Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
JAI VIGNAN
All about Science - to remove misconceptions and encourage scientific temper
Communicating science to the common people
'To make them see the world differently through the beautiful lense of science'
Members: 22
Latest Activity: 4 minutes ago
WE LOVE SCIENCE HERE BECAUSE IT IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING
THIS IS A WAR ZONE WHERE SCIENCE FIGHTS WITH NONSENSE AND WINS
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
"Being a scientist is a state of mind, not a profession!"
"Science, when it's done right, can yield amazing things".
The Reach of Scientific Research From Labs to Laymen
The aim of science is not only to open a door to infinite knowledge and wisdom but to set a limit to infinite error.
"Knowledge is a Superpower but the irony is you cannot get enough of it with ever increasing data base unless you try to keep up with it constantly and in the right way!" The best education comes from learning from people who know what they are exactly talking about.
Science is this glorious adventure into the unknown, the opportunity to discover things that nobody knew before. And that’s just an experience that’s not to be missed. But it’s also a motivated effort to try to help humankind. And maybe that’s just by increasing human knowledge—because that’s a way to make us a nobler species.
If you are scientifically literate the world looks very different to you.
We do science and science communication not because they are easy but because they are difficult!
“Science is not a subject you studied in school. It’s life. We 're brought into existence by it!"
Links to some important articles :
1. Interactive science series...
a. how-to-do-research-and-write-research-papers-part 13
b. Some Qs people asked me on science and my replies to them...
Part 6, part-10, part-11, part-12, part 14 , part- 8,
part- 1, part-2, part-4, part-5, part-16, part-17, part-18 , part-19 , part-20
part-21 , part-22, part-23, part-24, part-25, part-26, part-27 , part-28
part-29, part-30, part-31, part-32, part-33, part-34, part-35, part-36, part-37,
part-38, part-40, part-41, part-42, part-43, part-44, part-45, part-46, part-47
Part 48, part49, Critical thinking -part 50 , part -51, part-52, part-53
part-54, part-55, part-57, part-58, part-59, part-60, part-61, part-62, part-63
part 64, part-65, part-66, part-67, part-68, part 69, part-70 part-71, part-73 ...
.......306
BP variations during pregnancy part-72
who is responsible for the gender of their children - a man or a woman -part-56
c. some-questions-people-asked-me-on-science-based-on-my-art-and-poems -part-7
d. science-s-rules-are-unyielding-they-will-not-be-bent-for-anybody-part-3-
e. debate-between-scientists-and-people-who-practice-and-propagate-pseudo-science - part -9
f. why astrology is pseudo-science part 15
g. How Science is demolishing patriarchal ideas - part-39
2. in-defence-of-mangalyaan-why-even-developing-countries-like-india need space research programmes
3. Science communication series:
a. science-communication - part 1
b. how-scienitsts-should-communicate-with-laymen - part 2
c. main-challenges-of-science-communication-and-how-to-overcome-them - part 3
d. the-importance-of-science-communication-through-art- part 4
e. why-science-communication-is-geting worse - part 5
f. why-science-journalism-is-not-taken-seriously-in-this-part-of-the-world - part 6
g. blogs-the-best-bet-to-communicate-science-by-scientists- part 7
h. why-it-is-difficult-for-scientists-to-debate-controversial-issues - part 8
i. science-writers-and-communicators-where-are-you - part 9
j. shooting-the-messengers-for-a-different-reason-for-conveying-the- part 10
k. why-is-science-journalism-different-from-other-forms-of-journalism - part 11
l. golden-rules-of-science-communication- Part 12
m. science-writers-should-develop-a-broader-view-to-put-things-in-th - part 13
n. an-informed-patient-is-the-most-cooperative-one -part 14
o. the-risks-scientists-will-have-to-face-while-communicating-science - part 15
p. the-most-difficult-part-of-science-communication - part 16
q. clarity-on-who-you-are-writing-for-is-important-before-sitting-to write a science story - part 17
r. science-communicators-get-thick-skinned-to-communicate-science-without-any-bias - part 18
s. is-post-truth-another-name-for-science-communication-failure?
t. why-is-it-difficult-for-scientists-to-have-high-eqs
u. art-and-literature-as-effective-aids-in-science-communication-and teaching
v.* some-qs-people-asked-me-on-science communication-and-my-replies-to-them
** qs-people-asked-me-on-science-and-my-replies-to-them-part-173
w. why-motivated-perception-influences-your-understanding-of-science
x. science-communication-in-uncertain-times
y. sci-com: why-keep-a-dog-and-bark-yourself
z. How to deal with sci com dilemmas?
A+. sci-com-what-makes-a-story-news-worthy-in-science
B+. is-a-perfect-language-important-in-writing-science-stories
C+. sci-com-how-much-entertainment-is-too-much-while-communicating-sc
D+. sci-com-why-can-t-everybody-understand-science-in-the-same-way
E+. how-to-successfully-negotiate-the-science-communication-maze
4. Health related topics:
a. why-antibiotic-resistance-is-increasing-and-how-scientists-are-tr
b. what-might-happen-when-you-take-lots-of-medicines
c. know-your-cesarean-facts-ladies
d. right-facts-about-menstruation
e. answer-to-the-question-why-on-big-c
f. how-scientists-are-identifying-new-preventive-measures-and-cures-
g. what-if-little-creatures-high-jack-your-brain-and-try-to-control-
h. who-knows-better?
k. can-rust-from-old-drinking-water-pipes-cause-health-problems
l. pvc-and-cpvc-pipes-should-not-be-used-for-drinking-water-supply
m. melioidosis
o. desensitization-and-transplant-success-story
p. do-you-think-the-medicines-you-are-taking-are-perfectly-alright-then revisit your position!
q. swine-flu-the-difficlulties-we-still-face-while-tackling-the-outb
r. dump-this-useless-information-into-a-garbage-bin-if-you-really-care about evidence based medicine
s. don-t-ignore-these-head-injuries
u. allergic- agony-caused-by-caterpillars-and-moths
General science:
a.why-do-water-bodies-suddenly-change-colour
b. don-t-knock-down-your-own-life-line
c. the-most-menacing-animal-in-the-world
d. how-exo-planets-are-detected
e. the-importance-of-earth-s-magnetic-field
f. saving-tigers-from-extinction-is-still-a-travail
g. the-importance-of-snakes-in-our-eco-systems
h. understanding-reverse-osmosis
i. the-importance-of-microbiomes
j. crispr-cas9-gene-editing-technique-a-boon-to-fixing-defective-gen
k. biomimicry-a-solution-to-some-of-our-problems
5. the-dilemmas-scientists-face
6. why-we-get-contradictory-reports-in-science
7. be-alert-pseudo-science-and-anti-science-are-on-prowl
8. science-will-answer-your-questions-and-solve-your-problems
9. how-science-debunks-baseless-beliefs
10. climate-science-and-its-relevance
11. the-road-to-a-healthy-life
12. relative-truth-about-gm-crops-and-foods
13. intuition-based-work-is-bad-science
14. how-science-explains-near-death-experiences
15. just-studies-are-different-from-thorough-scientific-research
16. lab-scientists-versus-internet-scientists
17. can-you-challenge-science?
18. the-myth-of-ritual-working
19.science-and-superstitions-how-rational-thinking-can-make-you-work-better
20. comets-are-not-harmful-or-bad-omens-so-enjoy-the-clestial-shows
21. explanation-of-mysterious-lights-during-earthquakes
22. science-can-tell-what-constitutes-the-beauty-of-a-rose
23. what-lessons-can-science-learn-from-tragedies-like-these
24. the-specific-traits-of-a-scientific-mind
25. science-and-the-paranormal
26. are-these-inventions-and-discoveries-really-accidental-and-intuitive like the journalists say?
27. how-the-brain-of-a-polymath-copes-with-all-the-things-it-does
28. how-to-make-scientific-research-in-india-a-success-story
29. getting-rid-of-plastic-the-natural-way
30. why-some-interesting-things-happen-in-nature
31. real-life-stories-that-proves-how-science-helps-you
32. Science and trust series:
a. how-to-trust-science-stories-a-guide-for-common-man
b. trust-in-science-what-makes-people-waver
c. standing-up-for-science-showing-reasons-why-science-should-be-trusted
You will find the entire list of discussions here: http://kkartlab.in/group/some-science/forum
( Please go through the comments section below to find scientific research reports posted on a daily basis and watch videos based on science)
Get interactive...
Please contact us if you want us to add any information or scientific explanation on any topic that interests you. We will try our level best to give you the right information.
Our mail ID: kkartlabin@gmail.com
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa yesterday. 2 Replies 1 Like
Interactive science series Part IIIWhen we asked people visiting this network to send in their requests for topics that interest them, several people started asking us…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Monday. 22 Replies 2 Likes
What might happen when you take lots of medicines...One of our uncles died of liver cirrhosis ten years back. He never touched alcohol in his life. He didn't have any viral infection to cause this. He didn't have diabetes, heart problems and he was…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Sunday. 3 Replies 0 Likes
"Luck?'' 'What is it?' This question 's asked by several scientists! Not lay men! Surprised?! Some people asked me to define luck in terms of science. So I made an attempt.True scientists don't believe in luck! They are go-getters and think only…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa Apr 1. 8 Replies 1 Like
Ladies and gentlemen say 'no' to this toxic empowerment. We had a discussion on reforms recently. During the process some people expressed the opinion that women should not be judged as persons with loose morals…Continue
Comment
The human eye functions like an exceptionally precise, high-end camera, one with a resolution of around 576 megapixels. What makes it intriguing is that although our eyes can focus on light at only one wavelength at a time, the result isn't fragmented or blurry. What we see feels seamlessly sharp and rich in details. This raises the question of which color it chooses to focus on when the scene we are looking at has multiple colors. A recent study published in Science Advances presents a mechanism that guides the choice.
The researchers discovered that the eye chooses its focus to maximize the quality of signals in specific neural pathways called color-opponent channels. These channels are neural pathways that combine signals from the three types of cone photoreceptors—long, medium, and short—into distinct patterns for color processing. These combinations create three channels: red–green, blue–yellow, and finally black–white, which represents brightness. Each channel operates in opposition, meaning that the two colors in a pair, such as red and green, cannot be perceived simultaneously.
This new discovery challenges the leading theory on which color the eyes choose to focus on.
In the real world, objects are almost never perfectly in focus, and the eyes constantly adjust to see objects clearly at different distances via a process called accommodation. This lack of focus is because visible light is made up of many different wavelengths, and each one bends slightly differently as it passes through the eye. Short wavelengths, such as blue light, focus closer to the lens; while longer ones, such as red light, focus farther away. Since the retina sits at a fixed distance behind the lens, not all wavelengths can be in focus at once, which creates a multi-colored blur known as longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA).
Previously scientists thought that the eyes' choice of colour on which to focus hinged on achieving the best possible visual acuity—our ability to see fine details. The idea was that this mechanism worked by maximizing luminance contrast, enhancing the overall brightness and clarity of an image. However, this new discovery challenges that long-held notion.
The new study questions the prevailing theory, suggesting that brightness and contrast alone don't fully explain how the eye focuses on colored objects. There must be color-processing mechanisms at play too. To test this, the researchers used a combination of specialized hardware, personalized eye mapping, and computer simulations.
The results showed that the human eye doesn't just focus on light to make images as sharp and bright as possible, as scientists long thought. Instead, the eye picks which color on which to focus based on what allows the brain's color-processing pathways to work most efficiently.
The team also found that instead of focusing on extreme wavelengths like blue, the eye often chooses a middle wavelength like greenish-yellow as a compromise. This approach keeps the main image sharp while leaving the blue areas slightly blurry, resulting in a stronger, clearer signal for the brain to process.
Benjamin M. Chin et al, Focusing on color: How the eye chooses which wavelength to see best, Science Advances (2026). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aea5693
AI makes rewilding look tame—and misses its messy reality
AI-generated images of rewilded British landscapes tend to depict sanitized, orderly scenes lacking ecological complexity, messiness, and controversial species. These images often exclude humans, decay, and less charismatic wildlife, reflecting the sanitized visuals promoted by environmental organizations. Accurate, ecologically rich depictions require highly specific prompts, limiting their accessibility to non-experts.
Bacteria are weaving forever chemicals directly into their cell membranes, study finds
Bacteria can incorporate polyfluoroalkyl carboxylates, a type of PFAS, directly into their cell membrane lipids. This process demonstrates a biological interaction with these persistent environmental contaminants and suggests a potential microbial role in PFAS transformation, though complete degradation and disposal remain unresolved challenges.
Yongchao Xie et al, Bacteria covalently incorporate polyfluoroalkyl carboxylates into membrane lipids, Nature Microbiology (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41564-026-02301-x
How a common herbicide affects honeybee brains and behaviour
Exposure to glyphosate, a widely used herbicide, reduces honeybee foraging by 13% and alters brain neurochemistry, even at sublethal levels. These changes may compromise colony stability, pollination effectiveness, and honey production, indicating that glyphosate poses a greater risk to honeybee health than previously recognized.
Laura C. McHenry et al, Sublethal glyphosate exposure reduces honey bee foraging and alters the balance of biogenic amines in the brain, Journal of Experimental Biology (2025). DOI: 10.1242/jeb.250124
Why cutting down rainforests may be driving 28,000 heat deaths a year
Tropical deforestation significantly increases local temperatures by reducing the cooling effects of forest canopy and evapotranspiration. This regional warming exposes over 300 million people to higher heat stress, contributing to an estimated 28,000 heat-related deaths annually across the tropics, highlighting deforestation as a critical public health issue.
How one 'forever chemical' can disrupt a baby's facial development
Researchers have long associated per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as "forever chemicals," with certain severe birth defects, but exactly how these pollutants harm a developing fetus has remained mostly a mystery. New research now provides the first clear molecular explanation, showing how one PFAS, called perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), can trigger craniofacial abnormalities before birth. The research was published today in Chemical Research in Toxicology.
Most people are exposed to small amounts of PFAS in everyday life but higher exposure can occur through contaminated water, living near manufacturing sites or certain jobs like firefighting and ski waxing, which is why it's so important to understand the chemicals better.
There are approximately 15,000 PFAS used in consumer and industrial products, but scientists are increasingly finding that only some pose serious health risks. In this study, researchers tested 139 commonly found PFAS and discovered PFDA as the most toxic during fetal craniofacial development.
They found even tiny amounts of PFDA were enough to cause visible facial changes, with the risk increasing by 10% at extremely low exposure levels.
They found that PFAS disrupts retinoic acid, a molecule essential for shaping the face and head during early pregnancy. Retinoic acid regulates hundreds of genes and its levels must be controlled. Because a fetus cannot produce or safely eliminate excess retinoic acid, it relies entirely on the mother to maintain the homeostatic balance of the hormone.
The researchers discovered PFDA blocks CYP26A1, a key enzyme responsible for breaking down excess retinoic acid. When this enzyme is inhibited, retinoic acid levels can rise too high, disrupting normal facial development. PFDA also suppresses the genes that produce this enzyme through a separate biological pathway, delivering a "double hit" to the system that regulates early development.
As a result, severe craniofacial abnormalities can develop, including underdeveloped eyes and abnormal jaw formation, which were the most common effects of PFDA exposure during fetal development.
Michaela Hvizdak et al, New Mechanistic Evidence for Perfluorodecanoic Acid (PFDA) Teratogenicity via CYP26A1-Mediated Retinoic Acid Metabolism and Signaling, Chemical Research in Toxicology (2026). DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00468 pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00468
A research team has, for the first time in the world, elucidated the microscopic mechanism by which quantum order is lost and collapses in "open quantum environments" existing in nature. Since perfectly isolated quantum systems cannot exist in reality, this study is expected to provide a decisive breakthrough in bridging the gap between ideal quantum theory and quantum technologies that must operate in real-world environments.
"High-order harmonics," generated when intense light is irradiated onto solid materials, have high academic and industrial value, as they are used for material characterization as well as for generating ultrafast pulses and high-energy light. However, during this process, a phenomenon known as "ultrafast electronic decoherence" occurs, in which the intrinsic quantum state becomes disrupted within an extremely short timescale of 1–2 femtoseconds. The fundamental cause of this phenomenon had remained unknown despite more than a decade of extensive research worldwide.
To solve this puzzle, researchers developed and applied a novel computational approach based on the "Lindblad master equation," overcoming the limitations of conventional quantum master equations. This enabled the establishment of a microscopic theoretical research framework that can precisely account for not only electron–electron interactions but also interactions between electrons and their surrounding environment.
The team analyzed the phenomena of "superradiance" and "broadband emission" observed in the process of high-order harmonic generation in solids, and newly found that interference occurs between the two, leading to mutual cancellation.
As a result, they confirmed that interactions with the environment (such as superradiance) in open quantum environments play a decisive role in governing ultrafast electronic decoherence in solids, thereby resolving a long-standing challenge in the field.
Through this study, they have found that ultrafast electronic decoherence in solids—long regarded as a mystery for over a decade—originates from environmental interactions in open quantum systems.
Gimin Bae et al, Superradiance and Broadband Emission Driving Fast Electron Dephasing in Open Quantum Systems, Advanced Science (2026). DOI: 10.1002/advs.202522729
Ghostly particles: Dark radiation may have masqueraded as neutrinos
New research suggests that neutrinos in the early universe may have transformed into a previously unknown form of radiation. The study offers a new way to explain certain puzzling observations about how the universe evolved.
Neutrinos are among the most abundant particles in the universe. Often described as ghostlike because they interact so weakly with matter, neutrinos play an important role in shaping how cosmic structures form and evolve.
Recent analyses of cosmological data suggest that neutrinos may interact with one another more strongly than predicted by the standard model of particle physics, although laboratory experiments place strict limits on such interactions.
The new study offers a possible explanation for this apparent mismatch. According to the researchers, the cosmological signals interpreted as evidence for strongly interacting neutrinos could instead be produced by an additional component of radiation in the early universe.
Because cosmological observations mainly measure the total amount of fast-moving radiation, they cannot easily distinguish neutrinos from other lightweight particles that behave similarly.
They propose that some fraction of neutrinos converted into a different type of light, fast-moving radiation known as dark radiation, during the universe's earliest moments.
The transformation must have taken place after Big Bang nucleosynthesis, but before the formation of the cosmic microwave background.
In this scenario, dark radiation could mimic the cosmological effects attributed to interacting neutrinos while avoiding the experimental constraints that apply to neutrinos themselves.
If this dark radiation mechanism occurred, it could also influence several ongoing puzzles in cosmology. These include uncertainties in neutrino masses and the long-standing Hubble tension, which is the discrepancy between different measurements of how quickly the universe is expanding.
Future observations may help test the idea.
Anirban Das et al, Impostor among Neutrinos: Dark Radiation Masquerading as Self-Interacting Neutrinos, Physical Review Letters (2026). DOI: 10.1103/jprg-jll6. On arXiv: DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2506.08085
**
India’s air combat strategy during Operation Sindoor is drawing global attention, and now a former US combat pilot has called it a “genius move.” The focus is on how Indian Rafale jets used advanced decoy systems to confuse enemy radars and missiles. Instead of relying only on speed and firepower, Indian pilots deployed towed decoys and dropped fuel tanks at the right moment, creating multiple false targets in the sky. This made it difficult for enemy systems to identify the real aircraft. The result? Missiles were likely tracking expendable objects instead of actual jets. The tactic also created confusion on the battlefield, making it harder for the opponent to assess damage accurately. This is modern warfare, where technology, deception, and timing matter as much as weapons. Operation Sindoor has now become a case study in how India is adapting to next-generation air combat with precision and planning.
It has been observed in other systems, but studying how this scenario might play out in a light field is somewhat trickier. Much work has been done in physics labs to study it, but observations of optical vortices have been limited by the technology's inability to keep up with the speed at which vortex formation, motion, and collision unfold.
To overcome these limitations, researchers recorded the behavior of optical vortices in a two-dimensional material called hexagonal boron nitride.
This material supports unusual light waves called phonon polaritons – hybrids of light and atomic vibrations – that move much more slowly than light alone and can be tightly confined. This creates intricate interference patterns filled with many vortices, allowing the researchers to track their motion in detail.
The second, crucial part was capturing those dynamics in real time. The team deployed a specialized high-speed electron microscope with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution, which recorded events unfolding over just 3 quadrillionths of a second.
They ran the experiment many times, each time recording at a slight delay compared to the previous run. By stacking together the hundreds of images generated this way, the researchers created a timelapse of the vortices as they hurtled towards and annihilated each other, their velocities very briefly reaching superluminal speeds in the process.
The experiment took place in a two-dimensional context. The next step, the researchers say, is to try to extend their work into higher dimensions to observe more complicated behavior. They also say the techniques they developed could help address some of the current limitations of electron microscopy.
"We believe these innovative microscopy techniques will enable the study of hidden processes in physics, chemistry, and biology," the researchers say, "revealing for the first time how nature behaves in its fastest and most elusive moments."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10209-z
Part 2
**
© 2026 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Science Simplified! to add comments!