Comment

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 10, 2023 at 8:54am

Scientists set up a field study with four different species of Anolis lizards (anoles) on a small island at the Fairchild Tropical Botanic Gardens in Coral Gables, Florida. They measured natural selection in all four lizard species over five consecutive time periods by catching and monitoring the survival of every lizard on the island.

The researchers searched day and night for lizards. Using long fishing poles with tiny lassos at their tips, they gently captured them by their strong necks, placed them in coolers, and documented the exact branch or stump where they found each lizard.

Back in the lab, they measured the lizards' heads, legs, feet, weight, and even the stickiness of their toes. After assigning an identifying number to each lizard and marking them with a tiny tag under the skin, the team released the lizards to the same branches where they'd found them. They went out in the following days and weeks to catch the rest of them.

Every six months for three years, the researchers started the process over again. Catching the same lizards, taking measurements, releasing them, and making notes of which lizards survived and which didn't.

By incorporating data for each time period, they captured the history of every lizard in the community. They then related survival data to the variation in body traits, which allowed him to analyze which body traits were important predictors of survival. Taken together, the analysis painted a picture of how natural selection operated on the community as a whole.

To his surprise, scientists found that the stabilizing form of natural selection—that which maintains a species' same, average features—was extremely rare. In fact, natural selection varied massively through time. Some years, lizards with longer legs would survive better, and other years, lizards with shorter legs fared better. For other times, there was no clear pattern at all.

The most fascinating result is that natural selection was extremely variable through time,"  the scientists said. "We often saw that selection would completely flip in direction from one year to the next. When combined into a long-term pattern, however, all this variation effectively canceled itself out: Species remained remarkably similar across the entire time period."

There had never been such insight into how selection works on a community level, and certainly not at this level of detail.

"Evolution can and does happen—it's this ongoing process, but it doesn't necessarily mean things are constantly changing in the long run," the scientists said. "Now we know that even if animals appear to be staying the same, evolution is still happening."

Understanding evolution doesn't only help us understand the plants and animals around us and how they're distributed across the world," they said. "It also shows us how life sustains itself in a world dominated by humans."

Part 2

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 10, 2023 at 8:48am

Study challenges the rules of evolutionary biology

Charles Darwin said that evolution was constantly happening, causing animals to adapt for survival. But many of his contemporaries disagreed. If evolution is always causing things to change, they asked, then how is it that two fossils from the same species, found in the same location, can look identical despite being 50 million years apart in age?

Everything changed in the past 40 years, when an explosion of evolutionary studies proved that evolution can and does occur rapidly—even from one generation to the next. Evolutionary biologists were thrilled, but the findings reinforced the same paradox: If evolution can happen so fast, then why do most species on Earth continue to appear the same for many millions of years?

This is known as the paradox of stasis and researchers set out to investigate it. 

  They conducted a long-term study in a community of lizards, measuring how evolution unfolds in the wild across multiple species. In doing so, he may have found the answer to one of evolution's greatest challenges.

The research was published as the cover story in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Scientists call this a paradox because it doesn't seem to make any sense. The most common explanation is that natural selection  is working to stabilize a species' appearance, with the assumption that an average form will help them survive the best. The problem is, when people do field studies, they almost never find that this kind of 'stabilizing' selection actually exists

Part 1

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 10, 2023 at 8:30am

The team tested interactions across a broad panel of 20 human and mouse cancer cell lines, ranging from Jurkat leukemia to metastatic human fibrosarcoma cells, triple-negative breast cancer and glioblastoma brain-tumor-initiating cell lines. Consistent potent cytotoxic activity was observed across the entire panel of cancer cell lines that were evaluated with portimine A. The fully synthetic portimine B was found to be substantially less effective.

Portimine A was identified as a potent inducer of apoptosis in various cancer cell lines, including MC38 cells, a colorectal carcinoma testing model. The apoptosis caused by portimine A had minimal effects on non-cancerous cells and low toxicity in mice.
Specifically, portimine A was found to target the 60S ribosomal export protein NMD3, blocking polysome formation and inhibiting protein translation and was observed to be an effective agent for suppressing tumor growth in vivo.

The exposure time to portimine A was limited by its half-life of around 30 minutes. The short duration still resulted in a significant reduction in tumor growth, indicating a very potent activity and potential therapeutic uses in the future.

Junchen Tang et al, Synthesis of portimines reveals the basis of their anti-cancer activity, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06535-1

The chemical synthesis and anti-cancer properties of portimines, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-02788-y

Part 2

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 10, 2023 at 8:29am

How synthesized plankton molecules inhibit cancer proteins

Researchers have discovered how to harness the toxic power of plankton to manufacture anti-cancer molecules.

In a paper, "Synthesis of portimines reveals the basis of their anti-cancer activity," published in Nature, the team details the steps taken in synthesizing marine toxins, portimine A and portimine B, enabling in-depth investigations into their properties

Dinoflagellate-derived cyclic imine toxins, specifically portimine A and portimine B, are of interest due to their potential anti-cancer therapeutic properties. Previous research has shown the effects of cyclic imine toxins on cancer cells, but the molecular mechanisms underlying the cause of the anti-cancer activity were unknown. Access to these toxins in large quantities is currently hard to come by as the only known producer is a type of tiny marine plankton, Vulcanodinium rugosum. To test the toxin's activity, the researchers first needed to innovate a way to synthesize large enough quantities to work with.

The synthesis began with constructing a minimally-decorated carbon skeleton devoid of most oxygen atoms. The idea was to leverage a macrocycle's innate reactivity to install the correct oxygenation pattern and stereochemistry.

Strategic ring-chain tautomerization events were employed to facilitate the synthesis using ring-closing alkyne metathesis to construct the 14-membered macrocycle in the portimines' skeleton. The innovation represents a scalable and concise synthesis of portimines. With the desired molecules created, the next step was to see how they interacted with cancer cells.

Part 1

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 10, 2023 at 8:06am

Digital watermark protections can be easily bypassed

Perhaps the most chilling aspect of AI is its capacity to generate deepfake images.

But recent developments portend a more unsettling trend as digital fakery turns malicious. Not only celebrities and politicians, ordinary citizens are targeted, too. People's faces are appearing in images on social media without their consent. 

Major digital media companies—OpenAI, Alphabet, Amazon, DeepMind—have promised to develop tools to combat disinformation. One key approach is the use of watermarking on AI-generated content.

A paper published Sept. 29 on the preprint server arXiv raises troubling news about the ability to curb such digital abuse.

Researchers ran tests demonstrating easy run-arounds of protective watermarks.

We don't have any reliable watermarking at this point because the researchers broke them all!

The team used a process called diffusion purification, which applies Gaussian noise to a watermark and then removes it. It leaves a distorted watermark that can bypass detection algorithms. The rest of the image is only minimally altered.

They further successfully demonstrated that bad actors with access to black-box watermarking algorithms could foist fake photos with markings that trick detectors into believing they are legitimate.

Better algorithms will certainly come along. As has been the case with viral attacks, the bad guys will always be working to break whatever defenses the good guys come up with, and the cat-and-mouse game will continue.

Mehrdad Saberi et al, Robustness of AI-Image Detectors: Fundamental Limits and Practical Attacks, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2310.00076

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 8, 2023 at 12:38pm

The researchers think that gene mutations in certain individuals means that BPA can't be cleared as well as it needs to be, which means the substance sticks around in the body. That potentially could cause damage in terms of neuron development and operation.

Conditions like ASD and ADHD are thought to be brought on by a combination of genetic and environmental influences, and this new study brings together both of them. However, it's only part of the story – not every child with a neurodevelopmental disorder had problems flushing out BPA, so there are other factors at play, too.

Work is continuing to identify how exactly ASD and ADHD take hold in the body – whether it's in utero before birth for example, or later on in life – as the data isn't enough to show whether BPA exposure causes either disorder.

"There is an extensive body of epidemiological evidence for a relationship between neurodevelopmental disorders and environmental pollutants such as plasticizers," write the researchers.

"How important plasticizer originated neurodevelopmental disorder is in the overall occurrence of these disorders is not known, but it must account for a significant proportion or would not have been so easy to detect in a metabolic study of moderate size such as this study."

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0...

Part 2

**

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 8, 2023 at 12:38pm

Common Plastic Additive Linked to Autism And ADHD

The number of kids being diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD) has risen sharply in recent decades, and a new study points to the common plastic additive bisphenol A (BPA) as a potential reason why. BPA is used in a lot of plastics and plastic production processes, and can also be found inside food and drink cans. However, previous research has also linked it to health issues involving hormone disruption, including breast cancer and infertility.

In this new study, researchers from Rowan University and Rutgers University in the US looked at three groups of children: 66 with autism, 46 with ADHD, and 37 neurotypical kids. In particular, they analyzed the process of glucuronidation, a chemical process the body uses to clear out toxins within the blood through urine.
The research found that kids with ASD and ADHD couldn't clear out BPA and another similar compound called Diethylhexyl Phthalate (DEHP) with as much efficiency as other kids, potentially leading to longer exposure to their toxic effects.

"Detoxification of these two plasticizers is compromised in children with ASD and ADHD," write the researchers in their published paper. "Consequently, their tissues are more exposed to these two plasticizers."

It was only in the case of BPA that the difference was statistically significant though: the efficiency was reduced by about 11 percent for kids with ASD and 17 percent for kids with ADHD, compared with the control group of children.
Part 1

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 8, 2023 at 12:26pm

Armed with shotgun microphones, researchers recorded the calls of hundreds of individuals, collecting over 5000 vocalizations in total, making it the largest study of individually-marked wild parrots to date. Importantly, they re-recorded the same individuals over two years, which revealed how stable the calls were over time.

They then used a set of models to detect how recognizable individuals were within each of the five main call types given by this species. Surprisingly, they found high variability in the so-called "contact call" that birds use to broadcast their identity. This overturned a long-held assumption that contact calls contain a stable individual signal—and suggested that the parakeets are using something else for individual recognition.
To test if voice prints were at play, scientists turned to a machine learning model widely used in human voice recognition, which detects the identity of the speaker using the timber of their voice. They trained the model to recognize calls of individual parrots that were classed as "tonal" in sound.
Once the model was trained on an individual, they then tested to see if the model could detect the same individual from a different set of calls that were classed as "growling" in sound. The model was able to do this three times better than expected by chance, providing evidence that monk parakeets have a voice print, which could allow individuals to recognize each other no matter what they say.

The researchers, however,  caution that the evidence is still preliminary. Before we can speak of a true voice print, we need to confirm that the model can repeat this result when it is trained with more data from more individuals, and that birds can also recognize this timbre in the vocalizations.

Simeon Smeele et al, Evidence for vocal signatures and voice-prints in a wild parrot, Royal Society Open Science (2023). DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230835. royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.230835

**

Part 2

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 8, 2023 at 12:23pm

Unique voice prints in parrots could help birds be recognized in a flock, no matter what they say

Parrots are exceptional talkers. They can learn new sounds during their entire lives, amassing an almost unlimited vocal repertoire. At the same time, parrots produce calls so they can be individually recognized by members of their flock—raising the question of how their calls can be very variable while also uniquely identifiable.

A study on monk parakeets might have the answer: individuals have a unique tone of voice, known as a voice print, similar to that in humans. This finding in a wild parrot raises the possibility that a voice print might also be present in other vocally flexible species, such as dolphins and bats.

It makes sense for monk parakeets to have an underlying voice print. It's an elegant solution for a bird that dynamically changes its calls but still needs to be known in a very noisy flock.

Humans have complex and flexible vocal repertoires, but we can still recognize each other by voice alone. This is because humans have a voice print: our vocal tract leaves a unique signature in the tone of our voice across everything that we say.

Other social animals also use vocal cues to be recognized. In birds, bats, and dolphins, for example, individuals have a unique "signature call" that makes them identifiable to members of the group. But signature calls encode identity in only one call type. To date, almost no evidence exists for animals having unique signatures that underlie all calls made by an individual. In other words, almost no animals are known to have a voice print.

Like humans, parrots use their tongue and mouth to modulate calls, meaning that their grunts and shrieks sound much more human than a songbird's clean whistle.

Also, like humans, parrots live in large groups with fluid membership. There could be tens of birds vocalizing at the same time. They need a way of keeping track of which individual is making what sound.

Part 1

Comment by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on October 7, 2023 at 11:10am

How do our brains tell us when something goes wrong?

Whether improperly closing a door or shanking a kick in soccer, our brains tell us when we've made a mistake because these sounds differ from what we expect to hear. While it's long been established that our neurons spot these errors, it has been unclear whether there are brain cells that have only one job—to signal when a sound is unexpected or "off."

A team of neuroscientists has now identified a class of neurons—what it calls "prediction-error neurons"—that are not responsive to sounds in general, but only respond when sounds violate expectations, thereby sending a message that a mistake has been made.

Brains are remarkable at detecting what's happening in the world, but they are even better at telling you whether what happened was expected or not. It 's found that there are specific neurons in the brain that don't tell you what happened, but instead tell you what went wrong. Neurons like these might be vital in learning how to speak or how to play a musical instrument. Both of those behaviors involve lots of trial and error, lots of mistakes, and lots of learning from mistakes

Nicholas J. Audette et al, Stimulus-specific prediction error neurons in mouse auditory cortex, The Journal of Neuroscience (2023). DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0512-23.2023

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 255
• 256
• 257
• 258
• 259
• …
• 1006
• Next ›
• Page