Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
JAI VIGNAN
All about Science - to remove misconceptions and encourage scientific temper
Communicating science to the common people
'To make them see the world differently through the beautiful lense of science'
Members: 22
Latest Activity: 19 hours ago
WE LOVE SCIENCE HERE BECAUSE IT IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING
THIS IS A WAR ZONE WHERE SCIENCE FIGHTS WITH NONSENSE AND WINS
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
"Being a scientist is a state of mind, not a profession!"
"Science, when it's done right, can yield amazing things".
The Reach of Scientific Research From Labs to Laymen
The aim of science is not only to open a door to infinite knowledge and wisdom but to set a limit to infinite error.
"Knowledge is a Superpower but the irony is you cannot get enough of it with ever increasing data base unless you try to keep up with it constantly and in the right way!" The best education comes from learning from people who know what they are exactly talking about.
Science is this glorious adventure into the unknown, the opportunity to discover things that nobody knew before. And that’s just an experience that’s not to be missed. But it’s also a motivated effort to try to help humankind. And maybe that’s just by increasing human knowledge—because that’s a way to make us a nobler species.
If you are scientifically literate the world looks very different to you.
We do science and science communication not because they are easy but because they are difficult!
“Science is not a subject you studied in school. It’s life. We 're brought into existence by it!"
Links to some important articles :
1. Interactive science series...
a. how-to-do-research-and-write-research-papers-part 13
b. Some Qs people asked me on science and my replies to them...
Part 6, part-10, part-11, part-12, part 14 , part- 8,
part- 1, part-2, part-4, part-5, part-16, part-17, part-18 , part-19 , part-20
part-21 , part-22, part-23, part-24, part-25, part-26, part-27 , part-28
part-29, part-30, part-31, part-32, part-33, part-34, part-35, part-36, part-37,
part-38, part-40, part-41, part-42, part-43, part-44, part-45, part-46, part-47
Part 48, part49, Critical thinking -part 50 , part -51, part-52, part-53
part-54, part-55, part-57, part-58, part-59, part-60, part-61, part-62, part-63
part 64, part-65, part-66, part-67, part-68, part 69, part-70 part-71, part-73 ...
.......306
BP variations during pregnancy part-72
who is responsible for the gender of their children - a man or a woman -part-56
c. some-questions-people-asked-me-on-science-based-on-my-art-and-poems -part-7
d. science-s-rules-are-unyielding-they-will-not-be-bent-for-anybody-part-3-
e. debate-between-scientists-and-people-who-practice-and-propagate-pseudo-science - part -9
f. why astrology is pseudo-science part 15
g. How Science is demolishing patriarchal ideas - part-39
2. in-defence-of-mangalyaan-why-even-developing-countries-like-india need space research programmes
3. Science communication series:
a. science-communication - part 1
b. how-scienitsts-should-communicate-with-laymen - part 2
c. main-challenges-of-science-communication-and-how-to-overcome-them - part 3
d. the-importance-of-science-communication-through-art- part 4
e. why-science-communication-is-geting worse - part 5
f. why-science-journalism-is-not-taken-seriously-in-this-part-of-the-world - part 6
g. blogs-the-best-bet-to-communicate-science-by-scientists- part 7
h. why-it-is-difficult-for-scientists-to-debate-controversial-issues - part 8
i. science-writers-and-communicators-where-are-you - part 9
j. shooting-the-messengers-for-a-different-reason-for-conveying-the- part 10
k. why-is-science-journalism-different-from-other-forms-of-journalism - part 11
l. golden-rules-of-science-communication- Part 12
m. science-writers-should-develop-a-broader-view-to-put-things-in-th - part 13
n. an-informed-patient-is-the-most-cooperative-one -part 14
o. the-risks-scientists-will-have-to-face-while-communicating-science - part 15
p. the-most-difficult-part-of-science-communication - part 16
q. clarity-on-who-you-are-writing-for-is-important-before-sitting-to write a science story - part 17
r. science-communicators-get-thick-skinned-to-communicate-science-without-any-bias - part 18
s. is-post-truth-another-name-for-science-communication-failure?
t. why-is-it-difficult-for-scientists-to-have-high-eqs
u. art-and-literature-as-effective-aids-in-science-communication-and teaching
v.* some-qs-people-asked-me-on-science communication-and-my-replies-to-them
** qs-people-asked-me-on-science-and-my-replies-to-them-part-173
w. why-motivated-perception-influences-your-understanding-of-science
x. science-communication-in-uncertain-times
y. sci-com: why-keep-a-dog-and-bark-yourself
z. How to deal with sci com dilemmas?
A+. sci-com-what-makes-a-story-news-worthy-in-science
B+. is-a-perfect-language-important-in-writing-science-stories
C+. sci-com-how-much-entertainment-is-too-much-while-communicating-sc
D+. sci-com-why-can-t-everybody-understand-science-in-the-same-way
E+. how-to-successfully-negotiate-the-science-communication-maze
4. Health related topics:
a. why-antibiotic-resistance-is-increasing-and-how-scientists-are-tr
b. what-might-happen-when-you-take-lots-of-medicines
c. know-your-cesarean-facts-ladies
d. right-facts-about-menstruation
e. answer-to-the-question-why-on-big-c
f. how-scientists-are-identifying-new-preventive-measures-and-cures-
g. what-if-little-creatures-high-jack-your-brain-and-try-to-control-
h. who-knows-better?
k. can-rust-from-old-drinking-water-pipes-cause-health-problems
l. pvc-and-cpvc-pipes-should-not-be-used-for-drinking-water-supply
m. melioidosis
o. desensitization-and-transplant-success-story
p. do-you-think-the-medicines-you-are-taking-are-perfectly-alright-then revisit your position!
q. swine-flu-the-difficlulties-we-still-face-while-tackling-the-outb
r. dump-this-useless-information-into-a-garbage-bin-if-you-really-care about evidence based medicine
s. don-t-ignore-these-head-injuries
u. allergic- agony-caused-by-caterpillars-and-moths
General science:
a.why-do-water-bodies-suddenly-change-colour
b. don-t-knock-down-your-own-life-line
c. the-most-menacing-animal-in-the-world
d. how-exo-planets-are-detected
e. the-importance-of-earth-s-magnetic-field
f. saving-tigers-from-extinction-is-still-a-travail
g. the-importance-of-snakes-in-our-eco-systems
h. understanding-reverse-osmosis
i. the-importance-of-microbiomes
j. crispr-cas9-gene-editing-technique-a-boon-to-fixing-defective-gen
k. biomimicry-a-solution-to-some-of-our-problems
5. the-dilemmas-scientists-face
6. why-we-get-contradictory-reports-in-science
7. be-alert-pseudo-science-and-anti-science-are-on-prowl
8. science-will-answer-your-questions-and-solve-your-problems
9. how-science-debunks-baseless-beliefs
10. climate-science-and-its-relevance
11. the-road-to-a-healthy-life
12. relative-truth-about-gm-crops-and-foods
13. intuition-based-work-is-bad-science
14. how-science-explains-near-death-experiences
15. just-studies-are-different-from-thorough-scientific-research
16. lab-scientists-versus-internet-scientists
17. can-you-challenge-science?
18. the-myth-of-ritual-working
19.science-and-superstitions-how-rational-thinking-can-make-you-work-better
20. comets-are-not-harmful-or-bad-omens-so-enjoy-the-clestial-shows
21. explanation-of-mysterious-lights-during-earthquakes
22. science-can-tell-what-constitutes-the-beauty-of-a-rose
23. what-lessons-can-science-learn-from-tragedies-like-these
24. the-specific-traits-of-a-scientific-mind
25. science-and-the-paranormal
26. are-these-inventions-and-discoveries-really-accidental-and-intuitive like the journalists say?
27. how-the-brain-of-a-polymath-copes-with-all-the-things-it-does
28. how-to-make-scientific-research-in-india-a-success-story
29. getting-rid-of-plastic-the-natural-way
30. why-some-interesting-things-happen-in-nature
31. real-life-stories-that-proves-how-science-helps-you
32. Science and trust series:
a. how-to-trust-science-stories-a-guide-for-common-man
b. trust-in-science-what-makes-people-waver
c. standing-up-for-science-showing-reasons-why-science-should-be-trusted
You will find the entire list of discussions here: http://kkartlab.in/group/some-science/forum
( Please go through the comments section below to find scientific research reports posted on a daily basis and watch videos based on science)
Get interactive...
Please contact us if you want us to add any information or scientific explanation on any topic that interests you. We will try our level best to give you the right information.
Our mail ID: kkartlabin@gmail.com
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa 19 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Day or night, many of us grind or clench our teeth, and don't even realize we're doing it. Here are three …Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa 21 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
I grew up in rural Colorado, deep in the mountains, and I can still remember the first time I visited Denver in the early 2000s. The city sits on the plain, skyscrapers rising and buildings extending far into the distance. Except, as we drove out of…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa yesterday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: You have prepared your food. You've settled to eat. Then an insect crawls onto it. Do you throw your food away?Krishna: How about removing the part on which the insect crawled on and eating the rest of it?I don’t want to waste any food. So I will…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Saturday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: Where is 1 study in the US using record-level data showing that kids who are fully vaccinated die less? According to AI, no such study exists. Why can't anyone show us the studies showing vaccines save lives? Is it all based on beliefs, no…Continue
Comment
Dark matter has remained largely a mystery since it was proposed so many years ago. Up to this point, scientists have only been able to indirectly observe dark matter through its effects on observable matter, such as its ability to generate enough gravitational force to hold galaxies together.
The reason dark matter can't be observed directly is that the particles that make up dark matter don't interact with electromagnetic force—meaning dark matter doesn't absorb, reflect or emit light.
Theories abound, but many researchers hypothesize that dark matter is made up of something called weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs, which are heavier than protons but interact very little with other matter. Despite this lack of interaction, when two WIMPs collide, it is predicted that the two particles will annihilate one another and release other particles, including gamma ray photons.
Researchers have targeted regions where dark matter is concentrated, such as the center of the Milky Way, through astronomical observations for years in search of these specific gamma rays.
Using the latest data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, astronomers think they finally detected the specific gamma rays predicted by the annihilation of theoretical dark matter particles.How cancer cells tolerate missing chromosomes
Cancer cells with missing chromosomes maintain protein balance not by reducing protein degradation, but by selectively increasing synthesis of proteins encoded by the lost chromosome. In contrast, cells with extra chromosomes increase degradation of excess proteins. This adaptive mechanism enables cancer cells to tolerate chromosomal imbalances characteristic of aneuploidy.
Yi Di et al, Divergent proteome tolerance against gain and loss of chromosome arms, Molecular Cell (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.10.023
The measurements reveal that not all immune cells are created equal—with memory T cells living for 1–2 years in most tissues, while those in the spleen can persist for 3–10 years. Tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM cells) were also found to keep their special protective features throughout life, unlike circulating memory T cells in the blood, which show signs of aging and reduced function.
This shows that while circulating memory T cells develop aging markers, TRM cells are shielded from immunosenescence, a process where immune cells become less effective with age. Lastly, both types of memory T cells undergo changes in their DNA (epigenetic changes) as we age, but TRM cells show more gene regulation, helping them adapt and maintain their protective roles.
The discovery that TRM cells remain stable and avoid aging-related decline could help scientists develop better vaccines and treatments for infections, especially in older adults. It also opens new doors to understanding how our immune system adapts to aging, and how we might boost its resilience.
Nora Lam et al, Asynchronous aging and turnover of human circulating and tissue-resident memory T cells across sites, Immunity (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.07.001
Part 2
The big questions the research team sought to answer were: Do these cells last for years, or are they constantly replaced? Do they lose their protective abilities as we get older? And does where they live in the body make a difference?
To tackle these questions, the team analyzed blood and tissue samples from 138 organ donors, ranging in age from 2 to 93 years. Using the isotope measurement capabilities at LLNL's Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (CAMS), Buchholz was able to analyze the samples by employing a cutting-edge technique called "retrospective radiocarbon birth dating," which measures tiny amounts of a carbon isotope (carbon-14) in the DNA of cells.
Accelerator mass spectrometry works by accelerating ions to extraordinarily high kinetic energies, allowing researchers to count individual carbon-14 atoms in a sample. This level of precision is crucial for accurately estimating the age of cells, since the amount of carbon-14 in the atmosphere has changed over the past several decades due to nuclear testing and other factors. By comparing the carbon-14 content in T cell DNA to historical atmospheric levels, the researchers could determine how long these immune cells had been alive in different tissues.
Part 1
Cellular instructions are written in a four-letter language—A, T, C, and G—which string together to form long strands of DNA. These long, unruly stretches of DNA are then spooled around proteins called histones and packaged into chromatin—condensing and organizing the strands for easy storage and access. The epigenome is a layer of tags and modifications made on top of all that. These changes determine which genes are and aren't expressed without altering the base code itself, allowing for flexibility in cellular identity and behavior.
One prominent epigenetic tag is DNA methylation, in which a methyl group is tacked onto specific "C" letters within the DNA code. These DNA methylation tags signal for the underlying DNA to be turned "off"—a process called "silencing." This process is important not only for regulating gene expression, but also for silencing the expression of special genetic elements, called transposons. If expressed, transposons can move within the genome, resulting in genome instability and reduced organismal fitness.
Understanding how, when, and why specific DNA methylation patterns are generated in each cell type is crucial for explaining biological development and treating diseases that involve epigenetic dysfunction.
All the cells in an organism have the exact same genetic sequence. What differs across cell types is their epigenetics—meticulously placed chemical tags that influence which genes are expressed in each cell. Mistakes or failures in epigenetic regulation can lead to severe developmental defects in plants and animals alike. This creates a puzzling question: If epigenetic changes regulate our genetics, what is regulating them?Scientists have now used plant cells to discover that a type of epigenetic tag, called DNA methylation, can be regulated by genetic mechanisms. This new mode of plant DNA methylation targeting uses specific DNA sequences to tell the methylation machinery where to dock. Prior to this study, scientists had understood only how DNA methylation was regulated by other epigenetic features, so the discovery that genetic features can also guide DNA methylation patterns is a major paradigm shift.
These findings could inform future epigenetic engineering strategies aimed at generating methylation patterns predicted to repair or enhance cell function, with many potential applications in medicine and agriculture.
Guanghui Xu et al, Transcription factors instruct DNA methylation patterns in plant reproductive tissues, Nature Cell Biology (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41556-025-01808-5
The study of an assemblage of Neanderthal human bones discovered in the Troisième caverne of Goyet (Belgium) has brought to light selective cannibalistic behavior primarily targeting female adults and children between 41,000 and 45,000 years ago.
The biological profile of the victims, identified for the first time, reveals that they were part of a group originating from outside of the local community, and they were probably brought to the site where to be consumed for food rather than in a ritual context, as suggested by the presence of traces similar to those found on animal bones hunted, butchered and consumed by occupants of the Goyet site.
The research, which has just been published in Scientific Reports, was conducted by an international team of researchers.
Situating these analyses in the context of the late Middle Paleolithic—marked in Northern Europe by great cultural diversity within Neanderthal groups and the emerging presence of Homo sapiens in nearby areas—such cannibalism directed at specific outsiders could reflect the existence of territorial tensions between groups that preceded the disappearance of Neanderthals in the region.
These conclusions are based on ten years of research involving a reassessment of the Goyet collection through DNA analysis, radiocarbon dating, and isotopic measurements to determine the geographic origin of individuals, in addition to virtual reconstitutions enabling morphological analysis of sometimes very fragmentary human bones.
Quentin Cosnefroy et al, Highly selective cannibalism in the Late Pleistocene of Northern Europe reveals Neandertals were targeted prey, Scientific Reports (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-24460-3
Marine animals inevitably eat what we put deliberately or unintentionally in the ocean, including pervasive plastics—but how much is too much?
The bar is low, according to a new study out this week: less than three sugar cubes worth could kill birds like Atlantic puffins, for example.
That threshold "is much smaller than scientists expected".
The paper, published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, saw researchers analyze necropsies from more than 10,000 animals in a bid to model how different types of plastic can affect marine life, and at what point the dose turns lethal.
Scientists pulled the necropsy results from dozens of studies and other databases across the globe, using data in which cause of death and plastic consumption information was known. The animals generally were stranded on beaches or otherwise incidentally caught.
Researchers modeled the relationship between plastics ingested and likelihood of death, according to total pieces consumed as well as the volume eaten relative to the size of the animal's digestive tract.
They also examined how different types of plastic affect different types of animals. Seabirds, for instance, were particularly impacted by rubber and hard plastics.
Just six pieces, each smaller than a pea, were 90% likely to cause death in those birds, according to the study.
Sea turtles faced considerable risk from soft plastics like bags.
Those items were also especially deadly for marine mammals, as was fishing gear.
What is worse is half of the individual animals were from species listed as threatened, vulnerable or endangered.
Murphy, Erin L., A quantitative risk assessment framework for mortality due to macroplastic ingestion in seabirds, marine mammals, and sea turtles, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2415492122. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2415492122
Lab-grown diamond coatings shown to prevent mineral scale in industrial pipes
Lab-grown diamond coatings, particularly those with nitrogen-terminated surfaces, significantly reduce mineral scale formation in industrial pipes by creating a water barrier that inhibits mineral ion attachment. These coatings outperform traditional treatments, are durable, and can be applied cost-effectively, offering broad potential for water and energy systems.
Xiang Zhang et al, Nitrogen-Terminated Diamond Films for Antiscaling Coatings, ACS Nano (2025). DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5c13554
The same technology used in COVID-19 vaccines could help prevent muscle damage from snakebites, according to a study published in Trends in Biotechnology.
Scientists tested whether mRNA technology could be used to protect against the damage caused by the venom of the Bothrops asper snake, found in Central and South America. This snake's venom destroys muscle tissue, often leaving victims with permanent disabilities even after receiving standard treatment.
The research team wrapped specific mRNA molecules in tiny fat particles that, when injected into muscle, teach cells to produce protective antibodies, preventing venom damage. The treatment could significantly limit the injury and impacts caused by snakebites, which kill around 140,000 people worldwide and cause 400,000 permanent disabilities each year.
For the first time, the scientists have shown that mRNA technology can protect muscle tissue from snake venom-induced damage. This opens a completely new door for treating snakebites, particularly the local injuries that current antivenoms struggle to prevent.
Trends in Biotechnology (2025). doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.10.017
Cancer is a common disease among mammals, but some species, such as the naked mole rat and elephants, have evolved resistance. According to new research published in the journal Science Advances, this may be because these animals care for one another and have interdependent social lives.
Cancer is a disease of the cells, primarily caused by uncontrolled cell growth that leads to malignant tumors. The conventional view is that this is a mistake of biology, a byproduct of living long enough to accumulate mutations. However, this latest study turns that on its head by suggesting that higher cancer rates in later life may be an evolved trait that benefits the species even if it comes at the expense of the individual.
Researchers analyzed public databases to look for correlations between cancer risk and how mammals live. They discovered that cancer rates were particularly high in species that generally live alone, fight for resources and raise large litters of young. But in gregarious species that live in groups, are cooperative and caring and raise small litters, the cancer risk was much lower.
"Species with higher intraspecific competition display higher cancer prevalence and mortality risk than gregarious species with cooperative and caring habits, even if they are carnivorous," write the researchers in their research paper.
To explain the difference in cancer risk between solitary and social species, the team developed a mathematical model to test a concept known as the Hydra Effect. This is a counterintuitive phenomenon in which an increase in a species' death rate leads to a rise in its population size. The name comes from the mythological creature that grew two heads for each head it lost.
In this study, the scientists used their model to examine how the death of older, less reproductive individuals would affect the entire group, depending on whether the species was cooperative or competitive.
The model showed that in competitive species, older individuals consumed food and territory without actively reproducing. But when they were removed from the population, it freed up resources, allowing younger animals of reproductive age to reproduce more successfully and the population to grow. In other words, cancer clears out older competitors to make way for the fertile young.
When it comes to cooperative species, the model showed that this cooperation blocks the Hydra Effect. Older animals are important helpers that care for the young and defend the group, so killing them off with cancer would put the survival of the next generation at risk.
If the research is correct and cancer is not just a genetic lottery, understanding the cooperative lifestyles of cancer-resistant mammals could give us new strategies for healthier aging and cancer prevention.
Catalina Sierra et al, Coevolution of cooperative lifestyles and reduced cancer prevalence in mammals, Science Advances (2025). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adw0685
**
© 2026 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Science Simplified! to add comments!