Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
JAI VIGNAN
All about Science - to remove misconceptions and encourage scientific temper
Communicating science to the common people
'To make them see the world differently through the beautiful lense of science'
Members: 22
Latest Activity: 22 hours ago
WE LOVE SCIENCE HERE BECAUSE IT IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING
THIS IS A WAR ZONE WHERE SCIENCE FIGHTS WITH NONSENSE AND WINS
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
"Being a scientist is a state of mind, not a profession!"
"Science, when it's done right, can yield amazing things".
The Reach of Scientific Research From Labs to Laymen
The aim of science is not only to open a door to infinite knowledge and wisdom but to set a limit to infinite error.
"Knowledge is a Superpower but the irony is you cannot get enough of it with ever increasing data base unless you try to keep up with it constantly and in the right way!" The best education comes from learning from people who know what they are exactly talking about.
Science is this glorious adventure into the unknown, the opportunity to discover things that nobody knew before. And that’s just an experience that’s not to be missed. But it’s also a motivated effort to try to help humankind. And maybe that’s just by increasing human knowledge—because that’s a way to make us a nobler species.
If you are scientifically literate the world looks very different to you.
We do science and science communication not because they are easy but because they are difficult!
“Science is not a subject you studied in school. It’s life. We 're brought into existence by it!"
Links to some important articles :
1. Interactive science series...
a. how-to-do-research-and-write-research-papers-part 13
b. Some Qs people asked me on science and my replies to them...
Part 6, part-10, part-11, part-12, part 14 , part- 8,
part- 1, part-2, part-4, part-5, part-16, part-17, part-18 , part-19 , part-20
part-21 , part-22, part-23, part-24, part-25, part-26, part-27 , part-28
part-29, part-30, part-31, part-32, part-33, part-34, part-35, part-36, part-37,
part-38, part-40, part-41, part-42, part-43, part-44, part-45, part-46, part-47
Part 48, part49, Critical thinking -part 50 , part -51, part-52, part-53
part-54, part-55, part-57, part-58, part-59, part-60, part-61, part-62, part-63
part 64, part-65, part-66, part-67, part-68, part 69, part-70 part-71, part-73 ...
.......306
BP variations during pregnancy part-72
who is responsible for the gender of their children - a man or a woman -part-56
c. some-questions-people-asked-me-on-science-based-on-my-art-and-poems -part-7
d. science-s-rules-are-unyielding-they-will-not-be-bent-for-anybody-part-3-
e. debate-between-scientists-and-people-who-practice-and-propagate-pseudo-science - part -9
f. why astrology is pseudo-science part 15
g. How Science is demolishing patriarchal ideas - part-39
2. in-defence-of-mangalyaan-why-even-developing-countries-like-india need space research programmes
3. Science communication series:
a. science-communication - part 1
b. how-scienitsts-should-communicate-with-laymen - part 2
c. main-challenges-of-science-communication-and-how-to-overcome-them - part 3
d. the-importance-of-science-communication-through-art- part 4
e. why-science-communication-is-geting worse - part 5
f. why-science-journalism-is-not-taken-seriously-in-this-part-of-the-world - part 6
g. blogs-the-best-bet-to-communicate-science-by-scientists- part 7
h. why-it-is-difficult-for-scientists-to-debate-controversial-issues - part 8
i. science-writers-and-communicators-where-are-you - part 9
j. shooting-the-messengers-for-a-different-reason-for-conveying-the- part 10
k. why-is-science-journalism-different-from-other-forms-of-journalism - part 11
l. golden-rules-of-science-communication- Part 12
m. science-writers-should-develop-a-broader-view-to-put-things-in-th - part 13
n. an-informed-patient-is-the-most-cooperative-one -part 14
o. the-risks-scientists-will-have-to-face-while-communicating-science - part 15
p. the-most-difficult-part-of-science-communication - part 16
q. clarity-on-who-you-are-writing-for-is-important-before-sitting-to write a science story - part 17
r. science-communicators-get-thick-skinned-to-communicate-science-without-any-bias - part 18
s. is-post-truth-another-name-for-science-communication-failure?
t. why-is-it-difficult-for-scientists-to-have-high-eqs
u. art-and-literature-as-effective-aids-in-science-communication-and teaching
v.* some-qs-people-asked-me-on-science communication-and-my-replies-to-them
** qs-people-asked-me-on-science-and-my-replies-to-them-part-173
w. why-motivated-perception-influences-your-understanding-of-science
x. science-communication-in-uncertain-times
y. sci-com: why-keep-a-dog-and-bark-yourself
z. How to deal with sci com dilemmas?
A+. sci-com-what-makes-a-story-news-worthy-in-science
B+. is-a-perfect-language-important-in-writing-science-stories
C+. sci-com-how-much-entertainment-is-too-much-while-communicating-sc
D+. sci-com-why-can-t-everybody-understand-science-in-the-same-way
E+. how-to-successfully-negotiate-the-science-communication-maze
4. Health related topics:
a. why-antibiotic-resistance-is-increasing-and-how-scientists-are-tr
b. what-might-happen-when-you-take-lots-of-medicines
c. know-your-cesarean-facts-ladies
d. right-facts-about-menstruation
e. answer-to-the-question-why-on-big-c
f. how-scientists-are-identifying-new-preventive-measures-and-cures-
g. what-if-little-creatures-high-jack-your-brain-and-try-to-control-
h. who-knows-better?
k. can-rust-from-old-drinking-water-pipes-cause-health-problems
l. pvc-and-cpvc-pipes-should-not-be-used-for-drinking-water-supply
m. melioidosis
o. desensitization-and-transplant-success-story
p. do-you-think-the-medicines-you-are-taking-are-perfectly-alright-then revisit your position!
q. swine-flu-the-difficlulties-we-still-face-while-tackling-the-outb
r. dump-this-useless-information-into-a-garbage-bin-if-you-really-care about evidence based medicine
s. don-t-ignore-these-head-injuries
u. allergic- agony-caused-by-caterpillars-and-moths
General science:
a.why-do-water-bodies-suddenly-change-colour
b. don-t-knock-down-your-own-life-line
c. the-most-menacing-animal-in-the-world
d. how-exo-planets-are-detected
e. the-importance-of-earth-s-magnetic-field
f. saving-tigers-from-extinction-is-still-a-travail
g. the-importance-of-snakes-in-our-eco-systems
h. understanding-reverse-osmosis
i. the-importance-of-microbiomes
j. crispr-cas9-gene-editing-technique-a-boon-to-fixing-defective-gen
k. biomimicry-a-solution-to-some-of-our-problems
5. the-dilemmas-scientists-face
6. why-we-get-contradictory-reports-in-science
7. be-alert-pseudo-science-and-anti-science-are-on-prowl
8. science-will-answer-your-questions-and-solve-your-problems
9. how-science-debunks-baseless-beliefs
10. climate-science-and-its-relevance
11. the-road-to-a-healthy-life
12. relative-truth-about-gm-crops-and-foods
13. intuition-based-work-is-bad-science
14. how-science-explains-near-death-experiences
15. just-studies-are-different-from-thorough-scientific-research
16. lab-scientists-versus-internet-scientists
17. can-you-challenge-science?
18. the-myth-of-ritual-working
19.science-and-superstitions-how-rational-thinking-can-make-you-work-better
20. comets-are-not-harmful-or-bad-omens-so-enjoy-the-clestial-shows
21. explanation-of-mysterious-lights-during-earthquakes
22. science-can-tell-what-constitutes-the-beauty-of-a-rose
23. what-lessons-can-science-learn-from-tragedies-like-these
24. the-specific-traits-of-a-scientific-mind
25. science-and-the-paranormal
26. are-these-inventions-and-discoveries-really-accidental-and-intuitive like the journalists say?
27. how-the-brain-of-a-polymath-copes-with-all-the-things-it-does
28. how-to-make-scientific-research-in-india-a-success-story
29. getting-rid-of-plastic-the-natural-way
30. why-some-interesting-things-happen-in-nature
31. real-life-stories-that-proves-how-science-helps-you
32. Science and trust series:
a. how-to-trust-science-stories-a-guide-for-common-man
b. trust-in-science-what-makes-people-waver
c. standing-up-for-science-showing-reasons-why-science-should-be-trusted
You will find the entire list of discussions here: http://kkartlab.in/group/some-science/forum
( Please go through the comments section below to find scientific research reports posted on a daily basis and watch videos based on science)
Get interactive...
Please contact us if you want us to add any information or scientific explanation on any topic that interests you. We will try our level best to give you the right information.
Our mail ID: kkartlabin@gmail.com
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Thursday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: In your opinion, were the covid vaccines a success or a failure?Krishna: No, opinions don’t count in science. Only data and evidence.CDC data show that vaccination offered significant…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Wednesday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
The idea that aliens may have visited the Earth is becoming increasingly popular. Around a fifth of UK citizens …Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Monday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Why our solar system's moons have no ringsOf the nearly 300 moons found to date in our solar system, not a single one is a ringed moon!If giant planets in our Solar System have rings, and if…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Monday. 2 Replies 0 Likes
Q: Dr.Krishna, I have read your article on Nocebo Effect. But what…Continue
Comment
To determine how each of the viral serotypes affects the risk of severe disease, the researchers analyzed viral genetic data. The team also studied cases of patients hospitalized for dengue to determine which viral subtype caused their infections. Researchers gathered data from 21 years of dengue surveillance, ranging from 1994 to 2014, in a children's hospital in Bangkok, encompassing 15,281 individual cases. This allowed them to find repeat cases and each viral subtype in all infections.
Based on the pediatric patients' hospital records, researchers discovered a link between hospitalization and the order in which patients became infected with different dengue-virus serotypes. They were also able to determine which combinations of viral subtypes pointed to mild or severe forms of dengue. For instance, people who became infected with serotypes that were very similar, such as DENV-3 and DENV-4, or very different serotypes as in the case of DENV-1 and DENV-4, tended to have a lower risk of severe disease during the second infection.
Patients who were infected with serotypes that were only moderately different had a higher risk of severe symptoms in subsequent infections. The highest risk group in this category involved patients who had an initial infection with DENV-2 followed by a subsequent infection triggered by DENV-1.
The new research adds clarity to a disease risk that may seem paradoxical to the lay public. For example, most people infected with dengue virus for the first time develop extremely mild signs of the disease or none at all. But for those who do get sick, soaring fever, headache, body aches, nausea and rash are the primary symptoms, and they intensify in severe manifestations of the infection.
For more than a century a severe bout with dengue has been known as breakbone fever because of the intensity of the pain and accompanying muscle spasms.
The virus is carried in the tropics and subtropics by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, which are endemic in the dengue belt. But while the belt, which runs through latitudes 35-degrees North and 35-degrees South, has traditionally been home to dengue-carrying mosquitoes, the arthropods have been extending their range northward as global climate change intensifies, scientists say.
These findings suggest that immune imprinting helps determine dengue disease risk and provides a pathway to monitor the changing risk profile of populations and to quantifying risk profiles of candidate vaccines.
Lin Wang et al, Antigenic distance between primary and secondary dengue infections correlates with disease risk, Science Translational Medicine (2024). DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk3259
Part 3
**
The team also underscored how dengue, a pernicious tropical malady, can be understood within the context of other common viral diseases that circle the globe.
The ability of viruses, such as SARS-CoV- 2 and influenza, to continuously change their genetic structure in response to the selective pressure of population immunity complicates control efforts.
In the case of dengue virus, an arbovirus that infects more than 100 million people each year, the situation is even more complex. Individuals with high dengue virus antibody titers are protected from infection and developing severe disease.
However, individuals with sub-neutralizing antibody titers have been shown to have the highest risk of severe disease, through multiple hypothesized mechanisms including antibody-dependent enhancement.
A dengue infection can be tricky. Some patients who have weathered an infection but get infected in a subsequent outbreak can have more severe symptoms the second time around. Yet, most research on repeat dengue infections has regarded each of the serotypes as no different from the other. An assessment of each serotype's genetic differences was needed to provide a clearer picture of potential risks.
To develop that clearer picture, researchers studied each serotype in more than 15,000 patients' infections as a way to peel away much of the mystery surrounding why first-time dengue illnesses are traditionally milder than subsequent ones.
Part 2
A massive upsurge in dengue cases marked by multiple outbreaks is occurring worldwide and raising new questions about who is at elevated risk of severe forms of the mosquito-transmitted disease.
Incidence of the infection has increased by orders of magnitude throughout the so-called dengue belt, which encompasses Central and South America, Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia and swaths of the South Pacific, home to densely populated islands. Dengue, without question, is the most widespread and rapidly increasing vector-borne disease in the world, according to the World Health Organization.
The story is similar in other dengue-affected areas of the world where lapses in vector control have conspired with global climate change to create an explosion of bloodthirsty mosquitoes, swarms of them moving into regions once considered dengue-free. Only female mosquitoes feed on blood, they're in constant need of the nutrients in it to nurture their eggs.
Now, more than two decades of dengue surveillance is answering a slew of questions at a time when the world needs guidance most.
Findings from the research have revealed how various subgroups—what virologists call subtypes—of the dengue virus influence future risk of severe infection. It has been known for years that those who become infected in subsequent outbreaks, after a usually mild bout with a first-time infection, are at significant risk of severe disease in later dengue exposures. New research finally has analyzed more than 15,000 cases to discern why that is so.
Writing in Science Translational Medicine, a global team of scientists has explained how the four dengue viral subtypes—DENV-1, 2, 3, and 4—influence the risk of repeated severe infections. The findings provide a new framework for disease monitoring and lay the foundation for vaccination strategies as the new dengue immunizations emerge.
Part 1
Researchers approached this problem in many different ways.
In the context of this study, the researchers effectively provided two lines of evidence. The first one is theoretical in essence. Specifically, we rely on so-called Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) to demonstrate that confidence-based control policies are quasi-optimal for a broad class of decisions."
After having identified the non-trivial quantitative properties of confidence-based control policies, the researchers set out to determine whether these properties can be found in empirical data gathered in experiments where humans completed decision-making tasks. The properties they specifically sought for included three-way interactions between the values of different options, decision times and the reported confidence in a decision.
In brief, they identified a minimal cognitive architecture for quasi-optimal decision control (in terms of how much effort is invested). Importantly, this architecture may generalize over most, if not all, kinds of decision types. This implies that a single brain system may operate decision control, irrespective of the type of decision.
Juliette Bénon et al, The online metacognitive control of decisions, Communications Psychology (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00071-y.
Part 2
Neuroscientists and psychologists have been trying to pinpoint the processes behind human decision-making for decades. While their efforts led to numerous interesting insights, the intricacies of complex decision-making remain poorly understood.
Researchers at the Paris Brain Institute carried out a study aimed at better understanding how the human brain allocates its resources when making decisions. Their paper, published in Communications Psychology, introduces an architecture that operates the online metacognitive control of decisions (oMCD), a theoretical construct describing why and how the brain choses to stop of continue deliberating.
Past studies have found that humans do not always invest their maximum mental efforts when making decisions. This can lead to various widely documented errors and cognitive biases (i.e., recurring deviations from rational thinking).
So when making a decision, what determines the amount of mental effort we invest in decisions?
Previous behavioral research suggested that, for certain kinds of decisions (so-called 'evidence-based' decisions), this may be done by balancing decision confidence (which tends to increase with mental effort) with the cost of mental effort. This then triggered the question: can this work for all kinds of decisions?
To address this question, researchers should first demonstrate that a confidence-based control policy eventually yields mental effort investments resembling those of optimal control policies that are specific to different kinds of decisions. This was one of the primary objectives of this work.
Part 1
The plastic that eats itself
Our reliance on plastic has become a huge problem, which is why researchers are excited about a new type of material – one that comes with built-in biodegrading capabilities, due to the bacterial spores living inside it. The new self-digesting plastic combines thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and Bacillus subtilis bacteria, which had to be engineered to survive the high temperatures involved in plastic production. By repeatedly exposing the spores to increasing levels of heat, the team of researchers behind this new work found that the bacteria could eventually cope with the temperatures of 135 degrees Celsius (275 degrees Fahrenheit) required to mix the bacterial spores and TPU together. Past efforts to find ways to degrade plastics, fast, have often sourced bacterial enzymes and fungi from soils and compost heaps where those microbes are naturally abundant. But this new material needs only the bacterial spores inside it, reawakened with some nutrients and moisture, to start breaking down.
Greenhouse gas emissions from using basic stoves and deforestation from collecting wood also contribute hugely to global warming.
Switching to clean cooking methods, such as LPG or electric cooking, would save 1.5 billion tonnes of CO2 a year by 2030—roughly the amount emitted by ships and planes last year, according to the IEA.
IEA also recommends strong national leadership as well as grassroots efforts to change social norms.
Source: AFP and other news agencies
Fifty countries are meeting in France today to discuss the lack of access to clean cooking methods worldwide which causes millions of deaths every year and fuels global warming.
Some 2.3 billion people across 128 countries breathe in harmful smoke when they cook on basic stoves or over open fires, according to an International Energy Agency (IEA)-African Development Bank (ADB) report that sounded the alarm last year.
It said 3.7 million people a year die prematurely from harmful cooking practices, with children and women most at risk.
The IEA said the "unprecedented" Paris gathering aims to be "a moment of changing the direction". The problem "touches on gender, it touches on forestry, it touches on climate change, it touches on energy, it touches on health.
A third of the world cooks with fuels which produce harmful fumes when burned, including wood, charcoal, coal, animal dung and agricultural waste.
They pollute indoor and outdoor air with fine particles that penetrate the lungs and cause multiple respiratory and cardiovascular problems, including cancer and strokes.
These cooking practices are the third highest cause of premature deaths in the world and the second highest in Africa. In young children , they are a major cause of pneumonia, experts say.
They also prevent women and children from accessing education or earning a wage, as they spend hours looking for fuel.
Part 1
Mojo Lens, an in-development contact lens with an embedded augmented reality display and the electronics needed to run it wirelessly. With a tethered prototype held up to our eye, we could clearly see how the .5mm wide microLED shows images and text as well as a user interface that can be controlled with literal eye tracking. Here's how the Mojo system works and exactly what hardware is packed inside this smart contact lens!
We generally assume that when humans are walking or otherwise moving in space, their head faces towards the direction they are traveling in. Nonetheless, travel direction and head direction are distinct factors associated with the processing of different types of spatial information.
Researchers recently unveiled a travel direction-related signal represented in the human mind that appears to be independent from head direction. Their paper, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, could soon open new avenues for neuroscience and psychology research focusing on spatial navigation.
Finding your way can be complicated, but in some ways keeping track of your position requires a few basic pieces of information—your speed, how long you have been going, what direction you are going in.
Head direction and travel direction have been found to provide very different information. Overall, travel direction plays a greater role than head direction in shaping the trajectory that humans or animals will follow while moving in their surrounding environment.
Moreover, studies found that people's heads are not always facing the direction they are going in.
Researchers carried out a behavioral experiment aimed at searching for a travel direction signal that is entirely separate from head direction.
This recent study ( and its results) was the first to hint at the existence of a signal of travel direction in humans that is independent from head direction. The findings it gathered prompt interesting new questions about the unique contributions of travel direction to spatial navigation.
You Cheng et al, (Don't) look where you are going: Evidence for a travel direction signal in humans that is independent of head direction., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (2024). DOI: 10.1037/xge0001538.
© 2024 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Science Simplified! to add comments!