any information or scientific explanation on any topic that interests you. We will try our level best to give you the right information.
Our mail ID: kkartlabin@gmail.com
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa 3 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Vaccines protect most people from serious illness, but the strength of that protection can vary considerably from one person to another. A new study helps us understand why.Before a vaccine ever enters the body, the immune system may already hold…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa 3 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Too much RNA can starve cells of energy, study findsA new study by researchers has uncovered a previously unknown consequence of viral infection: Too much RNA inside a cell can disrupt its ability to produce energy.Published in the journal…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa yesterday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: I work a lot at home. Due to this I get tired and lack the energy to exercise. But my doctor insists on regular exercises. Why isn't physical hard work an exercise?Krishna: Several women complain about it. Yes, any physical activity is…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Wednesday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Restoring a missing slice of sunshine to indoor light may help prevent myopiaMyopia, or nearsightedness, develops when the eye grows too long from front to back. This prevents images from focusing directly on the retina in the back of the eye,…Continue
Comment
Cabin crew at greater risk of radiation‑based cancer than nuclear technologists, new study suggests
Analysis of 12.7 million death records linked pilots and cabin crew with the highest proportions of deaths from selected radiation-associated cancers (6.7% and 6.9%). Repeated cosmic-radiation exposure at flight altitude may contribute, but individual flight histories and doses were unavailable, so causation cannot be established.
Staying hydrated and preventing complications
There isn't a one-size-fits-all recommendation for how much water you need. For most healthy people, thirst is a reliable guide. If you feel thirsty, drink something. If you know you'll be spending time outdoors in the heat or exercising for an extended period, increase your fluid intake beforehand.
Dehydration isn't always easy to recognize, so it helps to look for other signs. Dry mouth, dry skin, dark urine, foamy urine or a burning sensation when you urinate may all indicate you need more fluids. One of the simplest ways to monitor your hydration is to pay attention to the color of your urine. Pale or clear urine generally suggests you're well hydrated, while darker urine may be a sign that you need more fluids.
Water is an excellent first choice for staying hydrated, but if you're truly dehydrated, water alone may not always be enough. Your blood contains electrolytes such as sodium, potassium and magnesium. Drinking water along with consuming something salty may help replace both fluids and electrolytes. People participating in prolonged exercise or endurance activities also may benefit from electrolyte-containing sports drinks.
Alcohol is a major contributor to dehydration because it changes how the brain and kidneys regulate fluids and can increase fluid loss. Highly caffeinated drinks also can contribute to dehydration. If you're trying to rehydrate, choose water or electrolyte-containing drinks instead of sugary drinks or soda.
The best way to prevent dehydration is to stay ahead of it. Make drinking fluids a regular part of your day. Drinking smaller amounts throughout the day is often more effective than consuming a large amount all at once.
If you'll be gardening, exercising or working outdoors in hot, humid weather, plan ahead, stay aware of how you're feeling and adjust your activities if needed."
Most importantly, know your personal risk. If you're older, have heart disease or take medications that affect your body's fluid balance, you may need to pay especially close attention to staying hydrated. Planning ahead, listening to your body and recognizing the signs of dehydration can help protect your heart and your overall health.
Part 2
Dehydration can cause more than thirst: Expert explains how it can affect the heart
Dehydration reduces circulating blood volume, increasing cardiac workload and triggering faster heart rate and blood-vessel constriction. Severe dehydration can impair organ blood flow, causing dizziness, palpitations, chest discomfort, fainting, or heatstroke. Older adults, children, people with heart disease, and those using fluid-altering medications are at increased risk.
Think of the heart as a pump. For it to work properly, enough blood needs to return to it with every heartbeat.
When you become dehydrated, the amount of fluid circulating in your bloodstream decreases. That means less blood returns to the heart, so it has to work harder to keep blood moving throughout your body."
Your body has several built-in ways to respond to dehydration. Blood vessels narrow to help maintain blood pressure, and your heart beats faster to keep blood moving. If dehydration becomes more severe, those usual responses can begin to fail. As a result, organs such as the brain, kidneys, liver and digestive system may not receive enough blood to function properly.
As dehydration worsens, symptoms can include:
Racing heartbeat or palpitations
Fatigue
Lightheadedness
Dizziness
Vision changes
Shortness of breath
Chest discomfort
If dehydration becomes severe, it can lead to heatstroke or fainting. These are medical emergencies and should be evaluated by a health care professional immediately.
Anyone can become dehydrated, but some people are at greater risk, including:
Older adults
Children
Athletes
Outdoor workers
People with heart disease
People taking certain medications, such as diuretics or GLP-1 receptor agonists
"People with heart failure or other forms of heart disease should be especially careful.
Part 1
Gray and white matter jointly shape cognitive aging, new evidence shows
Researchers have found that two distinct types of brain tissue work together to support cognition in older adults and that the health of the brain's short-range wiring may help soften the cognitive effects of gray matter loss.
The study, published in Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, analyzed brain scans and cognitive assessments from 459 community-dwelling adults 60 and older across India.
It is among the first studies to examine the brain's superficial white matter in a community-based population from a low- and middle-income country.
Superficial white matter is a thin layer of nerve fibers immediately beneath the brain's outer gray matter. These short, curved fibers act like local roads, carrying signals between nearby areas of the cerebral cortex. Gray matter, by comparison, contains many of the brain cells that process information.
Gray matter and superficial white matter are physically close and may play different roles: gray matter processes information, while superficial white matter helps nearby brain regions communicate.
These new findings suggest that cognitive health depends not only on how much gray matter is preserved, but also on the condition of the wiring that connects it.
The researchers used an advanced form of diffusion MRI, which measures how water moves through brain tissue, to assess microscopic features of superficial white matter. They focused on measures that reflect neurite density, the small projections that allow nerve cells to send and receive signals, and the amount of freely moving water around them. Lower neurite density or more free water can indicate tissue disruption associated with processes such as loss of myelin, inflammation or swelling.
Participants also completed tests of language, memory, executive function and visuospatial ability. The team found that healthier superficial white matter was most consistently associated with stronger language skills. The clearest links appeared in frontotemporal areas involved in recognizing words, speaking fluently and holding language information in mind.
Gray matter atrophy measures remained the strongest overall predictors of cognition. However, the relationship between gray matter and cognitive performance depended in part on superficial white matter: When this local wiring showed poorer integrity, gray matter loss was more strongly tied to worse language performance and cognitive impairment. When superficial white matter was healthier, those associations were weaker.
The findings point to superficial white matter as a possible source of resilience.
Two people with a similar degree of gray matter loss may not experience the same cognitive effects if the local connections surrounding that gray matter differ in health. Following participants over time will be essential to test whether preserving these connections can help maintain cognition.
Yingxu Liu et al, Superficial white matter and gray matter jointly support cognition among older adults in India, Alzheimer's & Dementia (2026). DOI: 10.1002/alz.71697
The findings may also have implications beyond viral infections.
Researchers have observed RNA accumulation in a variety of conditions—including some cancers, neurodegenerative diseases and age-related disorders—suggesting that mitochondrial damage may be one way excess RNA contributes to those conditions.
Perturbation of RNA homeostasis impairs mitochondrial respiration during poxvirus infection through excess RNA accumulation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2026). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.26051941
Part 2
Too much RNA can starve cells of energy, study finds
Why do you feel very weak after viral infections?
A new study by researchers has uncovered a previously unknown consequence of viral infection: Too much RNA inside a cell can disrupt its ability to produce energy.
Published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the study found that when excess RNA builds up inside cells during poxvirus infection, it can impair mitochondria—the structures responsible for generating most of a cell's energy—reducing the cell's ability to function normally.
The discovery could have broad implications for understanding viral infections, age-related diseases and RNA-based therapeutics, including mRNA vaccines, because excess RNA can accumulate in each of these conditions.
Scientists have long known that RNA degradation helps control protein production and remove defective RNA. This new study reveals another important role: It helps cells maintain the energy they need to function properly.
The findings suggest that RNA degradation serves a broader purpose than scientists once realized. In addition to controlling protein production, supporting RNA quality control and helping cells regulate immune responses, it also helps protect the cell's ability to generate energy.
RNA exists in many forms. Messenger RNA (mRNA) carries the genetic instructions cells use to make proteins, which help cells perform their normal functions. Another form, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), is commonly produced during viral infections and alerts the immune system that something is wrong.
During viral infection, viruses can produce large amounts of RNA. If cells cannot break down the excess RNA quickly enough, the buildup can damage mitochondria and reduce the cell's ability to generate energy.
While scientists already knew that excess dsRNA can trigger immune responses and that cells need to control dsRNA levels, the effects of mRNA came as a surprise.
mRNA is a normal component of our cells, but it seems like with many good things, if we get too much, that can become a problem for the cell. When too much RNA builds up, including mRNA, it can damage the mitochondria and interfere with the cell's ability to produce energy.
Viruses rely entirely on host cells for energy and protein production, but producing too much viral RNA can overwhelm the very cells viruses depend on to survive.
poxviruses—the family of viruses that includes smallpox and mpox—appear to use RNA cleanup systems to degrade RNAs and keep infected cells functioning long enough for the virus to continue replicating.
If the cell is not healthy, the virus would not replicate well. The virus needs to keep RNA levels balanced inside the cell.
The team also found that mitochondrial impairment occurred before major immune responses were activated and did not depend on the immune system's usual response to infection, further supporting the idea that RNA itself contributes to the damage.
Researchers think the negatively charged RNA may accumulate around mitochondria and disrupt the electrical balance needed for energy production, although how it happens is unknown.
Part 1
To test whether that antibody fingerprint could reveal vaccine readiness, the researchers analyzed antibody responses to 185 antigens. These included SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, other common viruses and bacteria, and targets associated with autoimmune diseases.
The study included 8,687 samples from 4,089 participants, spanning healthy volunteers and people with conditions or treatments linked to immune suppression, such as HIV, multiple myeloma, solid organ malignancy, autoimmune disease, inflammatory bowel disease and solid organ transplantation.
The researchers found that several immunosuppressed groups were more likely to have blunted responses to COVID-19 vaccination. But those categories were imperfect predictors. Some immunosuppressed participants mounted strong responses, while about 5% to 6% of healthy participants had weak responses.
The study found that higher levels of certain preexisting antibodies, including antibodies to common microbes such as Staphylococcus aureus, RSV and human respirovirus 3, were associated with stronger COVID-19 vaccine responses.
The researchers describe these as "sentinel" antibodies because they may indicate a person's baseline immune readiness. They are not necessarily fighting the vaccine target directly. Instead, they may reflect how responsive the antibody-producing arm of the immune system is likely to be.
The researchers then asked whether the full antibody fingerprint, not just a few individual markers, could help identify people likely to have weak vaccine responses. Their deep-learning model analyzed patterns across the antibody panel, combining many measurements into a broader immune profile.
The study highlights a key strength of AI in health research: its ability to find subtle, predictive patterns in millions of biological data points that might otherwise remain hidden. The approach suggests that vaccine readiness may be better understood by looking at the immune system as a whole, rather than focusing only on a single disease or a single antibody.
The work also highlights the value of newer technologies that can measure large numbers of antibody responses at once. Instead of asking whether someone has antibodies to one pathogen, the method can scan a wider immune landscape, capturing patterns formed by many previous encounters with viruses, bacteria and other immune targets.
Sentinel antibody profiling could help guide vaccine testing, vaccine development and clinical care for people at risk of weak immune responses.
The approach might eventually help doctors identify patients who need additional vaccine doses, closer follow-up or alternative protective measures. It could also help researchers better understand why some people respond well to vaccination while others do not.
Pre-vaccine sentinel antibodies predict blunted vaccine responses, Cell Press Blue (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.cpblue.2026.100088. www.cell.com/cell-press-blue/f … 3051-3839(26)00086-1
Part 2
Why immune responses to vaccines vary from person to person
Vaccines protect most people from serious illness, but the strength of that protection can vary considerably from one person to another. A new study helps us understand why.
Before a vaccine ever enters the body, the immune system may already hold clues to how strongly it will respond. In blood samples from more than 4,000 people, researchers measured antibodies against 185 antigens—targets recognized by the immune system, including those from common viruses and bacteria as well as targets associated with autoimmune diseases.
They then used artificial intelligence to analyze patterns in samples collected before and after COVID-19 vaccination, identifying antibody signatures that helped distinguish strong vaccine responders from weak ones.
The research opens a possible path toward more personalized vaccination strategies.
What this study found is that certain biomarkers, when analyzed with AI, can predict who is likely to respond well to a vaccine, even before they receive it. This suggests that some people may be more immune-ready than others.
Usually, scientists evaluate vaccine response after the shot by measuring whether the immune system produces antibodies against the target. Here, the researchers asked a different question: Could patterns already present in the blood predict the response before vaccination?
Age, sex, genetics, prior illnesses and underlying health conditions have all been linked to how strongly people respond to vaccines. People with immune-compromising conditions are often at higher risk of weaker responses. But even within these groups, outcomes can differ sharply.
The new approach is one of the first to use a broad, pre-vaccine antibody "fingerprint" to assess immune readiness. Unlike some prediction methods that rely on genetic analyses, this strategy uses antibody patterns in blood, which may be easier to adapt for clinical use.
Part 1
Simple mouth rinse may help detect stomach and colorectal cancer signals
It's widely understood that the microbiome—especially microbes found in the mouth and the gut—can have a profound effect on health. In a study published in the journal Cell Host & Microbe on Aug. 20, researchers report that by analyzing the makeup of oral microbes, they may be able to detect signals associated with gastric (stomach) and colorectal cancer. These findings could lead to the development of new, less invasive screening tests for gastrointestinal cancers.
Many species of microbes associated with the mouth are also present in the gut and may flourish there. These observations made the researchers
wonder whether oral microbes reach and persist in the gastrointestinal tract differently in people with cancer.
To conduct the study, the researchers recruited 507 volunteers to donate both oral and fecal samples, using a highly standardized collection process. The cohort included 129 healthy individuals; 215 people with metabolic disorders such as metabolic syndrome, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes; 77 people with gastric cancer; and 86 people with colorectal cancer. For the volunteers with cancer, samples were collected before the start of any treatment.
The team used gene sequencing to create what they called a mouth-to-feces (MF) index, which measures the extent to which identical microbial sequence variants are found in oral and fecal samples from the same person. They then evaluated how well the MF index could distinguish cancer patients from healthy individuals. The analysis revealed distinct signatures in people with gastric or colorectal cancer.
The findings were more nuanced than a simple cancer-versus-healthy comparison. The MF index was significantly elevated in patients with gastric or colorectal cancer but not in people with metabolic disorders. After accounting for alcohol consumption, regular exercise and BMI, the association remained robust for both gastric and colorectal cancers.
The team also compared the signatures found in the cancer patients with results from fecal occult blood tests, a standard colorectal cancer screening tool that analyzes stool samples. They found higher sensitivity with the oral samples, which were collected by a simple mouth rinse.
"It was notable that cancer-related information could be recovered from oral samples alone," say the researchers. Although only a small fraction of oral bacterial variants were also detected in the gut, models built using only these oral features could distinguish patients with cancer from healthy individuals across several independent cohorts.
In the longer term, combining microbial patterns with genetics, lifestyle and clinical outcomes may help explain why oral microbes persist more readily in some people than in others and may improve individualized risk prediction.
Mouth-to-gut microbial transmission signatures enable robust, non-invasive diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers, Cell Host & Microbe (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2026.07.007. www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe … 1931-3128(26)00308-2
Dark energy and quantum gravity may be deeply intertwined
For close to a century, physicists have pursued a way to unite gravity with quantum mechanics. Known as quantum gravity, this goal has remained frustratingly out of reach so far. Similarly elusive is the force of dark energy, which is believed to be driving the universe's accelerating expansion.
But through new research published in Physical Review D, physicists have proposed a new explanation suggesting that these two phenomena might not be separate at all. Instead, dark energy could be a natural side effect of quantum gravity, acting on the geometry of space itself.
Gravity and quantum mechanics shape the universe on vastly different scales: While quantum mechanics concerns the realm of subatomic particles, gravity shapes structures as large as galactic clusters and cosmic filaments.
Individually, both of these theories have been tested to extraordinary precision through decades of painstaking experiments. However, the extreme conditions where both should apply at once, such as inside a black hole, have remained far beyond what any experiment can reach.
In his study, physicists took a different approach: suggesting that we can't pin down both the size and expansion rate of the universe at the same time with perfect accuracy. This limitation is built into the fundamental uncertainty that governs the quantum world: When applied to the universe as a whole, it subtly changes the equations that describe how cosmic expansion should behave over time. This built-in uncertainty could then produce exactly the kind of accelerating expansion that cosmologists currently attribute to dark energy.
Depending on the exact mathematical details, this macroscopic imprint of quantum gravity could also replace the singularity at the instant of the Big Bang, which cosmologists have long struggled to explain. Rather than relying on a point of infinite density, their proposal suggests that the Big Bang followed a gentler rebound from a previously contracting universe.
If this idea is correct, it could provide a far cleaner explanation for the origins of dark energy. In contrast to many existing theories, this would mean that the phenomenon doesn't need to be explained by some hidden particle or exotic field waiting to be discovered: Instead, it is a property of space itself, hiding in plain sight in our observations of the universe.
Savvas M. Koushiappas, Cosmological uncertainty relation and late-universe acceleration, Physical Review D (2026). DOI: 10.1103/zgnd-h2xv. On arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2604.27771
© 2026 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Science Simplified! to add comments!