Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
JAI VIGNAN
All about Science - to remove misconceptions and encourage scientific temper
Communicating science to the common people
'To make them see the world differently through the beautiful lense of science'
Members: 22
Latest Activity: 20 hours ago
WE LOVE SCIENCE HERE BECAUSE IT IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING
THIS IS A WAR ZONE WHERE SCIENCE FIGHTS WITH NONSENSE AND WINS
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
"Being a scientist is a state of mind, not a profession!"
"Science, when it's done right, can yield amazing things".
The Reach of Scientific Research From Labs to Laymen
The aim of science is not only to open a door to infinite knowledge and wisdom but to set a limit to infinite error.
"Knowledge is a Superpower but the irony is you cannot get enough of it with ever increasing data base unless you try to keep up with it constantly and in the right way!" The best education comes from learning from people who know what they are exactly talking about.
Science is this glorious adventure into the unknown, the opportunity to discover things that nobody knew before. And that’s just an experience that’s not to be missed. But it’s also a motivated effort to try to help humankind. And maybe that’s just by increasing human knowledge—because that’s a way to make us a nobler species.
If you are scientifically literate the world looks very different to you.
We do science and science communication not because they are easy but because they are difficult!
“Science is not a subject you studied in school. It’s life. We 're brought into existence by it!"
Links to some important articles :
1. Interactive science series...
a. how-to-do-research-and-write-research-papers-part 13
b. Some Qs people asked me on science and my replies to them...
Part 6, part-10, part-11, part-12, part 14 , part- 8,
part- 1, part-2, part-4, part-5, part-16, part-17, part-18 , part-19 , part-20
part-21 , part-22, part-23, part-24, part-25, part-26, part-27 , part-28
part-29, part-30, part-31, part-32, part-33, part-34, part-35, part-36, part-37,
part-38, part-40, part-41, part-42, part-43, part-44, part-45, part-46, part-47
Part 48, part49, Critical thinking -part 50 , part -51, part-52, part-53
part-54, part-55, part-57, part-58, part-59, part-60, part-61, part-62, part-63
part 64, part-65, part-66, part-67, part-68, part 69, part-70 part-71, part-73 ...
.......306
BP variations during pregnancy part-72
who is responsible for the gender of their children - a man or a woman -part-56
c. some-questions-people-asked-me-on-science-based-on-my-art-and-poems -part-7
d. science-s-rules-are-unyielding-they-will-not-be-bent-for-anybody-part-3-
e. debate-between-scientists-and-people-who-practice-and-propagate-pseudo-science - part -9
f. why astrology is pseudo-science part 15
g. How Science is demolishing patriarchal ideas - part-39
2. in-defence-of-mangalyaan-why-even-developing-countries-like-india need space research programmes
3. Science communication series:
a. science-communication - part 1
b. how-scienitsts-should-communicate-with-laymen - part 2
c. main-challenges-of-science-communication-and-how-to-overcome-them - part 3
d. the-importance-of-science-communication-through-art- part 4
e. why-science-communication-is-geting worse - part 5
f. why-science-journalism-is-not-taken-seriously-in-this-part-of-the-world - part 6
g. blogs-the-best-bet-to-communicate-science-by-scientists- part 7
h. why-it-is-difficult-for-scientists-to-debate-controversial-issues - part 8
i. science-writers-and-communicators-where-are-you - part 9
j. shooting-the-messengers-for-a-different-reason-for-conveying-the- part 10
k. why-is-science-journalism-different-from-other-forms-of-journalism - part 11
l. golden-rules-of-science-communication- Part 12
m. science-writers-should-develop-a-broader-view-to-put-things-in-th - part 13
n. an-informed-patient-is-the-most-cooperative-one -part 14
o. the-risks-scientists-will-have-to-face-while-communicating-science - part 15
p. the-most-difficult-part-of-science-communication - part 16
q. clarity-on-who-you-are-writing-for-is-important-before-sitting-to write a science story - part 17
r. science-communicators-get-thick-skinned-to-communicate-science-without-any-bias - part 18
s. is-post-truth-another-name-for-science-communication-failure?
t. why-is-it-difficult-for-scientists-to-have-high-eqs
u. art-and-literature-as-effective-aids-in-science-communication-and teaching
v.* some-qs-people-asked-me-on-science communication-and-my-replies-to-them
** qs-people-asked-me-on-science-and-my-replies-to-them-part-173
w. why-motivated-perception-influences-your-understanding-of-science
x. science-communication-in-uncertain-times
y. sci-com: why-keep-a-dog-and-bark-yourself
z. How to deal with sci com dilemmas?
A+. sci-com-what-makes-a-story-news-worthy-in-science
B+. is-a-perfect-language-important-in-writing-science-stories
C+. sci-com-how-much-entertainment-is-too-much-while-communicating-sc
D+. sci-com-why-can-t-everybody-understand-science-in-the-same-way
E+. how-to-successfully-negotiate-the-science-communication-maze
4. Health related topics:
a. why-antibiotic-resistance-is-increasing-and-how-scientists-are-tr
b. what-might-happen-when-you-take-lots-of-medicines
c. know-your-cesarean-facts-ladies
d. right-facts-about-menstruation
e. answer-to-the-question-why-on-big-c
f. how-scientists-are-identifying-new-preventive-measures-and-cures-
g. what-if-little-creatures-high-jack-your-brain-and-try-to-control-
h. who-knows-better?
k. can-rust-from-old-drinking-water-pipes-cause-health-problems
l. pvc-and-cpvc-pipes-should-not-be-used-for-drinking-water-supply
m. melioidosis
o. desensitization-and-transplant-success-story
p. do-you-think-the-medicines-you-are-taking-are-perfectly-alright-then revisit your position!
q. swine-flu-the-difficlulties-we-still-face-while-tackling-the-outb
r. dump-this-useless-information-into-a-garbage-bin-if-you-really-care about evidence based medicine
s. don-t-ignore-these-head-injuries
u. allergic- agony-caused-by-caterpillars-and-moths
General science:
a.why-do-water-bodies-suddenly-change-colour
b. don-t-knock-down-your-own-life-line
c. the-most-menacing-animal-in-the-world
d. how-exo-planets-are-detected
e. the-importance-of-earth-s-magnetic-field
f. saving-tigers-from-extinction-is-still-a-travail
g. the-importance-of-snakes-in-our-eco-systems
h. understanding-reverse-osmosis
i. the-importance-of-microbiomes
j. crispr-cas9-gene-editing-technique-a-boon-to-fixing-defective-gen
k. biomimicry-a-solution-to-some-of-our-problems
5. the-dilemmas-scientists-face
6. why-we-get-contradictory-reports-in-science
7. be-alert-pseudo-science-and-anti-science-are-on-prowl
8. science-will-answer-your-questions-and-solve-your-problems
9. how-science-debunks-baseless-beliefs
10. climate-science-and-its-relevance
11. the-road-to-a-healthy-life
12. relative-truth-about-gm-crops-and-foods
13. intuition-based-work-is-bad-science
14. how-science-explains-near-death-experiences
15. just-studies-are-different-from-thorough-scientific-research
16. lab-scientists-versus-internet-scientists
17. can-you-challenge-science?
18. the-myth-of-ritual-working
19.science-and-superstitions-how-rational-thinking-can-make-you-work-better
20. comets-are-not-harmful-or-bad-omens-so-enjoy-the-clestial-shows
21. explanation-of-mysterious-lights-during-earthquakes
22. science-can-tell-what-constitutes-the-beauty-of-a-rose
23. what-lessons-can-science-learn-from-tragedies-like-these
24. the-specific-traits-of-a-scientific-mind
25. science-and-the-paranormal
26. are-these-inventions-and-discoveries-really-accidental-and-intuitive like the journalists say?
27. how-the-brain-of-a-polymath-copes-with-all-the-things-it-does
28. how-to-make-scientific-research-in-india-a-success-story
29. getting-rid-of-plastic-the-natural-way
30. why-some-interesting-things-happen-in-nature
31. real-life-stories-that-proves-how-science-helps-you
32. Science and trust series:
a. how-to-trust-science-stories-a-guide-for-common-man
b. trust-in-science-what-makes-people-waver
c. standing-up-for-science-showing-reasons-why-science-should-be-trusted
You will find the entire list of discussions here: http://kkartlab.in/group/some-science/forum
( Please go through the comments section below to find scientific research reports posted on a daily basis and watch videos based on science)
Get interactive...
Please contact us if you want us to add any information or scientific explanation on any topic that interests you. We will try our level best to give you the right information.
Our mail ID: kkartlabin@gmail.com
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa 21 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
After months of relentlessly miserable weather for most of the UK, spring brings renewed enthusiasm for spending time outdoors hiking, wild swimming, paddling, or on walks.…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa yesterday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
After successfully completing their mission to the moon, the Artemis II crew are about to return to Earth.The four astronauts set a new record for how far humans have traveled from Earth, reaching a maximum distance of 406,771 kilometers from our…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Thursday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Hummingbirds’ metabolisms are so fast that they face an ever-looming threat: running out of energy and dropping dead. That’s why the birds evolved a physiological trick, an ability at the centre of a study* by researchers.It’s called torpor – a…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Wednesday. 19 Replies 0 Likes
Recent measles outbreak in the California state of the US ( now spread to other states too) tells an interesting story.Vaccines are not responsible for the woes people face but because of rejection of people to get vaccinated the problems…Continue
Comment
People use the same neurons to see and imagine objects, study shows
Why can images of things we have seen seem so real when we later recall them from memory? A new study led by Cedars-Sinai Health Sciences University investigators sheds light on the answer. The research shows that the same brain neurons are activated when we imagine something and when we perceive something. The research, led by Cedars-Sinai, is the first to provide a detailed understanding of the shared mechanism that underlies visual perception and creation of mental images in the human brain. It was published in the journal Science.
Visual perception and imagination activate overlapping populations of neurons in the human fusiform gyrus, with about 40% of visually responsive neurons reactivating during mental imagery using the same neural code as during perception. This shared neural mechanism underlies the vividness of visual imagination and may inform understanding of psychiatric disorders involving altered mental imagery.
We generate a mental image of an object that we have seen before by reactivating the brain cells we used to see it in the first place.
The new study revealed the code that we use to re-create the images.
The findings provide a biological basis for visual imagination, a process that is also critical for creative arts.
"Further insight into this neural process has the potential to open pathways toward developing new therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and other mental conditions that involve uncontrolled vivid imagery.
To conduct the study, investigators asked 16 adults with epilepsy, who had electrodes temporarily implanted in their brains for diagnosing their seizures, to view a series of images of faces and objects.
After viewing them, a subset of the participants were asked to imagine those same images from memory. Meanwhile, researchers recorded the electrical activity of hundreds of individual neurons in each participant's brain.
When the patients viewed the images, neurons were activated in their fusiform gyrus, an area of the brain essential for high-level visual processing, particularly for faces. For 80% of the visually responsive neurons recorded in the study, the researchers uncovered the aspects of the images they reacted to, thereby revealing their neural code.
When the patients later imagined the images, about 40% of these neurons reactivated using the same code, thereby recreating the pattern of activity that occurred during the initial viewing of the images.
V. S. Wadia et al, A shared code for perceiving and imagining objects in human ventral temporal cortex, Science (2026). DOI: 10.1126/science.adt8343. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adt8343
Non-coding genes cause diabetes in babies, study reveals
Bi-allelic variants in the non-coding RNA genes RNU4ATAC and RNU6ATAC were identified as causes of syndromic monogenic autoimmune neonatal diabetes in 19 children. These mutations disrupt splicing and affect the expression of approximately 800 genes, many involved in immune function, highlighting the pathogenic potential of non-coding genomic regions in rare autoimmune diabetes.
Matthew B. Johnson et al, Bi-allelic variants in the non-protein-coding minor spliceosome components RNU6ATAC and RNU4ATAC cause syndromic monogenic autoimmune diabetes, The American Journal of Human Genetics (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2026.02.017
Non-coding genes cause diabetes in babies, study reveals
Bi-allelic variants in the non-coding RNA genes RNU4ATAC and RNU6ATAC were identified as causes of syndromic monogenic autoimmune neonatal diabetes in 19 children. These mutations disrupt splicing and affect the expression of approximately 800 genes, many involved in immune function, highlighting the pathogenic potential of non-coding genomic regions in rare autoimmune diabetes.
Matthew B. Johnson et al, Bi-allelic variants in the non-protein-coding minor spliceosome components RNU6ATAC and RNU4ATAC cause syndromic monogenic autoimmune diabetes, The American Journal of Human Genetics (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2026.02.017
Wildlife trade increases pathogen transmission: What 40 years of data say about spillover
Analysis of 40 years of wildlife trade data shows that traded wild mammals are 1.5 times more likely to share pathogens with humans than non-traded species, with risk increasing for illegally or live-traded animals. Each decade a species is present in trade adds, on average, one additional shared pathogen. These findings underscore the need for enhanced biosurveillance and reduced wildlife trade to limit zoonotic disease emergence.
Hedgehogs, elephants, pangolins, bears or fennec foxes: many wild species are sold as pets, hunting trophies, for traditional medicine, biomedical research, or for their meat or fur. These practices, whether legal or illegal, concern one-quarter of all mammal species. Now a study quantifies the impact of wildlife trade on the exchange of germs and parasites between animals and humans. The work, titled "Wildlife trade drives animal-to-human pathogen transmission over 40 years," appears in Science.
The team combined forty years of legal and illegal wildlife import-export data with compilations of host–pathogen relationships. Their analyses, led to the following result: Wild mammals that are traded are 1.5 times more likely to share infectious agents with humans than those that are not involved in trade.
In other words, these species have a 50% higher probability of sharing at least one virus, bacterium, fungus or parasite with us. That is not all: the risk is even higher when species are traded illegally or alive (for example as exotic pets).
The most striking finding, according to the research team, is that "the length of time an animal has been present in trade plays a key role: On average, a species shares one additional pathogen with humans for every ten-year period spent on the market.
The results of the study highlight the need to improve biosurveillance of animals and animal-derived products in order to detect infectious agents and assess their potential for transmission to humans.
Jérôme M. W. Gippet, Wildlife trade drives animal-to-human pathogen transmission over 40 years, Science (2026). DOI: 10.1126/science.adw5518. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adw5518
A 1.9 billion-year-old bedrock will soon house the world's first permanent nuclear waste site
Finland's Onkalo facility will be the world's first permanent deep geological repository for spent nuclear fuel, designed to isolate 6,500 tons of radioactive waste in stable bedrock for hundreds of thousands of years. The approach uses copper canisters and bentonite clay to contain radioactivity until it decays to safe levels, but uncertainties remain regarding long-term canister corrosion and future risks. Deep underground storage is considered safer than above-ground alternatives, though challenges persist in ensuring information preservation and minimizing risks to future generations.
CAR-T therapy drives remission in patient with three autoimmune diseases
For the first time, scientists have used a modern cell therapy called CAR-T to treat a patient with three different life-threatening autoimmune diseases that had resisted years of treatment. The patient, who once required daily blood infusions, has been in remission without needing additional treatment for a year since the CAR-T therapy. The case report, published in Med, suggests that CAR-T therapies can help treat complex and severe autoimmune diseases.
After being sick for more than a decade, the patient is now in treatment-free remission and able to return to an almost normal life. This therapy significantly improved her quality of life.
CD19 CAR-T therapy induces remission in refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia with ITP and antiphospholipid syndrome, Med (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2026.101075
Lowering oxygen levels had a clear effect on the limbs of mouse embryos. Under reduced oxygen, mouse cells closed wounds faster and showed signs of entering a regenerative program. Stabilizing HIF1A produced similar effects, even when oxygen levels remained high.
Low oxygen also changed cell behavior, with skin cells becoming more mobile and altering their mechanical properties. Metabolism shifted toward glycolysis, a process that takes place in low-oxygen states. At the same time, chemical marks on DNA-associated proteins shifted to favor the activation of regeneration-related genes.
Frog tadpoles behaved differently. Their limbs regenerated efficiently across a wide range of oxygen levels, including levels well above those normally found in air. Molecular analysis showed that their cells maintain stable HIF1A activity even when oxygen increases, due to low expression of genes that normally shut this pathway down.
By comparing frogs, axolotls, mice, and human datasets, the team found a consistent pattern. Regeneration-competent amphibians show reduced oxygen-sensing capacity, allowing regenerative programs to be initiated and sustained. Mammals show the opposite pattern. Their cells respond strongly to oxygen and switch regenerative programs off soon after injury.
The results suggest that mammalian limbs retain latent regenerative potential at early stages, depending on how cells respond to environmental signals such as oxygen. This means that adjusting oxygen-sensing pathways might one day improve wound healing or regenerative responses in humans.
Species-specific oxygen sensing governs the initiation of vertebrate limb regeneration, Science (2026). DOI: 10.1126/science.adw8526
Part 2
Some animals can regrow lost body parts. Salamanders and frog tadpoles can rebuild entire limbs after amputation. Mammals cannot. For decades, biologists have tried to understand why. Now a research team has discovered that oxygen plays a crucial role in limb regeneration. By comparing amputated limbs from frog tadpoles and embryonic mice, the researchers found that the way cells sense oxygen determines whether regeneration can even begin. The study is published in Science.
Limb regeneration begins with wound healing. After amputation, cells at the injury site must rapidly seal the wound and switch into regenerative cell types. In amphibians, this process runs smoothly. In mammals, it stalls early. Wound closure is slow and scar formation takes over, blocking regeneration.
One key difference lies in the environment. Amphibian larvae develop in water, where oxygen levels are lower than in the air. Moreover, many regeneration-competent species live in aquatic environments. Meanwhile, mammalian tissues are typically exposed to higher oxygen levels after injury.
What is unclear is whether this difference has played a direct role in regeneration or is merely a consequence of lifestyle.
The researchers amputated developing limbs from frog tadpoles and mouse embryos and cultured them outside the body under controlled oxygen conditions. Oxygen levels were lowered to match aquatic environments or raised to levels close to air.
They tracked how cells responded by measuring wound closure, cell movement, gene activity, metabolism, and epigenetic states, including changes to DNA packaging. The work focused on HIF1A, a protein that acts as a cellular oxygen sensor. When oxygen is low, HIF1A becomes stable and activates programs that set the stage for wound healing and regeneration.
© 2026 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Science Simplified! to add comments!