Science, Art, Litt, Science based Art & Science Communication
JAI VIGNAN
All about Science - to remove misconceptions and encourage scientific temper
Communicating science to the common people
'To make them see the world differently through the beautiful lense of science'
Members: 22
Latest Activity: 15 hours ago
WE LOVE SCIENCE HERE BECAUSE IT IS A MANY SPLENDOURED THING
THIS IS A WAR ZONE WHERE SCIENCE FIGHTS WITH NONSENSE AND WINS
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
"Being a scientist is a state of mind, not a profession!"
"Science, when it's done right, can yield amazing things".
The Reach of Scientific Research From Labs to Laymen
The aim of science is not only to open a door to infinite knowledge and wisdom but to set a limit to infinite error.
"Knowledge is a Superpower but the irony is you cannot get enough of it with ever increasing data base unless you try to keep up with it constantly and in the right way!" The best education comes from learning from people who know what they are exactly talking about.
Science is this glorious adventure into the unknown, the opportunity to discover things that nobody knew before. And that’s just an experience that’s not to be missed. But it’s also a motivated effort to try to help humankind. And maybe that’s just by increasing human knowledge—because that’s a way to make us a nobler species.
If you are scientifically literate the world looks very different to you.
We do science and science communication not because they are easy but because they are difficult!
“Science is not a subject you studied in school. It’s life. We 're brought into existence by it!"
Links to some important articles :
1. Interactive science series...
a. how-to-do-research-and-write-research-papers-part 13
b. Some Qs people asked me on science and my replies to them...
Part 6, part-10, part-11, part-12, part 14 , part- 8,
part- 1, part-2, part-4, part-5, part-16, part-17, part-18 , part-19 , part-20
part-21 , part-22, part-23, part-24, part-25, part-26, part-27 , part-28
part-29, part-30, part-31, part-32, part-33, part-34, part-35, part-36, part-37,
part-38, part-40, part-41, part-42, part-43, part-44, part-45, part-46, part-47
Part 48, part49, Critical thinking -part 50 , part -51, part-52, part-53
part-54, part-55, part-57, part-58, part-59, part-60, part-61, part-62, part-63
part 64, part-65, part-66, part-67, part-68, part 69, part-70 part-71, part-73 ...
.......306
BP variations during pregnancy part-72
who is responsible for the gender of their children - a man or a woman -part-56
c. some-questions-people-asked-me-on-science-based-on-my-art-and-poems -part-7
d. science-s-rules-are-unyielding-they-will-not-be-bent-for-anybody-part-3-
e. debate-between-scientists-and-people-who-practice-and-propagate-pseudo-science - part -9
f. why astrology is pseudo-science part 15
g. How Science is demolishing patriarchal ideas - part-39
2. in-defence-of-mangalyaan-why-even-developing-countries-like-india need space research programmes
3. Science communication series:
a. science-communication - part 1
b. how-scienitsts-should-communicate-with-laymen - part 2
c. main-challenges-of-science-communication-and-how-to-overcome-them - part 3
d. the-importance-of-science-communication-through-art- part 4
e. why-science-communication-is-geting worse - part 5
f. why-science-journalism-is-not-taken-seriously-in-this-part-of-the-world - part 6
g. blogs-the-best-bet-to-communicate-science-by-scientists- part 7
h. why-it-is-difficult-for-scientists-to-debate-controversial-issues - part 8
i. science-writers-and-communicators-where-are-you - part 9
j. shooting-the-messengers-for-a-different-reason-for-conveying-the- part 10
k. why-is-science-journalism-different-from-other-forms-of-journalism - part 11
l. golden-rules-of-science-communication- Part 12
m. science-writers-should-develop-a-broader-view-to-put-things-in-th - part 13
n. an-informed-patient-is-the-most-cooperative-one -part 14
o. the-risks-scientists-will-have-to-face-while-communicating-science - part 15
p. the-most-difficult-part-of-science-communication - part 16
q. clarity-on-who-you-are-writing-for-is-important-before-sitting-to write a science story - part 17
r. science-communicators-get-thick-skinned-to-communicate-science-without-any-bias - part 18
s. is-post-truth-another-name-for-science-communication-failure?
t. why-is-it-difficult-for-scientists-to-have-high-eqs
u. art-and-literature-as-effective-aids-in-science-communication-and teaching
v.* some-qs-people-asked-me-on-science communication-and-my-replies-to-them
** qs-people-asked-me-on-science-and-my-replies-to-them-part-173
w. why-motivated-perception-influences-your-understanding-of-science
x. science-communication-in-uncertain-times
y. sci-com: why-keep-a-dog-and-bark-yourself
z. How to deal with sci com dilemmas?
A+. sci-com-what-makes-a-story-news-worthy-in-science
B+. is-a-perfect-language-important-in-writing-science-stories
C+. sci-com-how-much-entertainment-is-too-much-while-communicating-sc
D+. sci-com-why-can-t-everybody-understand-science-in-the-same-way
E+. how-to-successfully-negotiate-the-science-communication-maze
4. Health related topics:
a. why-antibiotic-resistance-is-increasing-and-how-scientists-are-tr
b. what-might-happen-when-you-take-lots-of-medicines
c. know-your-cesarean-facts-ladies
d. right-facts-about-menstruation
e. answer-to-the-question-why-on-big-c
f. how-scientists-are-identifying-new-preventive-measures-and-cures-
g. what-if-little-creatures-high-jack-your-brain-and-try-to-control-
h. who-knows-better?
k. can-rust-from-old-drinking-water-pipes-cause-health-problems
l. pvc-and-cpvc-pipes-should-not-be-used-for-drinking-water-supply
m. melioidosis
o. desensitization-and-transplant-success-story
p. do-you-think-the-medicines-you-are-taking-are-perfectly-alright-then revisit your position!
q. swine-flu-the-difficlulties-we-still-face-while-tackling-the-outb
r. dump-this-useless-information-into-a-garbage-bin-if-you-really-care about evidence based medicine
s. don-t-ignore-these-head-injuries
u. allergic- agony-caused-by-caterpillars-and-moths
General science:
a.why-do-water-bodies-suddenly-change-colour
b. don-t-knock-down-your-own-life-line
c. the-most-menacing-animal-in-the-world
d. how-exo-planets-are-detected
e. the-importance-of-earth-s-magnetic-field
f. saving-tigers-from-extinction-is-still-a-travail
g. the-importance-of-snakes-in-our-eco-systems
h. understanding-reverse-osmosis
i. the-importance-of-microbiomes
j. crispr-cas9-gene-editing-technique-a-boon-to-fixing-defective-gen
k. biomimicry-a-solution-to-some-of-our-problems
5. the-dilemmas-scientists-face
6. why-we-get-contradictory-reports-in-science
7. be-alert-pseudo-science-and-anti-science-are-on-prowl
8. science-will-answer-your-questions-and-solve-your-problems
9. how-science-debunks-baseless-beliefs
10. climate-science-and-its-relevance
11. the-road-to-a-healthy-life
12. relative-truth-about-gm-crops-and-foods
13. intuition-based-work-is-bad-science
14. how-science-explains-near-death-experiences
15. just-studies-are-different-from-thorough-scientific-research
16. lab-scientists-versus-internet-scientists
17. can-you-challenge-science?
18. the-myth-of-ritual-working
19.science-and-superstitions-how-rational-thinking-can-make-you-work-better
20. comets-are-not-harmful-or-bad-omens-so-enjoy-the-clestial-shows
21. explanation-of-mysterious-lights-during-earthquakes
22. science-can-tell-what-constitutes-the-beauty-of-a-rose
23. what-lessons-can-science-learn-from-tragedies-like-these
24. the-specific-traits-of-a-scientific-mind
25. science-and-the-paranormal
26. are-these-inventions-and-discoveries-really-accidental-and-intuitive like the journalists say?
27. how-the-brain-of-a-polymath-copes-with-all-the-things-it-does
28. how-to-make-scientific-research-in-india-a-success-story
29. getting-rid-of-plastic-the-natural-way
30. why-some-interesting-things-happen-in-nature
31. real-life-stories-that-proves-how-science-helps-you
32. Science and trust series:
a. how-to-trust-science-stories-a-guide-for-common-man
b. trust-in-science-what-makes-people-waver
c. standing-up-for-science-showing-reasons-why-science-should-be-trusted
You will find the entire list of discussions here: http://kkartlab.in/group/some-science/forum
( Please go through the comments section below to find scientific research reports posted on a daily basis and watch videos based on science)
Get interactive...
Please contact us if you want us to add any information or scientific explanation on any topic that interests you. We will try our level best to give you the right information.
Our mail ID: kkartlabin@gmail.com
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa 16 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
A sweeping global review by researchers has found that mRNA vaccines—now administered billions of times worldwide—are safe and highly effective at preventing infectious diseases like COVID-19, and have potential applications for a range of other…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa yesterday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: Apart from surrogacy, can a grand mother give birth to her grand children naturally?Krishna: Serial polyembryony is a rare reproductive process where a single fertilized egg or embryo grows additional embryos inside itself while still developing.…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Tuesday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Each year, doctors treat more than 6 million bone fractures in the United States. And while it takes only a few seconds for a bone…Continue
Started by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa. Last reply by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa on Monday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Q: Rainy season is back. So are fruit flies. We hear about flies making us sick. But Can fruit flies make people sick if they touch your food?Krishna:…Continue
Comment
Giant exoplanet may hold a magnetic grip on its host star
Within their planetary systems, stars are continuously shaping their orbiting planets through gravity, radiation and magnetic forces. So far, this relationship has appeared to be a one-way street.
But through new research published in Science, an international research team has found compelling evidence that the dynamic can run in reverse: A giant exoplanet orbiting very close to its star appears to be leaving a measurable magnetic imprint on the star itself.
The ways in which stars influence their planets are varied and powerful. Gravitationally, a star can distort a planet's orbit over time, stretching it or locking its rotation into step with its orbit. Radiatively, the intense light and high-energy particles streaming from a star can erode a planet's atmosphere, gradually stripping away lighter gases.
Magnetically, the star's field pervades the surrounding space, interacting with any magnetic field the planet itself possesses. In most cases, the star so thoroughly dominates these interactions that any influence the planet might exert in return is negligible.
For their study, the team focused on a red dwarf star called GJ 436, located about 30 light-years from Earth and roughly half the mass of our sun. It is orbited by a single known planet: a world around the size of Neptune and four times the mass of Earth. The exoplanet also completes a full orbit every 2.6 days, placing it extraordinarily close to its host star.
The researchers analyzed 18 years of high-resolution spectroscopic observations of the star, tracking specific emission signatures from hydrogen and calcium in its outer atmospheric layer. Since these signatures are sensitive to the star's magnetic environment, they are an especially useful indicator of activity.
Remarkably, the team found periodic fluctuations in these signals that matched the planet's orbital period—suggesting the planet was somehow triggering a rhythmic response in the star. This signal wasn't always present, however. During periods of high stellar activity, it was drowned out, and during very quiet periods, there was too little background activity for the planet's influence to enhance. But at intermediate activity levels, a clear periodic pattern emerged.
To explain this unusual pattern, the team modeled a physical connection between the magnetic field lines of the planet and star, which funnel energy into the star's outer atmosphere. Accounting for the star's rotation and the planet's tilted, eccentric orbit, this model was able to reproduce the observations and placed the planet's magnetic field strength as comparable to Jupiter's.
The findings present the possibility of an entirely new type of relationship between exoplanets and their host stars.
D. Revilla et al, Constraining an exoplanet's magnetic field using star-planet interactions, Science (2026). DOI: 10.1126/science.adv3075
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a psychiatric condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, a loss of interest in everyday activities, altered sleeping and/or eating patterns, low energy, and difficulty concentrating on tasks. While it is one of the most widespread mental health disorders worldwide, its unique neural and brain-related signatures have not yet been fully uncovered.
Recent studies have been trying to uncover differences in the structure of the brain associated with specific mental health disorders. This has mainly been done by analyzing brain scans collected from psychiatric patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a medical imaging technique that collects detailed images of specific organs using strong magnetic fields and radio waves.
Researchers recently performed a large-scale analysis of MRI scans collected from individuals diagnosed with depression and from people with no known mental health disorders. The results of their analysis, published in Nature Mental Health, unveiled differences in the structure of specific brain regions associated with depression, which appear to vary based on age, treatment stage, and medication use.
The researchers analyzed MRI brain scans collected from 5,736 patients with MDD and 6,538 individuals with no known psychiatric conditions. These scans were collected by 64 independent research groups worldwide as part of two international research projects.
The analyses show significantly lower cortical thickness in patients with MDD in multiple brain regions, including the inferior parietal, lateral occipital, superior parietal, medial and lateral orbitofrontal, anterior and posterior cingulate, and precentral gyri, with cortical surface area showing no significant differences.
The team found that people with depression exhibited thinner cortical layers across various brain regions, but no significant differences in these regions' surface area. These observed differences appeared to be more pronounced in adult patients who were having an acute depressive episode. In contrast, adolescents with depression did not present any significant differences in brain structure compared with adolescents with no mental health disorders.
The researchers also observed slightly more prominent cortical thinning in the brains of patients who were taking antidepressant medications, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Nonetheless, the effects of antidepressant use on people's brain structure appeared to be subtle and modest in size.
Chao-Gan Yan et al, Vertex-wise cortical abnormalities in major depressive disorder from 64 cohorts from the DIRECT and ENIGMA MDD consortia, Nature Mental Health (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s44220-026-00667-9.
Ovaries start second job after menopause
After the ovaries ramp down their reproductive role, releasing eggs and sex hormones, they might become more important to the immune system. Evidence from people and mice suggest that genes and proteins associated with immune activity are more active and prevalent in postreproductive ovaries — though it’s unclear whether it's a beneficial change.
Researchers found signs of reproductive function, including markers associated with egg and steroid production, diminished with age among the mice they tested. But the analyses of post-reproductive ovaries also revealed various kinds of immune cells at higher levels than what’s typical in younger mice. Older ovaries also showed greater activity of genes that encode different pro-inflammatory compounds, immune molecules that could be secreted into the bloodstream and travel to other parts of the body.
Whether older ovaries actually carry out any immune signalling or simply become an unintended reservoir for immune cells remains unclear. The new mouse study is interesting because it provides a potential idea as to what the post-reproductive ovary might be doing. The ovary might become a site where immune cells … come and get changed in some way that would potentially have systemic effects.
The finding could help explain why women tend to be less healthy than men as they age, even though they live longer.
The postreproductive ovary could secrete molecules that predispose people to chronic inflammation in their menopausal years.
https://academic.oup.com/molehr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/molehr/...
Concussion symptom history linked to increased odds of tinnitus
Greater concussion symptom history is associated with increased odds of tinnitus, and associations with cognition, depression, and anxiety are larger among those with tinnitus, according to a study published online June 19 inSports Medicine Open.
In former professional American football players, greater self-reported concussion symptom history was associated with higher odds of tinnitus (odds ratio 2.90 for highest vs lowest quintile). Tinnitus did not mediate associations between concussion history and neurobehavioral outcomes, but individuals with tinnitus showed stronger associations with perceived cognitive problems, depression, and anxiety.
Niki A. Konstantinides et al, Associations Between Football-Related Exposures, Head Injury, Tinnitus, and Neuropsychological Health Outcomes Among Professional American-Style Football Players, Sports Medicine—Open (2026). DOI: 10.1186/s40798-026-01053-6
To understand how we detect light and perceive colours, we need to know the exact structure of light-sensitive molecules in our eyes.
A global team now has cracked a decades-old mystery, revealing the atomic structures of the molecules in our eyes that allow us to see colours.
Our perception of colour is mainly determined by the relative excitation of red-, green- and blue-sensitive cone photoreceptor cells found inside our retinas that contain these molecules.
There are three versions of the molecules, called cone opsins, with each converting red, green or blue light into chemical signals.
Revealing the atomic structures for each of the molecules in their light-activated state shows how they work inside cone cells to trigger signals that are ultimately sent to the brain. ?The results reveal fundamental differences between the cone opsins when they enter their active state after being hit with light.
Like how a high shutter speed lets a camera capture sharper images, having color-detecting molecules in our eyes that turn on and off quickly is thought to allow us to see sharp detail and color in motion accurately in daylight.
All three cone opsins contain the same light-sensitive vitamin A-derived molecule, with red, green and blue opsins binding to this molecule, called retinaldehyde, differently.
The red and green opsins appear to use very different placement of chemical electronic charges around the retinaldehyde. This difference explains how they shut off faster than the blue opsin, and much faster than the rod pigment.
In the long term, this development could help scientists discover better treatments for some vision disorders, such as cone dystrophies and altered colour vision.
Qi Peng et al, Cryo–electron microscopy structures of human cone visual pigments, Science (2026). DOI: 10.1126/science.adz8141
in this case, the probability of a species successfully adapting multiplies with every condition that it meets. And it turns out that this pattern can be described mathematically as a very simple, bell-shaped curve. Such a curve essentially describes what fraction of the world's animals can adapt at given rates, from the slowest to the fastest adapters, and how this fraction changes nonlinearly with the rate of adaptation. This curve generally shows that most animal groups can adapt at intermediate rates, while fewer animal groups adapt at the slowest and fastest rates.
After establishing this general pattern of adaptation rates, the researchers looked to see how this pattern compares with recorded rates of environmental change, and how these two rates match, or don't match, at times of mass extinction.
To do so, they considered paleontological and geochemical data from 27 episodes over the last 450 million years in which the carbon cycle experienced significant change—a measure that is generally understood to reflect global environmental change. They then compared rates of environmental change with the fraction of animal groups that went extinct during each episode—numbers that were established previously in a well-regarded study by paleobiologist John Alroy.
In the end, researchers observed that, for almost every mass extinction event in the last 450 million years, there was a mismatch in the rates at which the environment changed and at which animals could adapt; mass extinctions occurred when a significant fraction of animals could not adapt fast enough to match the changing environment. Their results confirm that the rate-mismatch hypothesis applies at the global scale.
Moreover, this mismatch in rates could predict the severity of extinction events, or the fraction of animal life that went extinct given the rate at which the environment changed.
In the case of the end-Permian extinction, it's likely that the rapid acidification of the ocean outpaced organisms' ability to evolve adequate protections, leading to the extinction of more than 80% of the world's marine species.
The team's work focuses on applying the new model to past extinction events. But the work could also provide a framework for understanding modern extinction risk.
Carbon dioxide levels in the ocean are increasing today at a rate which, when appropriately re-scaled, is similar to rates of carbon-cycle change that are just lower than those associated with major extinction events in the past.
It suggests that modern environmental change may be approaching rates beyond which adaptation becomes increasingly difficult.
Daniel H. Rothman et al, Relating Rates of Global Change, Evolutionary Adaptation, and Extinction, Physical Review Letters (2026). DOI: 10.1103/62jn-xgqy
Part 2
What happens when environmental change outpaces life's ability to adapt?
When an animal's environment changes faster than the animal can adapt, its chances of survival can flatline. The same is true for populations and even entire species. Now, scientists have found that this connection between evolutionary adaptation and the pace of environmental change holds up at the global scale as well—and can determine life's susceptibility to mass extinction. The researchers have developed a theoretical model of this phenomenon, which they present in a paper published recently in Physical Review Letters.
A mathematical model links mass extinction severity to a mismatch between rates of global environmental change and biological adaptation. Using carbon-cycle proxies and extinction data from 27 events over 450 Myr, mass die-offs occur when environmental change exceeds most taxa’s adaptive capacity. Modern CO₂-driven change approaches these critical rate thresholds.
The team compared the model with available data from past major mass extinctions, including how fast the global environment changed at the time of each event. The model successfully predicted the severity of most mass extinctions in Earth's history, or the fraction of life that was unable to adapt and therefore went extinct.
Interestingly, the researchers found that the range of adaptation rates across animal groups is broadly similar to the range of rates at which the environment can change.
What we're beginning to see is a certain level of organization, and ways in which life behaves that are consistent with the ways in which the environment behaves.
It may be that life has evolved so that its range of adaptabilities matches the range of stresses that it meets.
For their new study, the researchers looked to test the rate-mismatch hypothesis at the global scale. They wanted to see whether mass extinction events in history could be explained by a mismatch between the rate of global environmental change and the rate at which life around the world can adapt.
To do so, at least in theory, they would have to compare two sources of data: the rates at which the global environment has changed over time and the rates at which different groups of organisms adapt to environmental change. The first can be found in geological records, which scientists have used extensively to infer how Earth's climate changed through history. The second, however, is almost impossible to record.
It is generally understood in evolutionary theory that a species can successfully adapt only when multiple conditions are met. For instance, there must be variation in the population. These variations must be heritable, some variations must enable an organism to adapt better than others, and the organisms that adapt better should leave more offspring. If all these conditions are met, the entire species should be able to adapt to a given environmental change. However, if any one condition fails, the population will go extinct.
Part 1
Did gravitational tides cause Earth's extinctions?
The article discusses a hypothesis that close passages of planetary-mass or dwarf-planet objects could generate strong gravitational tides, triggering giant tsunamis, enhanced volcanism, climate shifts, and redirected impactors, collectively driving some mass extinctions over the past 600 Myr. Correlations with geological and orbital anomalies are noted, but mass, frequency, and detailed evidence for such flybys remain highly uncertain.
Daniele Fargion, Mass Extinctions by Gravitational Tides, arXiv (2026). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2606.17105
To find this fingerprint, the team turned to an unsupervised deep learning approach—one that could extract hidden structural information from the data without any predefined assumptions about what the two structures should look like.
It is practically impossible for humans to intuitively guess or manually construct such complex, nonlinear, and nearly orthogonal physical parameters.
so the researchers took AIs help.
By using AI the researchers effectively rotated their viewing angle of the data, searching for the configuration at which the two structures—if they existed—would reveal themselves most clearly.
When the model found the optimal configuration, two distinct clusters emerged, suggesting two local structures: Structure A, denser and more disordered, and Structure B, less dense and more ordered. The simulations found these patterns across a broad range of temperatures and pressures, including some close to room-temperature conditions.
But the study revealed something beyond support for the existence of the two structures. The way Structure A and Structure B interconvert depends on where the system sits in the phase diagram. In the high-density liquid phase, the interconversion proceeds via an "upper semi-loop" pathway through a single transition state. In the low-density liquid phase, it follows a different "lower semi-loop" pathway through a different transition state.
Near the liquid-liquid phase boundary, where the two liquid phases compete most intensely, these two pathways combine into a complex three-dimensional "full-loop" reaction pathway involving three transition states. As the system moves away from the boundary and one phase begins to dominate, this full loop degenerates back into a simpler single-pathway semi-loop.
The transformation between Structure A and Structure B is not a simple 'back-and-forth' process. The interconversion pathways of the two structures are different under different states of water. This microscopic dynamic process is extremely difficult to identify using traditional theoretical methods.
The findings provide strong molecular-level evidence for the two-state model of water, with the bimodal feature in the data offering a structural signature of the two distinct local states.
Liwen Li et al, Evidence for the generic existence of two local structures in liquid water, Nature Physics (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41567-026-03301-8.
Part 2
Scientists find molecular-level evidence for two structures in liquid water
A study published in Nature Physics provides new molecular-level evidence from simulations that liquid water is not a single uniform substance, but a constantly shifting mixture of two distinct microscopic structures.
The idea that water might exist in two distinct structural states is not new. For decades, scientists have theorized that liquid water is composed of two interconvertible local structures—one denser and more disordered, the other less dense and more ordered.
This "two-state model" has been invoked to explain water's many anomalous properties, including why it becomes easier to compress as it cools and why it reaches maximum density at 4°C (39°F) rather than at its freezing point. But the model has remained controversial because direct molecular-level evidence for the two structures has been elusive.
Central to the two-state model is a hypothesized phenomenon known as the liquid-liquid phase transition (LLPT). The idea is that in the deeply supercooled regime, water splits into two macroscopically distinct liquid phases: a high-density liquid and a low-density liquid.
The boundary between them is thought to terminate at a "second critical point." This deeply supercooled region is so hard to study experimentally because water crystallizes rapidly. Much of the evidence for the LLPT has therefore come from computational studies.
Previously, a 2025 Nature Physics study made progress by using a deep neural network to map the location of this critical point.
"According to the two-state hypothesis, liquid water can be viewed as a mixture of two distinct structures, A and B. But no one has ever seen a genuine 'pure A' or 'pure B' liquid water. Indeed, due to the lack of direct molecular-level evidence, this model has been a subject of debate.
The problem is not just experimental, according to the researchers. Even in simulations, traditional methods that measure local density and energy differences between molecules failed to cleanly separate the two structures. What was needed was a way to let the data reveal the hidden molecular fingerprint of each structure—without any human assumptions about what that fingerprint should look like.
Part 1
© 2026 Created by Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Science Simplified! to add comments!