Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
JAI VIGNAN
All about Science - to remove misconceptions and encourage scientific temper
Communicating science to the common people
'To make them see the world differently through the beautiful lense of science'
Members: 22
Latest Activity: 19 hours ago
WE LOVE SCIENCE HERE BECAUSE IT IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING
THIS IS A WAR ZONE WHERE SCIENCE FIGHTS WITH NONSENSE AND WINS
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
"Being a scientist is a state of mind, not a profession!"
"Science, when it's done right, can yield amazing things".
The Reach of Scientific Research From Labs to Laymen
The aim of science is not only to open a door to infinite knowledge and wisdom but to set a limit to infinite error.
"Knowledge is a Superpower but the irony is you cannot get enough of it with ever increasing data base unless you try to keep up with it constantly and in the right way!" The best education comes from learning from people who know what they are exactly talking about.
Science is this glorious adventure into the unknown, the opportunity to discover things that nobody knew before. And that’s just an experience that’s not to be missed. But it’s also a motivated effort to try to help humankind. And maybe that’s just by increasing human knowledge—because that’s a way to make us a nobler species.
If you are scientifically literate the world looks very different to you.
We do science and science communication not because they are easy but because they are difficult!
“Science is not a subject you studied in school. It’s life. We 're brought into existence by it!"
Links to some important articles :
1. Interactive science series...
a. how-to-do-research-and-write-research-papers-part 13
b. Some Qs people asked me on science and my replies to them...
Part 6, part-10, part-11, part-12, part 14 , part- 8,
part- 1, part-2, part-4, part-5, part-16, part-17, part-18 , part-19 , part-20
part-21 , part-22, part-23, part-24, part-25, part-26, part-27 , part-28
part-29, part-30, part-31, part-32, part-33, part-34, part-35, part-36, part-37,
part-38, part-40, part-41, part-42, part-43, part-44, part-45, part-46, part-47
Part 48, part49, Critical thinking -part 50 , part -51, part-52, part-53
part-54, part-55, part-57, part-58, part-59, part-60, part-61, part-62, part-63
part 64, part-65, part-66, part-67, part-68, part 69, part-70 part-71, part-73 ...
.......306
BP variations during pregnancy part-72
who is responsible for the gender of their children - a man or a woman -part-56
c. some-questions-people-asked-me-on-science-based-on-my-art-and-poems -part-7
d. science-s-rules-are-unyielding-they-will-not-be-bent-for-anybody-part-3-
e. debate-between-scientists-and-people-who-practice-and-propagate-pseudo-science - part -9
f. why astrology is pseudo-science part 15
g. How Science is demolishing patriarchal ideas - part-39
2. in-defence-of-mangalyaan-why-even-developing-countries-like-india need space research programmes
3. Science communication series:
a. science-communication - part 1
b. how-scienitsts-should-communicate-with-laymen - part 2
c. main-challenges-of-science-communication-and-how-to-overcome-them - part 3
d. the-importance-of-science-communication-through-art- part 4
e. why-science-communication-is-geting worse - part 5
f. why-science-journalism-is-not-taken-seriously-in-this-part-of-the-world - part 6
g. blogs-the-best-bet-to-communicate-science-by-scientists- part 7
h. why-it-is-difficult-for-scientists-to-debate-controversial-issues - part 8
i. science-writers-and-communicators-where-are-you - part 9
j. shooting-the-messengers-for-a-different-reason-for-conveying-the- part 10
k. why-is-science-journalism-different-from-other-forms-of-journalism - part 11
l. golden-rules-of-science-communication- Part 12
m. science-writers-should-develop-a-broader-view-to-put-things-in-th - part 13
n. an-informed-patient-is-the-most-cooperative-one -part 14
o. the-risks-scientists-will-have-to-face-while-communicating-science - part 15
p. the-most-difficult-part-of-science-communication - part 16
q. clarity-on-who-you-are-writing-for-is-important-before-sitting-to write a science story - part 17
r. science-communicators-get-thick-skinned-to-communicate-science-without-any-bias - part 18
s. is-post-truth-another-name-for-science-communication-failure?
t. why-is-it-difficult-for-scientists-to-have-high-eqs
u. art-and-literature-as-effective-aids-in-science-communication-and teaching
v.* some-qs-people-asked-me-on-science communication-and-my-replies-to-them
** qs-people-asked-me-on-science-and-my-replies-to-them-part-173
w. why-motivated-perception-influences-your-understanding-of-science
x. science-communication-in-uncertain-times
y. sci-com: why-keep-a-dog-and-bark-yourself
z. How to deal with sci com dilemmas?
A+. sci-com-what-makes-a-story-news-worthy-in-science
B+. is-a-perfect-language-important-in-writing-science-stories
C+. sci-com-how-much-entertainment-is-too-much-while-communicating-sc
D+. sci-com-why-can-t-everybody-understand-science-in-the-same-way
E+. how-to-successfully-negotiate-the-science-communication-maze
4. Health related topics:
a. why-antibiotic-resistance-is-increasing-and-how-scientists-are-tr
b. what-might-happen-when-you-take-lots-of-medicines
c. know-your-cesarean-facts-ladies
d. right-facts-about-menstruation
e. answer-to-the-question-why-on-big-c
f. how-scientists-are-identifying-new-preventive-measures-and-cures-
g. what-if-little-creatures-high-jack-your-brain-and-try-to-control-
h. who-knows-better?
k. can-rust-from-old-drinking-water-pipes-cause-health-problems
l. pvc-and-cpvc-pipes-should-not-be-used-for-drinking-water-supply
m. melioidosis
o. desensitization-and-transplant-success-story
p. do-you-think-the-medicines-you-are-taking-are-perfectly-alright-then revisit your position!
q. swine-flu-the-difficlulties-we-still-face-while-tackling-the-outb
r. dump-this-useless-information-into-a-garbage-bin-if-you-really-care about evidence based medicine
s. don-t-ignore-these-head-injuries
u. allergic- agony-caused-by-caterpillars-and-moths
General science:
a.why-do-water-bodies-suddenly-change-colour
b. don-t-knock-down-your-own-life-line
c. the-most-menacing-animal-in-the-world
d. how-exo-planets-are-detected
e. the-importance-of-earth-s-magnetic-field
f. saving-tigers-from-extinction-is-still-a-travail
g. the-importance-of-snakes-in-our-eco-systems
h. understanding-reverse-osmosis
i. the-importance-of-microbiomes
j. crispr-cas9-gene-editing-technique-a-boon-to-fixing-defective-gen
k. biomimicry-a-solution-to-some-of-our-problems
5. the-dilemmas-scientists-face
6. why-we-get-contradictory-reports-in-science
7. be-alert-pseudo-science-and-anti-science-are-on-prowl
8. science-will-answer-your-questions-and-solve-your-problems
9. how-science-debunks-baseless-beliefs
10. climate-science-and-its-relevance
11. the-road-to-a-healthy-life
12. relative-truth-about-gm-crops-and-foods
13. intuition-based-work-is-bad-science
14. how-science-explains-near-death-experiences
15. just-studies-are-different-from-thorough-scientific-research
16. lab-scientists-versus-internet-scientists
17. can-you-challenge-science?
18. the-myth-of-ritual-working
19.science-and-superstitions-how-rational-thinking-can-make-you-work-better
20. comets-are-not-harmful-or-bad-omens-so-enjoy-the-clestial-shows
21. explanation-of-mysterious-lights-during-earthquakes
22. science-can-tell-what-constitutes-the-beauty-of-a-rose
23. what-lessons-can-science-learn-from-tragedies-like-these
24. the-specific-traits-of-a-scientific-mind
25. science-and-the-paranormal
26. are-these-inventions-and-discoveries-really-accidental-and-intuitive like the journalists say?
27. how-the-brain-of-a-polymath-copes-with-all-the-things-it-does
28. how-to-make-scientific-research-in-india-a-success-story
29. getting-rid-of-plastic-the-natural-way
30. why-some-interesting-things-happen-in-nature
31. real-life-stories-that-proves-how-science-helps-you
32. Science and trust series:
a. how-to-trust-science-stories-a-guide-for-common-man
b. trust-in-science-what-makes-people-waver
c. standing-up-for-science-showing-reasons-why-science-should-be-trusted
You will find the entire list of discussions here: http://kkartlab.in/group/some-science/forum
( Please go through the comments section below to find scientific research reports posted on a daily basis and watch videos based on science)
Get interactive...
Please contact us if you want us to add any information or scientific explanation on any topic that interests you. We will try our level best to give you the right information.
Our mail ID: kkartlabin@gmail.com
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa 19 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
You've just cleaned your teeth, you're feeling minty fresh and ready to climb into bed. You take a sip of water, but the water is icy cold, and your next breath feels cool and crisp.What has the…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Monday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: Why do some species go extinct without significant evolutionary changes, even though they're part of the evolutionary process? Krishna:…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa Jan 2. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: Why is Charles Darwin not considered one of the greatest scientists of all time, despite his contributions to science being greater than those of Galileo and Isaac Newton combined?Krishna:That is because of media hype. Media makes someone greater…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa Jan 1. 1 Reply 0 Likes
You're reading a report and trying to concentrate. The room is silent. But despite your best efforts to focus, a little snatch of melody – an "earworm" – keeps circling inside your head.Research suggests most people get earworms regularly – and…Continue
Comment
Vitamin C may help protect fertility from a harmful environmental chemical
Exposure to potassium perchlorate impairs sperm production and damages testes in a fish model, indicating potential reproductive risks. Co-administration of vitamin C reduces this damage and improves fertility, likely by counteracting oxidative stress. These results suggest vitamin C may help protect reproductive health from certain environmental contaminants.
Sourav Chakraborty et al, Vitamin C Mitigates Potassium Perchlorate Exposure-Induced Disruption of Spermatogenesis in Medaka, Environmental Science & Technology (2025). DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5c09514
A pigment that makes feathers and hair orange helps prevent cellular damage by removing excess cysteine from cells. Pheomelanin is an orange-to-red pigment that is built with the amino acid cysteine and found in human red hair and fair skin, as well as in bird feathers. Previous research has shown that pheomelanin is associated with increased melanoma risk, raising questions about why evolution has maintained genetic variants that promote pheomelanin production.
Published in PNAS Nexus, researchers studied 65 adult zebra finches divided into treatment and control groups. In the treatment group, male zebra finches received dietary cysteine and ML349, a drug that blocks pheomelanin synthesis.
Male birds treated with both cysteine and ML349 showed increased oxidative damage in blood plasma compared to males receiving only cysteine, when the authors controlled for overall expression of the regulator of antioxidants by melanocytes. Female birds, which do not produce pheomelanin, tended to show increased oxidative damage when treated with cysteine alone as compared to female controls.
According to the authors, pheomelanin synthesis helps maintain cysteine homeostasis by converting excess cysteine into inert pigment, which may explain why pheomelanin-promoting genetic variants persist despite being associated with increased melanoma risk.
Ismael Galván et al, MC1R depalmitoylation inhibition reveals a physiological role for pheomelanin, PNAS Nexus (2026). DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf391
In nature we usually see that one process is favoured over many. Why is this?
It's true, but in biological systems, catalysis often intervenes—the action of facilitating molecules, enzymes—which accelerate reactions and make them less costly, achieving the same effect as having multiple pathways in parallel. This evolutionary choice happens because maintaining many pathways can have other drawbacks, such as producing many potentially toxic molecules.
Thermodynamic ranking of pathways in reaction networks, Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment (2025). DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/ae22eb.
Part 3
**
Yet from the viewpoint of classical mechanics, compartmentalization and reaction selection—the "constraints" imposed at a system's boundaries—should have no cost at all, as they are treated as fixed external conditions that do not contribute to entropy production.
Researchers now developed a method to calculate these overlooked costs to rank the pathways. This allows researchers to assess their biological efficiency—valuable information for evolutionary studies exploring how life emerged on our planet.
devised a general method to estimate the thermodynamic costs of metabolic processes systematically. In their framework, the cell is imagined as a system crossed by a constant flow, where, for instance, one molecule (a nutrient) enters and another (a product or waste) exits.
Given the underlying chemistry, one can generate all chemically possible pathways that convert the input into the output. Each pathway has its own "thermodynamic cost." Instead of calculating energy in the classical sense, the method estimates how improbable it would be—in a world driven solely by spontaneous chemistry—to see the network (the set of molecules and reactions that convert input to output) behave in exactly that way.
This improbability has two components. The first is the maintenance cost, meaning how unlikely it is to sustain a constant flow through a certain pathway. The second is the restriction cost, which measures how unlikely it is to block all the alternative reactions in the network while keeping only the pathway of interest active.
The calculated improbability represents the cost of that process, which can then be used to classify metabolic pathways according to how "expensive" it is for the cell to keep one pathway active and silence the others.
Part 2
The (metabolic) 'cost of life': New method quantifies hidden energy costs of maintaining metabolic pathways
A new thermodynamic framework quantifies the hidden energetic costs required to maintain specific metabolic pathways and suppress alternatives, beyond direct metabolic energy use. This method ranks pathways by their maintenance and restriction costs, revealing that nature often selects the least dissipative routes, providing insights into the evolution and selection of metabolic processes.
There are "costs of life" that mechanical physics cannot calculate. A clear example is the energy required to keep specific biochemical processes active—such as those that make up photosynthesis, although the examples are countless—while preventing alternative processes from occurring.
In mechanics, no displacement implies zero work, and, put simply, there is no energetic cost for keeping things from happening. Yet careful stochastic thermodynamic calculations show that these costs do exist—and they are often quite significant.
A paper published in the Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment (JSTAT) proposes a way to calculate these costs from a thermodynamic perspective and thus to offer a new tool for understanding the selection and evolution of metabolic pathways at the root of life.
When, in an ancient ocean, a handful of organic molecules formed an external boundary—the first cell membrane—a sharp distinction between an inside and an outside appeared for the first time.
From that moment on, that primordial system had to invest energy to maintain this compartmentalization and to select, among the many chemical reactions that could occur, only a few metabolic pathways capable of exploiting valuable substances taken from the "outside" and transforming them into new products. Life was born together with this effort of compartmentalization and choice.
Metabolic processes have a direct energetic cost, but they also require an "extra cost" to keep steering chemical flows into a preferred pathway rather than letting them disperse into all physically possible alternatives.
Part 1
Cohort groups included 13,957 children conceived via assisted reproductive technology and 55,828 children conceived naturally after 1:4 matching by maternal age, neonatal sex, and birth month.
Asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis were analyzed and reported individually, allowing a child to receive one, two, or all three diagnoses during follow-up. Mean follow-up for asthma measured 7.99 years in the assisted reproductive technology group and 8.41 years in the control group, with allergic rhinitis at 5.79 and 6.34 years, and atopic dermatitis at 7.34 and 7.62 years.
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection use showed no statistically significant differences in risk estimates across the three outcomes. Adjusted hazard ratios measured 1.04 for asthma, 0.99 for allergic rhinitis, and 1.04 for atopic dermatitis.
Fresh embryo transfer carried a higher allergic rhinitis risk than frozen embryo transfer, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.12. Asthma showed no statistically significant difference between fresh and frozen embryo transfer, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.96, and atopic dermatitis showed no statistically significant difference, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01.
Interaction testing showed no statistically significant interaction between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo type for asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopic dermatitis.
Researchers conclude that children conceived via assisted reproductive technology had a higher risk of developing asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopic dermatitis than children conceived naturally. Findings supported an association between assisted reproductive technology conception and later atopic disease development across the outcomes evaluated.
Yao-Chi Hsieh et al, Atopic Disease Development in Offspring Conceived via Assisted Reproductive Technology, JAMA Network Open (2025). DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.51690
Part 2
Researchers report higher risks of atopic disease among children conceived via assisted reproductive technology compared to those conceived naturally.
Assisted reproductive technology use has increased, with estimates placing assisted reproductive technology at 1% to 4% of births, especially in high-income societies, alongside wider use of embryo transfer.
Atopic disease covers three conditions; asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis. Atopic diseases are believed to be influenced by genetic factors and environmental triggers, with developmental origins of health and disease theory proposing that fetal-stage factors can program changes in organ and tissue structure and function.
In the study, "Atopic Disease Development in Offspring Conceived via Assisted Reproductive Technology," published in JAMA Network Open, researchers conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort analysis to investigate whether conception via assisted reproductive technology was associated with atopic disease development in offspring.
Data came from a pool of 23.5 million people in Taiwan through Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, Assisted Reproduction Database, and the Maternal and Child Health Database.
Assisted reproductive technology included procedures such as in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intrafallopian transfer, zygote intrafallopian transfer, and tubal embryo transfer.
Part 1
Tumor bacteria linked to immunotherapy resistance in head and neck cancer
Researchers have discovered that bacteria inside cancerous tumors may be key to understanding why immunotherapy works for some patients but not others.
Elevated bacterial levels within head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors suppress immune responses and contribute to resistance against immunotherapy. These bacteria attract neutrophils, which can inhibit the immune activity required for effective treatment. Reducing tumor bacteria with antibiotics may enhance immunotherapy efficacy, suggesting new avenues for patient selection and targeted interventions.
These studies shift the focus of immunotherapy resistance research beyond tumor genetics to unexpected factors like the tumor microbiome.
By identifying bacteria as a key barrier to treatment, we're opening the door to new strategies for patient selection and targeted antibiotic therapies, potentially improving outcomes for those who don't benefit from immunotherapy, the researchers say.
The research confirmed that patients with high tumor bacteria levels had poorer outcomes with immunotherapy compared to standard chemoradiotherapy.
Together, the two studies showed that elevated bacteria levels in tumors attract neutrophils, white blood cells that fight infection. While neutrophils are essential for combating bacterial infections, in cancer they can suppress the immune system needed for immunotherapy to work effectively.
These findings lay the foundation for future research on why bacteria are attracted to tumors and how to modify them to improve treatment.
1. Tumor ecosystem and microbiome features associated with efficacy and resistance to avelumab plus chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer, Nature Cancer (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s43018-025-01068-0
2. Nature Cancer (2025). www.nature.com/articles/s43018-025-01067-1
Two 'survival modes' and why they matter
The researchers identified two archetypes of growth arrest that can both lead to persistence, but for very different reasons:
Regulated growth arrest: a protected dormant state. In this mode, bacteria intentionally slow down and enter a stable, defended condition. These cells are harder to kill because many antibiotics rely on bacterial growth to be effective.
Disrupted growth arrest: survival through breakdown. In the second mode, bacteria enter a dysregulated and disrupted state. This is not a planned shutdown, but a loss of normal cellular control. These bacteria show a broad impairment in membrane homeostasis, a core function needed to maintain the integrity of the cell. That weakness could become a key treatment target.
Antibiotic persistence plays a role in recurring infections across a wide range of settings, from chronic urinary tract infections to infections tied to medical implants. Yet despite intense research, scientists have struggled to agree on a single mechanism explaining why persister cells survive. Different experiments have produced conflicting results about what persisters look like and how they behave.
This study offers an explanation: researchers may have been observing different types of growth-arrested bacteria without recognizing they were distinct.
By separating persistence into two different physiological states, the findings suggest a future where treatments could be tailored, targeting dormant persisters one way, and disrupted persisters another.
How the researchers saw what others missed
The team combined mathematical modeling with several high-resolution experimental tools, including:
Transcriptomics, to measure how bacterial gene expression shifts under stress
Microcalorimetry, to track metabolic changes through tiny heat signals
Microfluidics, allowing scientists to observe single bacterial cells under controlled conditions
Together, these approaches revealed clear biological signatures distinguishing regulated growth arrest from disrupted growth arrest, along with the specific vulnerabilities of the disrupted state.
Adi Rotem et al, Differentiation between regulated and disrupted growth-arrests allows tailoring of effective treatments for antibiotic persistence, Science Advances (2026). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adt6577. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adt6577
Part 2
Bacteria reveal second 'shutdown mode' for surviving antibiotic treatment
Bacteria can survive antibiotic treatment through two distinct growth-arrest states: a regulated, protective dormancy and a disrupted, dysregulated arrest marked by impaired membrane stability. This duality explains conflicting observations of antibiotic persistence and suggests that targeting each state differently could improve treatment effectiveness and reduce infection relapse.
A new study reveals that bacteria can survive antibiotic treatment through two fundamentally different "shutdown modes," not just the classic idea of dormancy. The paper is published in the journal Science Advances.
The researchers show that some cells enter a regulated, protective growth arrest, a controlled dormant state that shields them from antibiotics, while others survive in a disrupted, dysregulated growth arrest, a malfunctioning state marked by vulnerabilities, especially impaired cell membrane stability. This distinction is important because antibiotic persistence is a major cause of treatment failure and relapsing infections even when bacteria are not genetically resistant, and it has remained scientifically confusing for years, with studies reporting conflicting results.
By demonstrating that persistence can come from two distinct biological states, the work helps explain those contradictions and provides a practical path forward: different persister types may require different treatment strategies, making it possible to design more effective therapies that prevent infections from coming back.
For years, persistence has largely been blamed on bacteria that shut down and lie dormant, essentially going into a kind of sleep that protects them from antibiotics designed to target active growth. But new research reveals that this explanation tells only part of the story.
The study shows that high survival under antibiotics can originate from two fundamentally different growth-arrest states, and they are not just variations of the same "sleeping" behavior. One is a controlled, regulated shutdown, the classic dormancy model. The other is something entirely different: a disrupted, dysregulated arrest, where bacteria survive not by protective calm but by entering a malfunctioning state with distinct vulnerabilities.
Part 1
© 2026 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Science Simplified! to add comments!